References
- Ackerman, P., & Kruegler, C. (1994). Strategic nonviolent conflict: The dynamics of people power in the twentieth century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Gillion, D. Q. (2013). The political power of protest: minority activism and shifts in public policy. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139381277
- Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511802331
- MacWilliams, M. C. (2016). Who decides when the party doesn’t? Authoritarian voters and the rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics 49(4): 716-721. doi:10.1017/S1049096516001463
- Amira, K., Wright, J. C., & Goya-Tocchetto, D. (2019). In-group love versus out-group hate: Which is more important to partisans and when? Political Behavior, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09557-6
- Biggs, M., Barrie, C., & Andrews, K. T. (2020). Did local civil rights protest liberalize Whites’ racial attitudes? Research and Politics.
- Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1086/681591
- Boyle, M. P., McLeod, D. M., & Armstrong, C. L. (2012). Adherence to the protest paradigm. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211433837
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. The American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000165
- Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., & Huber, G. A. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074
- Burstein, P., & Linton, A. (2002). The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy. Social Forces, 81(2), 380–408. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0004
- Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The Strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.
- Christie, B. (2017). AZ senate OKs racketeering charges for riots. AZCENTRAL. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2017/02/23/arizona-senate-oks-racketeering-charges-riots/98296298/
- Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Caughey, D. (2018). Information equivalence in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.9
- Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi000023
- Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00402.x
- Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.
- Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00150
- Gregg, R. B. (1984). The power of nonviolence. Greenleaf Books.
- Gutting, R. S. (2019). Contentious activities, disrespectful protesters: Effect of protest context on protest support and mobilization across ideology and authoritarianism. Political behavior 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-09523-8
- Hartig, H. (2018). Nearly six-in-ten Americans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. PewResearch.org. https://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2018/10/17/nearly-six-in-ten-americans-say-abortion should-be-legal/
- Havel, V. (2009). The power of the powerless. Routledge.
- Horowitz, J. M., & Livingston, G. (2016). How Americans view the Black lives matter movement. PewResearch.org. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact- tank/2016/07/08/how-americans-view-the-black-lives-matter-movement/
- Huddy, L., & Bankert, A. (2017). Political partisanship as a social identity. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1-29). Oxford University Press
- Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604
- Huff, C., & Kertzer, J. D. (2018). How the public defines terrorism. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12329
- Huff, C., & Kruszewska, D. (2016). Banners, barricades, and bombs: The tactical choices of social movements and public opinion. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1774–1808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015621072
- Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. The American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000414
- Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Demographics of mechanical turk (Technical Report CeDER-10–01). New York: New York University. (pp. 1–14).
- Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
- Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
- Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407
- Kouddous, S. A. (2018). Palestinians engaged in nonviolent protest. Israel responded with a Massacre. The Nation, https://www.thenation.com/article/palestinians-engaged-in-nonviolent-protest-israel-responded-with-a-massacre/
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- Kurzman, C. (2009). The unthinkable revolution in Iran. Harvard University Press. “Little Partisan agreement on the pressing problems facing the U.S”. Pew Research Center. https://www.people-press.org/2018/10/15/little-partisan-agreement-on-the-pressing-problems-facing-the-u-s/
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). Pew Research Center. October 15, https://www.people-press.org/2018/10/15/little-partisan-agreement-on-the-pressing-problems-facing-the-u-s/.
- Little Partisan Agreement on the Pressing Problems Facing the U.S. (2018). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
- Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
- Mazumder, S. (2018). The Persistent effect of US civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 922–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12384
- McLeod, D. M., & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02802.x
- Muschert, C. W. (2007). The Columbine victims and the myth of the Juvenile Superpredator. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5(4), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006296173
- Nicholson, S. P. (2011). Dominating cues and the limits of elite influence. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161100082X
- Orazani, S. N., & Leidner, B. (2019). The power of nonviolence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2526
- Schock, K. (2005). Unarmed insurrections. University of Minnesota Press.
- Sharp, G. (1973). The politics of nonviolent action. Porter Sargent.
- Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Feinberg, M. (2018). Does violent protest backfire? Testing a theory of public reactions to activist violencezd. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118803189
- Singer, P. (1973). Democracy and Disobedience. Clarendon Press.
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
- Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). When will collective action be effective? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510525
- Tulbert, J. (2019). CPAC 2019 showcased dangerous and extreme anti-abortion rhetoric ahead of the 2020 elections. Mediamatters.org. https://www.mediamatters.org/laura-ingraham/cpac-2019-showcased-dangerous-and-extreme-anti-abortion-rhetoric-ahead-2020
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
- Wasow, O. (2017). Do protests matter? Evidence from the 1960s Black insurgency [Unpublished Paper]. http://www.omarwasow.com/Protests_on_Voting.pdf
- Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
- Wouters, R. (2019). The persuasive power of protest. How protest wins public support. Social Forces, 98(1), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy110