Non-News Websites Expose People to More Political Content Than News Websites: Evidence from Browsing Data in Three Countries

References

• Aalberg, T., Blekesaune, A., & Elvestad, E. (2013). Media choice and informed democracy: Toward increasing news consumption gaps in Europe? The International Journal of Press/politics, 18(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213485990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2006). It feels like we’re thinking: The rationalizing voter and electoral democracy. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 30.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Howland, B., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D., & Watts, D. J. (2020). Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem. Science Advances, 6(14), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, K. (2019). An entrance for the uninterested: Who watches soft news and how does it affect their political participation? Mass Communication and Society, 22(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1585544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don’t expect too much! learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research, 36(6), 783–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 194–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. S. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. The Journal of Politics, 68(4), 946–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, K., Van Aelst, P., Verhoest, P., & d’Haenens, L. (2021). What do people learn from following the news? a diary study on the influence of media use on knowledge of current news stories. European Journal of Communication, 36(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120978724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93(3), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J. (2017). Against democracy. In Against democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1996). News frames, political cynicism, and media cynicism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, M. R., & Bureau, I. A. (2013). Audience Reach Measurement Guidelines Version 2.0. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/AudienceReachMeasurementGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). (Mis-)estimating affective polarization. The Journal of Politics, 715603. https://doi.org/10.1086/715603
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Stroud, N. J., Bimber, B., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2013). Assessing selective exposure in experiments: The implications of different methodological choices. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3–4), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813923
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption [publisher: Oxford academic]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. F. (2017). The cognitive and emotional sources of trump support: The case of low-information voters. New Political Science, 39(4), 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1378295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M. (2021). (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ online media diets. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics [Google-books-ID: 954NJChZAGoC]. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2019). Does incidental exposure on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? evidence from a panel study. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2463–2482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819850755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S., & Yang, T. (2022). No trade-offs between news and entertainment: Evidence from online engagement data. New Media & Society, 14614448211063900. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2021). The components of a url. https://prod.ibmdocs-production-dal-6099123ce774e592a519d7c33db8265e-0000.us-south.containers.appdomain.cloud/docs/en/cics-ts/5.2?topic=concepts-components-url
   Google Scholar
• Karnowski, V., Kümpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement. how perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). The other divide [Google-books-ID: qnRUEAAAQBAJ]. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, N., Lane, D. S., Weeks, B. E., Kim, D. H., & Lee, S. S. (2020). Now we’re talking? understanding the interplay between online selective and incidental exposure and their influence on online cross-cutting political discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 40(3), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320920790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. (1984). News context and the elimination of mobilizing information: An experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 61(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. S., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., & Yurukoglu, A. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menchen-Trevino, E. (2016). Web historian: Enabling multi-method and independent research with real-world web browsing history data. https://doi.org/10.9776/16611
   Google Scholar
• Merten, L. (2021). Block, hide or follow—personal news curation practices on social media. Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1018–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1829978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meta. (2022). Widely viewed content report: What people see on facebook. https://transparency.fb.com/data/widely-viewed-content-report/
   Google Scholar
• Moody, R. (2021). Screen time statistics: Average screen time in us vs. the rest of the world. https://www.comparitech.com/tv-streaming/screen-time-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_3
   Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. (2016). Partisanship and preference formation: Competing motivations, elite polarization, and issue importance. Political Behavior, 38(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9318-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). How the mass media divide us. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540707044X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanz, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). Democratic consequences of incidental exposure to political information: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechushtai, E. (2018). From liberal to polarized liberal? contemporary us news in Hallin and mancini’s typology of news systems. The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218771902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2019). Reuters institute digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2019/
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2012). Polarizing cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohme, J. (2020). Mobile but not mobilized? differential gains from mobile news consumption for citizens’ political knowledge and campaign participation. Digital Journalism, 8(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1697625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papilot.pl. (2021). Polacy spędzają w sieci 23 lata, 5 miesięcy i 16 dni swojego życia. https://www.papilot.pl/lifestyle/ciekawostki/57226/polacy-spedzaja-w-sieci-23-lata-5-miesiecy-i-16-dni-swojego-zycia
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. S. (2019). Does too much news on social media discourage news seeking? mediating role of news efficacy between perceived news overload and news avoidance on social media. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119872956. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119872956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? the impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390211172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon; schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. B., Debbelt, C. A., & Schneider, F. M. (2018). Too much information? predictors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1305427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes america. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, M., & Andersen, K. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somin, I. (2016). Brexit and Political Ignorance. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/06/14/brexit-and-political-ignorance/
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Jung, J., & Kim, Y. (2017). Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitudinal consequences for news usage in south korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Mangold, F., Scharkow, M., & Breuer, J. (2022). Post post-broadcast democracy? news exposure in the age of online intermediaries. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 768–774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
   Google Scholar
• Stromback, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, K. (2020). Attracting the news: Algorithms, platforms, and reframing incidental exposure. Journalism, 21(8), 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A. D. (1863). Democracy in America [Google-books-ID: xZfibezcptec]. Sever; Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Toff, B., & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2020). All the news that’s fit to ignore. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer, S., Trilling, D., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. (2020). Online news user journeys: The role of social media, news websites, and topics. Digital Journalism, 8(9), 1114–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1767509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villi, M., Aharoni, T., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., Boczkowski, P. J., Hayashi, K., Mitchelstein, E., Tanaka, A., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2022). Taking a break from news: A five-nation study of news avoidance in the digital era. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1904266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., & Hahn, L. B. (2022). Online incidental exposure to news can minimize interest-based political knowledge gaps: Evidence from two u.S. elections. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221991550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., & Thorson, K. (2017). Combining big data and survey techniques to model effects of political content flows in facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., de Leeuw, S., Menchen-Trevino, E., Lee, S., Huang-Isherwood, K. M., & Weeks, B. (2021). No polarization from partisan news: Over-time evidence from trace data. The International Journal of Press/politics, 19401612211047190. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211047194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., Menchen-Trevino, E., Goncalves, J. F. F., & Weeks, B. E. (2021). Avenues to news and diverse news exposure online: Comparing direct navigation, social media, news aggregators, search queries, and article hyperlinks. The International Journal of Press/politics, 27(4), 860–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211009160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? Journal of Communication, 59(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M. E., von Hohenberg, B. C., Casas, A., Menchen-Trevino, E., de Leeuw, S., Gonçalves, A., & Boon, M. (2022). Null effects of news exposure: A test of the (un) desirable effects of a ‘news vacation’and ‘news binging’. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01423-x
   Google Scholar
• Yang, T., Majó-Vázquez, S., Nielsen, R. K., & González-Bailón, S. (2020). Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(46), 28678–28683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006089117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerberg. (2018). Zuckerberg 2018 post. Retrieved January 19, 2018, from https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10104445245963251
   Google Scholar