The Media and Democratization: A Long-Term Macro-Level Perspective on the Role of the Press During a Democratic Transition

References

• Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2011). How media inform democracy: Central debates. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803448
   Google Scholar
• Austrian Newspapers Online. (2022). http://anno.onb.ac.at/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Austrian Parliament. (2021). A Long Road: The Development of Electoral Law. https://www.parlament.gv.at/ENGL/PERK/PARL/DEM/ENTW/index.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P. (2019). Measuring democracy and democratization. In C. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, C. Welzel, & R. F. Inglehart (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 52–66). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, C. (2018). Richer, more equal, and more democratic. Annals of Comparative Democratization, 16(3), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, C., & Stokes, S. C. (2003). Endogenous democratization. World Politics, 55(4), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Downs, G. W. (2005). Development and democracy. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 77. https://doi.org/10.2307/20031707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlum, S. (2018). Modernization theory: What do we know after 60 years? Annals of Comparative Democratization, 16(3), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• De Toqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2019). Freedom in the World 2019 Data. https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world.
   Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshek, J. (2011). Media, instability, and democracy: Examining the Granger-causal relationships of 122 countries from 1946 to 2003. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1161–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, R., & Mughan, A., Gunther, R., Mughan, A. (2000). Democracy and the media: A comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175289
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A., & Storey, J. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haerpfer, C. W., Bernhagen, P., Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Democratization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Highley, J., & Gunther, R., Higley, J., Gunther, R. (1992). Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173902
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0016
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2014). Forecasting: Principles and practice. OTexts.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, R., & Khandakar, Y. (2008). Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R. Journal of Statistical Software, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i03
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jebril, N., Stetka, V., & Loveless, M. (2013). Media and democratisation: What is known about the role of mass media in transitions to democracy. University of Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Media%20and%20Democratisation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B. S. (1984). Historical perspective: Using the past to study the present. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/258443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson, P. T., & Dean, A. M. (2009). The democratic domino theory: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. (1975). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science, Vol. 3: Macropolitical theory (pp. 175–241). Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M., & Gurr, T. R. (2020). POLITY5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018. https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, G. (2018). Modernization theory as a case for failed knowledge production. Annals of Comparative Democratization, 16(3), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Murtin, F., & Wacziarg, R. (2014). The democratic transition. Journal of Economic Growth, 19(2), 141–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-013-9100-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olechowski, T. (2004). Die Entwicklung des Preßrechts in Österreich bis 1918: Ein Beitrag zur österreichischen Medienrechtsgeschichte [Development of press law in Austria until 1918: A contribution to Austrian media law history]. Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, P. (1998). Communicating democracy: The media and political transitions. Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1977). The open society and its enemies. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, V. (1998). Democratization and the media. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rathkolb, O. (2008). Demokratieentwicklung in Österreich seit dem 19. Jahrhundert [Democratization in Austria since the 19th century]. In Forum Politische Bildung (Ed.),Jugend – Demokratie – Politik: Informationen zur Politischen Bildung Nr. 28 [Adolescents – democracy – politics: Information on political education number 28] (pp. 5–17). Forum Politische Bildung.
   Google Scholar
• Rawnsley, G. D. (2006). Political communication and democracy. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554894
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, A. L., Dobbins, T. A., & Pearson, S. A. (2021). Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: A guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01235-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethaler, J., & Melischek, G. Opinion-leading media as indicators of a democracy at risk: The press and the rise of National Socialism between 1927 and 1932. (2022). European Journal of Communication, 38(1), 77–94. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221111910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, A. (2021). Comparing measures of democracy: Statistical properties, convergence, and interchangeability. European Political Science, 20(4), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-021-00328-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037002008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V-DEM. (2022). The V-DEM Dataset. https://www.v-dem.net/vdemds.html
   Google Scholar
• Voltmer, K. (2013). The media in transitional democracies. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Voltmer, K., & Rawnsley, G. (2019). The media. In C. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, C. Welzel, & R. F. Inglehart (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 239–252). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C. (2019). Theories of Democratization. In C. Haerpfer, P. Bernhagen, C. Welzel, & R. F. Inglehart (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 22–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, B., Groshek, J., & Rochefort, A. (2021). The humpty dumpty effect: Emerging media diffusion and (Granger) causal democratic change in 122 countries from 1946 to 2014. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1847231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessler, H. (2018). Habermas and the media. Polity.
   Google Scholar