Moralization of Rationality Can Stimulate Sharing of Hostile and False News on Social Media, but Intellectual Humility Inhibits it

References

• Alper, S. (2021). When conspiracy theories make sense: The role of social inclusiveness. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2umfe
   Google Scholar
• Altay, S., de Araujo, E., & Mercier, H. (2020). “If this account is true, it is most enormously wonderful”: Interestingness-if-true and the sharing of true and false news [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tdfh5
   Google Scholar
• Altay, S., Hacquin, A.-S., & Mercier, H. (2020). Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation. New Media & Society, 1461444820969893. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820969893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., & Worth, N. C. (2010). Status-driven risk taking and the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(6), 734–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bail, C. (2022). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartusevičius, H., van Leeuwen, F., & Petersen, M. B. (2020). Dominance-driven autocratic political orientations predict political violence in Western, educated, Industrialized, Rich, and democratic (WEIRD) and non-WEIRD samples. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1511–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620922476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bor, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). The psychology of online political hostility: A comprehensive, cross-national test of the mismatch hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. (2007). Are conspiracy theorists irrational? Episteme, 4(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.193
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. M., & Hutchinson, D. S. (1997). Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• de Araujo, E., Altay, S., Bor, A., & Mercier, H. (2020). Dominant Jerks: Sharing Offensive Statements can be Used to Demonstrate Dominance. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. (2019). Conspiracy theories on the basis of the evidence. Synthese, 196(6), 2243–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1532-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeScioli, P., Massenkoff, M., Shaw, A., Petersen, M. B., & Kurzban, R. (2014). Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1797), 20142112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of Trustworthiness from Intuitive Moral Judgments. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Political Extremism Is Supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science, 24(6), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., Bavel, J. J. V., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe1715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschall, J. (2021). The Story Paradox. Basic Books. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/jonathan-gottschall/the-story-paradox/9781541645974/
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2012). Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2184440. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2184440
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., & James, A. S. (2020). Moral grandstanding and political polarization: A multi-study consideration. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., James, A. S., Campbell, W. K., & Wetherell, G. (2019). Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0223749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2017). ‘I Am not a conspiracy theorist’: Relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu. Cultural Sociology, 11(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516661959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. (2013). The Making Sense Podcast. https://www.samharris.org/podcasts
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. (2020). The deadly ethnic riot. In The Deadly Ethnic Riot. University of California Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520342057/html
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2018). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. A., Pfleger, A., Herbig, L., Wagoner, B., Lorenz, L., & Watzlawik, M. (2021). What drives belief in vaccination conspiracy theories in Germany? Frontiers in Communication, 6, 105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.678335
   Google Scholar
• Jerit, J., & Kam, C. D. (2023). Information Processing. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, J. S. Levy, & J. Jerit (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.14
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzban, R. (2012). Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind.
   Google Scholar
• Laustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). Perceived conflict and Leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2020). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., Hp Hanel, P., & J Wolf, L. (2020). The very efficient assessment of need for cognition: Developing a six-item version. Assessment, 27(8), 1870–1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118793208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littrell, S., Klofstad, C., Diekman, A., Funchion, J., Murthi, M., Premaratne, K., Seelig, M., Verdear, D., Wuchty, S., & Uscinski, J. E. (2023). Who knowingly shares false political information online? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-121
   Google Scholar
• Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., & Kossowska, M. (2018). Addicted to answers: Need for cognitive closure and the endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie, A., Altay, S., Strickland, B., & Van Bavel, J. (2023). Moralization and extremism robustly amplify myside sharing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus, 2(4), d078. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad078
   Google Scholar
• Marie, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). Political conspiracy theories as tools for mobilization and signaling. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H. (2017). How Gullible Are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Altay, S. (2022). Do Cultural Misbeliefs Cause Costly Behavior? InJ. Sommer, J. Musolino, & P. Hemmer (Eds.), The cognitive science of belief: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 193–208). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009001021.014
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. (1998). On the genealogy of morality. Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Obradović, S., Power, S. A., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2020). Understanding the psychological appeal of populism. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023). Toward parsimony in bias research: A proposed common framework of belief-consistent information processing for a set of biases. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1464–1487. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221148147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. (2013). Moralization as protection against exploitation: Do individuals without allies moralize more? Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B. (2020a). The evolutionary psychology of mass mobilization: How disinformation and demagogues coordinate rather than manipulate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2020b). Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Arceneaux, K. (2023). The “need for chaos” and motivations to share hostile political rumors. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1486–1505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Tooby, J. (2020). The evolutionary psychology of conflict and the functions of falsehood. 131–150. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kaby9
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2019, June 21). One thing to change: Anecdotes aren’t data. Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/06/focal-point-harvard-professor-steven-pinker-says-the-truth-lies-in-the-data/
   Google Scholar
• Pinsof, D., Sears, D. O., & Haselton, M. G. (2023). Strange Bedfellows: The alliance theory of political belief systems. Psychological Inquiry, 34(3), 139–160. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2023.2274433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2019). The open society and its enemies: New one-volume edition. JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prior, M., Sood, G., & Khanna, K. (2015). You cannot be serious: The impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwardmann, P., & van der Weele, J. (2019). Deception and self-deception. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1055–1061. Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simchon, A., Brady, W. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). Troll and Divide: The Language of Online Polarization [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xjd64
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M., & Hoffman, M. (2021). Commitment and impersonation: A reputation-based theory of principled behavior [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ua57r
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161000006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Baumard, N. (2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27(5), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl, T., Zaal, M. P., Skitka, L. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moralized rationality: Relying on logic and evidence in the formation and evaluation of belief can be seen as a moral issue. Public Library of Science ONE, 11(11), e0166332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166332
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, P. K. (2018). The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Thinking clearly about causal inferences of politically motivated reasoning: Why paradigmatic study designs often undermine causal inference. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2016). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, K., & M Oppenheimer, D. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment & Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in Mind: The Coalitional Roots of War and Morality, In Høgh-Olesen, H. (Ed.). Human Morality and Sociality: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, 91–234, Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tosi, J., & Warmke, B. (2016). Moral grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. (2020). Conspiracy theories: A primer. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Funchion, J. R., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2021). American politics in two dimensions: Partisan and ideological identities versus anti-establishment orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Vugt, M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618774270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(1), 1–16; discussion 16-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings Biological Sciences, 278(1715), 2223–2232. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2014). The hidden agenda of the political mind. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard-Snyder, D. (2017). Intellectual humility: Owning our limitations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94(3), 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar