Engaging Populism? The Popularity of European Populist Political Parties on Facebook and Twitter, 2010–2020

References

• Arzheimer, K., & Carter, E. (2006). Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, C., & Ho, J. (2021). academictwitteR: An R package to access the twitter academic research product track v2 API endpoint. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(62), 3272. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03272
   Google Scholar
• Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (2007). Random coefficient models for time-series – cross-section data: Monte carlo experiments. Political Analysis, 15(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bene, M. (2023). Who reaps the benefits? A cross-country investigation of the absolute and relative normalization and equalization theses in the 2019 European parliament elections. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1708–1727. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211019688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bene, M., Ceron, A., Fenoll, V., Haßler, J., Kruschinski, S., Olof Larsson, A., Magin, M., Schlosser, K., & Wurst, A.-K. (2022). Keep them engaged! Investigating the effects of self-centered social media communication style on user engagement in 12 European countries. Political Communication, 39(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2042435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S. (2021). The causes of populism in the west. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102503
   Google Scholar
• Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blassnig, S., Nicole, E., Sven, E., & Frank, E. (2019). Populism and social media popularity. In R. Davis & D. Taras (Eds.), Power shift? Political leadership and social media (pp. 97–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466007-7
   Google Scholar
• Bobba, G. (2019). Social media populism: Features and ‘likeability’ of lega nord communication on facebook. European Political Science, 18(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracciale, R., Andretta, M., & Martella, A. (2021). Does populism go viral? How Italian leaders engage citizens through social media. Information, Communication & Society, 24(10), 1477–1494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C. (2018). Advanced bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
   Google Scholar
• Campante, F., Durante, R., & Sobbrio, F. (2017). Politics 2.0: The multifaceted effect of broadband internet on political participation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(4), 1094–1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, XLVII(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, A., Feenstra, R. A., & Tormey, S. (2016). Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/politics, 21(3), 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216645340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccobelli, D., Quaranta, M., & Valeriani, A. (2020). Citizens’ engagement with popularization and with populist actors on Facebook: A study on 52 leaders in 18 western democracies. European Journal of Communication, 35(5), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120909292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datts, M., & Schultze, M. (2022). Social media and politics on the local level. Policy & Internet, 14(2), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinas, E., Matakos, K., Xefteris, D., & Hangartner, D. (2019). Waking up the Golden Dawn: Does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties? Political Analysis, 27(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H., Huber, C., & Manow, P. (2022). Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in established democracies. https://www.parlgov.org/
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H., & Regel, S. (2019). Party facts: A database of political parties worldwide. Party Politics, 25(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818820671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberl, J.-M., Tolochko, P., Jost, P., Heidenreich, T., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2020). What’s in a post? How sentiment and issue salience affect users’ emotional reactions on facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1710318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Olof Larsson, A. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable opportunity structures for populist communication: Comparing different types of politicians and issues in social media, television and the press. The International Journal of Press/politics, 24(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2021). Do you participate in social networks?. June 30, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210630-1
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M., & Won, M. (2023). The unintended consequences of amplifying the radical right on twitter. Political Communication, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2232752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, N., Graziano, P., & Tsakatika, M. (2021). Varieties of inclusionary populism? SYRIZA, podemos and the five star movement. Government and Opposition, 56(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, M., Schularick, M., & Trebesch, C. (2016). Going to extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870–2014. European Economic Review, 88(September), 227–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Garmur, M., King, G., Mukerjee, Z., Persily, N., & Silverman, B. (2019). CrowdTangle platform and API. Harvard Dataverse, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SCCQYD
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27(15), 2865–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Lee, D., & Guo, J. (2015). Stan: A probabilistic programming language for bayesian inference and optimization. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 40(5), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998615606113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459387
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2019). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, M. (2003). Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4), 432–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003251176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., Melnikov, N., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2021). 3G Internet and confidence in government. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2533–2613. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2022). The political economy of populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753–832. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J.-M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2022). Discontentment trumps Euphoria: Interacting with European politicians’ migration-related messages on social media. New Media & Society, 26(3), 1544–1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221074648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., & Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2020). Stuck in a nativist spiral: Content, selection, and effects of right-wing populists’ communication on facebook. Political Communication, 37(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661890
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., Schmuck, D., & Matthes, J. (2019). What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1445273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszár, F., Ira Ktena, S., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., & Hardt, M. (2022). Algorithmic amplification of politics on twitter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(1), e2025334119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025334119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (2022). Politicising immigration in times of crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(2), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., Sandberg, L., & Spierings, N. (2020). Twitter and Facebook: Populists’ double-barreled gun? New Media & Society, 22(4), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2018, March). A populist paradise? Examining populists’ twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681–1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1449883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeroense, T., Luimers, J., Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2021, January). Political social media use and its linkage to populist and postmaterialist attitudes and vote intention in the Netherlands. European Political Science, 21(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00306-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, P., Maurer, M., & Hassler, J. (2020). Populism fuels love and anger: The impact of message features on users’ reactions on facebook. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2081–2102. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2019). Digital media and the surge of political outsiders: Explaining the success of political challengers in the United States, Germany, and China. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119875439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevin, R., Whitesell, A., & Lee Hannah, A. (2022). Facebook algorithm changes may have amplified local republican parties. Research & Politics, 9(2), 205316802211038. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680221103809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., Koc-Michalska, K., & Russmann, U. (2023). Are campaigns getting uglier, and who is to blame? Negativity, dramatization and populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP election campaigns. Political Communication, 40(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2133198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and stan (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2016). Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on facebook. New Media & Society, 18(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2020). Right-wingers on the rise online: Insights from the 2018 Swedish elections. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2108–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. (2022). Picture-perfect populism: Tracing the rise of European populist parties on facebook. New Media & Society, 24(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820963777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2014). Triumph of the underdogs? Comparing twitter use by political actors during two Norwegian election campaigns. Sage Open, 4(4), 2158244014559015. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014559015
   Google Scholar
• Lev-On, A., & Haleva-Amir, S. (2018). Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning. New Media & Society, 20(2), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I., Johnson, R., & Stewart, B. M. (2021). What is your estimand? Defining the target quantity connects statistical evidence to theory. American Sociological Review, 86(3), 532–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224211004187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. J., & Zaslove, A. (2020, July). Measuring populism in political parties: Appraisal of a new approach. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 372–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momigliano, A. (2018). League’s salvini: Center right ready to run Italy. Politico. March 5, 2018. https://www.politico.eu/article/matteo-salvini-leagues-center-right-ready-to-run-italy/
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, L., Cristian, V., & Augusto, V. (2015). An internet-fuelled party? The movimento 5 stelle and the web. In F. Tronconi (Ed.), Beppe grillo’s five star movement: Organisation, communication and ideology (pp. 127–152). Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x/full
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is populism?. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2020). Reuters institute digital news report 2020. Reuters institute for the study of journalism. https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/survey/2020/overview-key-findings-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2020). Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics, 26(6), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820927686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2021). Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-070220-032416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzhyn, A., Sofia Cardenal, A., & Batlle Rubio, A. (2022). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, 25(November), 3165–3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2015, July). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., Pirro, A. L. P., Halikiopoulou, D., Froio, C., Van Kessel, S., De Lange, S. L., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2023, September). The PopuList: A database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties using expert-informed qualitative comparative classification (EiQCC). British Journal of Political Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123423000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooij, E. A. D., Stecuła, D. A., & Pickup, M. A. (2022). Populist media diets. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 975–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub, M., & Morisi, D. (2020). Voter mobilisation in the echo chamber: Broadband internet and the rise of populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 752–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Catran, A. W., & Fairbrother, M. (2016). The random effects in multilevel models: Getting them wrong and getting them right. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. A., Nelimarkka, M., & Olof Larsson, A. (2022). Populist platform strategies: A comparative study of social media campaigning by Nordic right-wing populist parties. Information, Communication & Society, 26(16), 3218–3236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, B., Bafumi, J., Keele, L., & Park, D. (2007). A bayesian multilevel modeling approach to time-series cross-sectional data. Political Analysis, 15(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpm006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B. C., & Proksch, S.-O. (2020, September). Fake it ‘Til you make it: A natural experiment to identify European politicians’ benefit from twitter bots. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sina, B., & Wirz, D. S. (2019). Populist and popular: An experiment on the drivers of user reactions to populist posts on facebook. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119890062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, P. (2018). The political economy of populism: An empirical investigation. Comparative Economic Studies, 60(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-018-0059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve, R., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2024292118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024292118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., Posch, L., Bleier, A., & Strohmaier, M. (2017). When populists become popular: Comparing Facebook use by the right-wing movement pegida and German political parties. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1365–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank, D., & Betz, H.-G. (2003). Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 1(2), 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.2.215
   Google Scholar
• Thomeczek, J. P. (2023). Political communication on facebook: Do populist parties send out more posts?. Party Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231184626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 28(4), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C. (2017). Online mobilization in comparative perspective: Digital appeals and political engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Political Communication, 34(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1201558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2016). Party campaigners or citizen campaigners? How social media deepen and broaden party-related engagement. The International Journal of Press/politics, 21(3), 294–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, S., & Castelein, R. (2016). Shifting the blame. Populist politicians’ use of twitter as a tool of opposition. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v12i2.709
   Google Scholar
• Western, B. (1998). Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: A bayesian hierarchical modelling approach. American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 1233. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Zulianello, M. (2020). Varieties of populist parties and party systems in Europe: From state-of-the-art to the application of a novel classification scheme to 66 parties in 33 Countries. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar