Defending Democracy: Prioritizing the Study of Epistemic Inequalities

References

• Amnå, E., & Ekman, J. (2014). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391300009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson E. (2012). Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgesius, F. J. Z., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Bodó, B., Vreese, C. H. D., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/should-we-worry-about-filter-bubbles
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2005). Neoliberalism and the end of liberal democracy. In J. S. Butler (Ed.), Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics (pp. 37–59). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2021). Echo chambers? Filter bubbles? The misleading metaphors that obscure the real problem. In I. M. Pérez-Escolar & J. M. Noguera-Vivo (Eds.), Hate speech and polarization in participatory society (pp. 33–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109891-4
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2023). From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S.(2024). Contemporary democratic theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2021). The basis of political equality. In I. T. Christiano (Eds.), Political epistemology (pp. 114–134). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2014). Communicative capitalism and class struggle. spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures. https://spheres-journal.org/contribution/communicative-capitalism-and-class-struggle/
   Google Scholar
• Edenberg, E. (2021). The problem with disagreement on social media: Moral not epistemic. In E. Edenberg (Ed.), Political epistemology (pp. 259–279). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893338.003.0015
   Google Scholar
• Edenberg, E., & Hannon, M. (2021). Political epistemology (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. J. (2023). Democracy for busy people. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, N., & Titley, G. (2015). Mourning and longing: Media studies learning to let go of liberal democracy. European Journal of Communication, 30(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115597854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frega, R. (2018). The social ontology of democracy. Journal of Social Ontology, 4(2), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2018-0025
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagrčin, E., & Porten-Cheé, P. (2023). Between individual and collective social effort: Vocabularies of informed citizenship in different information environments. International Journal of Communication, 17, 1510–1529. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17240/4065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (2006). Government by the people, for the people—twenty-first century style. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot Kormelink, T., & Costera Meijer, I. (2020). A user perspective on time spent: Temporal experiences of everyday news use. Journalism Studies, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1639538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2022). Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und die deliberative Politik [A new structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics] (1st ed.). Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, M., & de Ridder, J. (Ed.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of political epistemology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. (2024). Citizen knowledge: Markets, experts, and the infrastructure of democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197681718.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (2011). Two kinds of unknowing. Hypatia, 26(2), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, H. (2023). Operationalizing distribution as a key concept for public sphere theory. A call for ethnographic sensibility of different social worlds. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemer, D. (2022). Technology of the oppressed: Inequity and the digital mundane in favelas of Brazil. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R., & Toff, B. (2022). Neither absent nor ambient: Incidental news exposure from the perspective of news avoiders in the UK, United States, and Spain. The International Journal of Press/politics, 29(3), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221103144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., Shah, D. V., & Friedland, L. A. (2011). A communicative approach to social capital. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M.(1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. (2022). Media-centric or politics-centric political communication research? Some reflections. Political Communication, 39(2), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1966598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar