Theta Functions for Lattices of SU(3) Hyper-Roots

References

• [Cappelli et al. 87] A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson, and J. -B. Zuber, “The ADE Classification of Minimal and A(1)1 Conformal Invariant Theories.” Commun. Math. Phys. 13 (1987), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• [Conway and Sloane 99] J. Conway and N. J. A. Sloane, Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups, third edition. New York: Springer, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• [Coquereaux 14] R. Coquereaux, “Quantum McKay Correspondence and Global Dimensions for Fusion and Module-Categories Associated with Lie Groups.” J. Algebra 398 (2014), 258–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Coquereaux XX] R. Coquereaux, “Fusion Graphs.” Available online (http://www.cpt.univ-mrs.fr/coque/quantumfusion/FusionGraphs.html), 2009.
   Google Scholar
• [Coquereaux et al. 06] R. Coquereaux, D. Hammaoui, G. Schieber, and E. H. Tahri, “Comments About Quantum Symmetries of SU(3) Graphs.” J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2006), 269–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Coquereaux and Schieber 07] R. Coquereaux and G. Schieber, “Orders and Dimensions for sl2 or sl3 Module-Categories and Boundary Conformal Field Theories on a Torus.” J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007), 043511. Available online (http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0610073).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Coquereaux and Zuber 16] R. Coquereaux and J.-B. Zuber, “On Some Properties of SU(3) Fusion Coefficients.” Contribution to Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, special issue in memory of Raymond Stora. Nucl. Phys. B., 912C (2016), 119–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Deza and Grishukhin 95] M. Deza and V. Grishukhin, “Delaunay Polytopes of Cut Lattices.” Linear Algebra Appl. 226–228 (1995), 667–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Di Francesco et al. 97] P. Di Francesco, P. Matthieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory. New York: Springer, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• [Di Francesco and Zuber 90] P. Di Francesco, and J.-B. Zuber, “SU(N) Lattice Integrable Models Associated with Graphs,” Nucl. Phys. B 338 (1990), 602–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Dorey 93] P. Dorey, “Partition Functions, Intertwiners and the Coxeter Element.’ Int. J. Mod. Phys A8 (1993), 193–208. arXiv:hep-th/9205040.
   Google Scholar
• [Evans and Pugh 09] D. E. Evans and M. Pugh, “Ocneanu Cells and Boltzmann Weights for the SU(3) ADE Graphs.” Münster J. Math. 2 (2009), 95–142.
   Google Scholar
• [Finkelberg 96] M. Finkelberg, “An Equivalence of Fusion Categories.” Geom. Funct. Anal. 6 (1996), 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Huang 05] Y.-Z. Huang, “Vertex Operator Algebras, the Verlinde Conjecture, and Modular Tensor Categories.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005), 5352–5356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Kac 90] V. Kac, Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• [Kazhdan and Lusztig 94] D. Kazhdan and G. Lusztig, “Tensor Structures Arising from Affine Lie Algebras, III.” J. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1994), 335–381.
   Google Scholar
• [Kirillov and Ostrik 02] A. Kirillov and V. Ostrik, “On q-Analog of McKay Correspondence and ADE Classification of SL2 Conformal Field Theories.” Adv. Math. 171-2 (2002), 183–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Ocneanu 99] A. Ocneanu, “Paths on Coxeter Diagrams: From Platonic Solids and Singularities to Minimal Models and Subfactors, Notes by Goto S.” in Lectures on Operator Theory, Fields Institute Monographs, edited by R. Bhat, et al., pp. 243–323. Providence, RI: AMS Publications, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• [Ocneanu 00a] A. Ocneanu, “The Classification of Subgroups of Quantum SU(N).” in, Quantum Symmetries in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, Bariloche 2000, vol. 294, edited by R. Coquereaux, A. García, and R. Trinchero, pp. 133–160. Providence, RI: AMS Contemporary Mathematics., 2000.
   Google Scholar
• [Ocneanu 00b] A. Ocneanu, “Higher Coxeter systems.” Available online (http://www.msri.org/publications/ln/msri/2000/subfactors/ocneanu), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• [Ocneanu XXa] A. Ocneanu, Poster communications, Penn State Department of Mathematics, State College, PA.
   Google Scholar
• [Ocneanu XXb] A. Ocneanu, Book to appear (work in progress).
   Google Scholar
• [Ostrik 03] V. Ostrik, “Module Categories, Weak Hopf Algebras and Modular Invariants.” Transform. Groups 8: 2 (2003), 177–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Plesken and Pohst XX] W. Plesken and M. Pohst, “Constructing Integral Lattices with Prescribed Minimum.” Math. Comput. 45: 171 (1985), 209–221, and supplement S5–S16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Wieb et al. 97] B. Wieb, C. John, and P. Catherine, “The Magma Algebra System. I. The User Language.” J. Symb. Comput. 24 (1997), 235–265. Available online (http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Wolfram Research 10] Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research, Inc., 2010.
   Google Scholar
• [Zagier 08] D. B. Zagier, “Elliptic Modular Forms and Their Applications.” in The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms: Lectures at a Summer School in Nordfjordeid, Norway, (2004), pp. 1–103, edited by K. Ranestad. New York: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar