Non-Existence and Finiteness Results for Teichmüller Curves in Prym Loci

References

• Aulicino, D, Nguyen, D.-M. (2016). Rank two affine manifolds in genus three. J. Differ. Geom. 20(5): 2837–2904. doi:https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2016.20.2837
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, M. (2007). Euler characteristics of Teichmüller curves in genus two. Geom. Topol. 11: 1887–2073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, M., Habegger, P, Möller, M. (2016). Teichmüller curves in genus three and just likely intersections in Gmn×Gan. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 124: 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, M, Möller, M. (2012). The Deligne-Mumford compactification of the real multiplication locus and Teichmüller curves in genus 3. Acta Math. 208(1): 1–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calta, K, Smillie, J. (2008). Algebraically periodic translation surfaces. J. Mod. Dyn. 2(2): 209–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D, Möller, M. (2013). Nonvarying sums of Lyapunov exponents of Abelian differentials in low genus. Geom. Topol. 16(4): 2427–2479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvornicich, R, Zannier, U. (2000). On sums of roots of unity. Monatsh. Math. 129(2): 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskin, A., Filip, S, Wright, A. (2018). The algebraic hull of the Kontsevich-Zorich cocycle. Ann. Math. 188: 281–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskin, A, Mirzakhani, M. (2013). Invariant and stationary measures for the SL(2,R) action on moduli space. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 127: 95–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-018-0099-2
   Google Scholar
• Eskin, A., Mirzakhani, M, Mohammadi, A. (2015). Isolation, equidistribution, and orbit closures for the SL(2,R) action on moduli space. Ann. Math. 2: 673–721.
   Google Scholar
• Hamenstaedt, U. (2017). Typical and atypical properties of periodic Teichmüller geodesics. arXiv: 1409.5978, revised version.
   Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E, Nguyen, D.-M. (2014). Teichmüller curves generated by Weierstrass Prym eigenforms in genus 3 and genus 4. J. Topol. 7(2): 475–522.
   Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E, Nguyen, D.-M. (2016). Complete periodicity of Prym eigenforms. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 4: 87–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E, Nguyen, D.-M. (2016). GL+(2,R)-orbits in Prym eigenform loci. Geom. Topol. 20(3): 1359–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E, Nguyen, D.-M. (2017). Weierstrass Prym eigenforms in genus four. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 1–41. Cambridge University Press arXiv: DS/1802.04879.
   Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E, Nguyen, D.-M. (2018). Connected components of Prym eigenform loci in genus three. Math. Ann. 371(1-2): 753–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanneau, E., Nguyen, D.-M, Wright, A. (2015). Finiteness of Teichmüller curves in non-arithmetic rank 1 orbit closures. Amer. J. Math. 139(6): 1449–1463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.2017.0036. arXiv: DS/1504.03742.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, H. B. (1965). On linear relations between roots of unity. Mathematika. 12: 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheus, C, Wright, A. (2015). Hodge-Teichmüller planes and finiteness results for Teichmüller curves. Duke Math. J. 164(6): 1041–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, C. (2003). Teichmüller geodesics of infinite complexity. Acta Math. 191(2): 191–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, C. (2005). Teichmüller curves in genus two: discriminant and spin. Math. Ann. 333(1): 87–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, C. (2006). Prym varieties and Teichmüller curves. Duke Math. J. 133(3): 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, C. (2006). Teichmüller curves in genus two: torsion divisors and ratios of sines. Invent. Math. 165(3): 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M. (2006). Periodic points on Veech surfaces and the Mordell-Weil group over a Teichmüller curve. Invent. Math. 165(3): 633–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M. (2006). Variations of Hodge structures of a Teichmüller curve. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19(2): 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, M. (2008). Finiteness results for Teichmüller curves. Ann. Inst. Fourier. 58(1): 63–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukamel, R. (2014). Orbifold points on Teichmüller curves and Jacobians with complex multiplication. Geom. Topol. 18: 779–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Teigell, D, Zachhuber, J. (2016). Orbifold points on Prym-Teichmüller curves in genus four. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu 18(4): 673–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474748017000196. arXiv:/1609.00144.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Teigell, D, Zachhuber, J. (2018). Orbifold points on Prym-Teichmüller curves in genus 3. Int. Math. Res. Notices. 4: 1228–1280.
   Google Scholar