Numerical and experimental evaluation of the receiving performance of meander-line coil EMATs

References

• FrostHM. Electromagnetic ultrasound transducers: principles, practice and applications. In: ThurstonRN, PierceAD, editors. Physical acoustics. Vol. XIV. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1979. p. 176–276.
   Google Scholar
• ThompsonRB. Physical principles of measurements with EMAT transducers. In: MasonWP, ThurstonRN, editors. Physical acoustics. Vol. XIX. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1990. p. 157–200.
   Google Scholar
• AlersGA. Noncontact ultrasonic testing with electromagnetic acoustic transducers. In: ZuechN, editor. Handbook of intelligent sensors for industrial automation. New York, NY: Addison Wesley; 1992. p. 285–306.
   Google Scholar
• HiraoM, OgiH. EMATs for science and industry: noncontacting ultrasonic measurements. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• MaxfieldBW, FortunkoCM. The design and use of electromagnetic acoustic wave transducer (EMATs). Mater Eval. 1983;41:1399–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlersGA, BumsLR. EMAT designs for special applications. Mater Eval. 1987;45:1184–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HiraoM, OgiH. An SH-wave EMAT technique for gas pipeline inspection. NDT&E Int. 1999;32(3):127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-ValleF, DixonS. Initial tests for designing a high temperature EMAT with pulsed electromagnet. NDT&E Int. 2010;43(2):171–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DixonS, EdwardsC, PalmerSB. High accuracy non-contact ultrasonic thickness gauging of aluminium sheet using electromagnetic acoustic transducers. Ultrasonics. 2001;39(6):445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DobbsER. Electromagnetic generation of ultrasonic waves. In: MasonWP, ThurstonRN, editors. Physical acoustics. Vol. X. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1973. p. 127–189.
   Google Scholar
• JianX, DixonS, GuoN, EdwardsRS. Rayleigh wave interaction with surface-breaking cracks. J Appl Phys. 2007;101(6):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LudwigR, DaiXW. Numerical simulation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer in the time domain. J Appl Phys. 1991;69(1):89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KawashimaK. Quantitative calculation and measurement of longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic wave pulses in solid. IEEE Trans Son Ultrason. 1984;SU-31(2):83–94.
   Google Scholar
• OgiH. Field dependence of coupling efficiency between electromagnetic field and ultrasonic bulk waves. J Appl Phys. 1997;82(8):3940–3949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JianX, DixonS, EdwardsRS, ReedJ. Coupling mechanism of electromagnetic acoustical transducers for ultrasonic generation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119(5):2693–2701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShapoorabadiRJ, KonradA, SinclairAN. The governing electrodynamic equations of electromagnetic acoustic transducers. J Appl Phys. 2005;97(10):10E102.
   Google Scholar
• WangSJ, KangL, LiZC, ZhaiGF, ZhangL. 3-D modeling and analysis of meander-line-coil surface wave EMATs. Mechatronics. 2012;22(6):653–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JianX, DixonS, GrattanKTV, EdwardsRS. A model for pulsed Rayleigh wave and optimal EMAT design. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2006;128(2):296–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JianX, DixonS, QuirkK, GrattanKTV. Electromagnetic acoustic transducers for in- and out-of plane ultrasonic wave detection. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2008;148(1):51–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShapoorabadiRJ, KonradA, SinclairAN. Computation of current densities in the receiving mode of electromagnetic acoustic transducers. J Appl Phys. 2005;97(10):10Q106.
   Google Scholar
• KaltenbacherM, EttingerK, LerchR. Finite element analysis of coupled electromagnetic acoustic systems. IEEE Trans Magn. 1999;35(3):1610–1613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LudwigR, YouZ, PalanisamyR. Numerical simulations of an electromagnetic acoustic transducer-receiver system for NDT applications. IEEE Trans Magn. 1993;29(3):2081–2089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DhayalanR, BalasubramaniamK. A hybrid finite element model for simulation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) based plate waves. NDT&E Int. 2010;43(6):519–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DhayalanR, BalasubramaniamK. A two-stage finite element model of a meander coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer transmitter. Nondestr Test Eval. 2011;26(2):101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RibichiniR, CeglaF, NagyPB, CawleyP. Quantitative modeling of the transduction of electromagnetic acoustic transducers operating on ferromagnetic media. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010;57(12):2808–2817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar