Performance evaluation of the neural networks for moisture detection using GPR

References

• Walker R. Issues current UK bridges. Seminar on Assessment and Maintenance of Concrete Highway Bridges; 2010 April; Proceedings of 8th International Seminar on Issues current UK bridges; London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• SollaM, LorenzoH, RiveiroB, RialFI. Non-destructive methodologies in the assessment of the masonry arch bridge of Traba, Spain. Eng Fail Anal. 2011;18(3):828–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CopeRJ. Concrete bridge engineering performance and advances. ISBN-10: 1851661107, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Aït-MokhtarA, BelarbiR, BenboudjemaF, BurlionN, CapraB, PoyetS. Experimental investigation of the variability of concrete durability properties. Cem Concr Res. 2013;45:21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BalayssacJP, LaurensS, ArliguieG, BreysseD, GarnierV, DérobertX. Description of the general outlines of the French project SENSO, quality assessment and limits of different NDT methods. Constr Build Mater. 2012;35:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RashidiM, GibsonP. Proposal of a methodology for bridge condition assessment. Australasian Transport Research Forum Proceedings; 2011 September 28–30; Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• VaghefiK, ReneeCO, DevinKH, AsceAM, Theresa (Tess)MA, AsceM, ColinNB, ArthurKE, ChristopherR, RobertS, JosephWB, RichardD. Evaluation of commercially available remote sensors for highway bridge condition assessment. J Bridge Eng. 10.1061/ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000. American Society of Civil Engineers 2012.
   Google Scholar
• NguyenNT, SbartaïZ-M, LatasteJ-F, BreysseD, BosF. Assessing the spatial variability of concrete structures using NDT techniques – laboratory tests and case study. Constr Build Mater. 2013;49:240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alani AM, Kilic G, Aboutalebi M. Applications of ground penetrating radar in bridge health monitoring using different frequency antennae systems. EGU General Assembly; Vienna, Austria; 2012; p. 12179.
   Google Scholar
• AlaniAM, AboutalebiM, KilicG. Applications of ground penetrating radar (GPR) in bridge deck monitoring and assessment. J Appl Geophys. 2013;97:45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlaniAM, AboutalebiM, KilicG.Integrated health assessment strategy using NDT for reinforced concrete bridges. NDT&E Int.2014;61:80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnnanAP, CoswaySW, De SouzaT. Application of GPR to map concrete to delineate embedded structural elements & defects. In: KoppenjanSK, LeeH, editors. Ninth international conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. Vol. 4758. Santa Barbara (CA): SPIE; 2002. p. 354–358.
   Google Scholar
• ParrilloR, RobertsR. Bridge deck condition assessment using ground penetrating radar. European conference on Nondestructive Testing (ECNDT). Berlin, Germany; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhan K. Application of advanced non-destructive testing methods on bridge health assessment and analysis [Ph.D. thesis]. London: University of Greenwich2013.
   Google Scholar
• AmosW, TorgashovE, AndersonN. Bridge deck assessment using ground penetrating radar (GPR). Symp Appl Geophys Eng Environ Probl Nondestr Eval Infrastruct. 2009;22: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• YuJ, ZiehlP, ZárateB, CaicedoJ. Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission. J Constr Steel Res. 2011;67(8):1254–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MccannDM, FordeMC. Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT&E Int. 2001;34:71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BungeyJH. Sub-surface radar testing of concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2004;18:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottaM, RezaizadehaA, DelahazabA, SantoscCG, MooredM, GraybealeB, WasherfG. A comparison of non-destructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment. NDT&E Int. 2003;36:245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GucunskiN, RomeroF, KruschwitzS, FeldmannR, ParvardehH. Comprehensive bridge deck deterioration mapping of nine bridges by ground penetrating radar and impact echo. Iowa Highway Research Board, Nondestructive Evaluation Technologies; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• HsiaoC, ChengC-C, LiouT, JuangY. Detecting flaws in concrete blocks using the impact-echo method. NDTE Int. 2008;41:98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SollaM, LorenzoH, NovoA, CaamañoJC. Structural analysis of the Roman Bibei bridge (Spain) based on GPR data and numerical modelling. Automat Constr. 2012;22:334–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCK. Republic of Turkiye, General Directorate of Highways, Site Collection Documents, KGM documents, Istatistikler, Kopru ve Tunel Bilgileri ; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Google Earth Maps. Case Study Bridge 41°42′39.17″N, 27°26′11.30″W, elevation ; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• JolHM. Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• MastersT. Practical, neural network recipes in C++. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• MougiakakouSGr, GousiasI, NicolaidesAN, NikitaKS. Computer-aided diagnosis of carotid atherosclerosis based on ultrasound image statistics, laws' texture and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 :26–36. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar