Significance of GPR polarisation for improving target detection and characterisation

References

• DanielsDJ. Ground penetrating radar. London: Peter Peregrinus Ltd; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• HugenschmidtJ, MastrangeloR. GPR inspection of concrete bridges. Cement Concrete Comp. 2006;28:384–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SgambiL, GkoumasK, BontempiF. Genetic algorithm optimization of precast hollow core slabs. Comput Concrete. 2014;13(3):389–409.
   Google Scholar
• GaravagliaE, PizzigoniA, SgambiL, BassoN. Collapse behaviour in reciprocal space frame structures. Struct Eng Mech. 2014;46(4):533–547.
   Google Scholar
• XuX, ZengQ, LiD, WuJ, WuX, ShenJ. GPR detection of several common subsurface voids inside dikes and dams. Eng Geol. 2010;111:31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnnanAP, CoswaySW, DeSouzaT. Application of GPR to map concrete to delineate embedded structural elements and defects. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2002 April 29–May 2;Santa Barbara, CA (USA); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• BindaL, CantiniL, LualdiM, TedeschiC, SaisiA, ZanziL. Investigation on structures and materials of the Castle of Avio (Trento, Italy). Adv Archit. 2005;20:599–610.
   Google Scholar
• BindaL, LualdiM, SaisiA, ZanziL. Radar investigation as a complementary tool for the diagnosis of historic masonry buildings. Int J Mater Struct Integrity. 2011;5:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• BindaL, LualdiM, SaisiA. Investigation strategies for the diagnosis of historic structures: on-site tests on Avio Castle, Italy and Pišece Castle, Slovenia. Can J Civil Eng. 2008;35:555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BindaL, ZanziL, LualdiM, CondoleoP. The use of georadar to assess damage to a Masonry Bell Tower in Cremona Italy. NDT&E Int. 2004;38:171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LualdiM, ZanziL. GPR investigations to reconstruct the geometry of the wooden structures in historical buildings. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2002 April 29–May 2;Santa Barbara, CA (USA); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM, ZanziL, SosioG. A 3D GPR survey methodology for archaeological applications. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2006 June 19–22;Columbus, OH (USA); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM, ZanziL. 2D and 3D experiments to explore the potential benefit of GPR investigations in planning the mining activity of a limestone quarry. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2004 June 21–24;Delft, NL; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM, ZanziL. Testing a safe acquisition procedure for an effective application of GPR to security operations. Proceedings of 11th Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems; 2005 April 3–7;Atlanta, GA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• BernsteinR, OristaglioM, MillerDE, HaldorsenJ. Imaging radar maps underground objects in 3-D. IEEE Comput Appl Power. 2000;13:20–24.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM, BindaL, ZanziL. Acquisition and processing requirements for high quality 3D reconstructions from GPR investigations. Proceedings of International Symposium on Non Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering; 2003 September 16–19;NDT-C, Berlin, DE; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• DanielsDJ, WielopolskiL, RadzeviciusSJ, BooksharJ. 3D GPR polarization analysis for imaging complex objects. Proceedings of 16th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems; 2003 April 6–10; San Antonio, TX (USA); 2003.
   Google Scholar
• BalanisCA. Antenna theory: analysis and design. New York (NY): Wiley; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• BeckmannP. The depolarization of electromagnetic waves. Vol. 1. Boulder: Golem Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• BalanisCA. Advanced engineering electromagnetics. New York (NY): Wiley; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• GuyED, DanielsJJ, RadzeviciusSJ. Demonstration of using crossed dipole GPR antennae for site characterization. Geophys Res Lett. 1999; 26: 3421–3424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadzeviciusSJ, GuyED, DanielsJJ, VendlMA. Significance of crossed-dipole antennas for high noise environments. Proceedings of Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems; 2000 February 20–24;Denver, CO (USA); 2000.
   Google Scholar
• RadzeviciusSJ, GuyED, DanielsJJ. Pitfalls in GPR data interpretation: differentiating stratigraphy and buried objects from periodic antenna and target effects. Geophys Res Lett. 2000;27:3393–3396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StreichR, Van der KrukJ. Accurate imaging of multicomponent GPR data based on exact radiation patterns. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2007;45:93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der KrukJ, ZeemanJH, GroenenboomJ. Multicomponent imaging of different objects with different strike orientation. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2002 April 29–May 2; Santa Barbara, CA (USA); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• BönigerU, TronickeJ. Subsurface utility extraction and characterization: combining GPR symmetry and polarization attributes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2012;50:736–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der KrukJ, WapenaarCPA, FokkemaJT, Van den BergPM. Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground penetrating radar data. Geophysics. 2003;68:1241–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadzeviciusSJ, DanielsDJ. Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders. J Appl Geophys. 2000;45:111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobertsRL, DanielsJJ. Analysis of GPR polarization phenomena. J Environ Eng Geophys. 1996;1:139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts RL. Analysis of theoretical modeling of GPR polarization phenomena [dissertation]. Columbus (OH): The Ohio State University;1994.
   Google Scholar
• ChenCC, HigginsMB, O'NeillK, DetschR. Ultrawide-bandwidth fully-polarimetric ground penetrating radar classification of subsurface unexploded ordnance. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2001;39:1221–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyoung-sunY, EvansM, KobashigawaJ, IskanderM. Advanced classification of UXO using fully polarimetric GPR and frequency-polarization features. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS); 2010 July 25–30; Honolulu, HI (USA); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM, LombardiF. Orthogonal polarization approach for three dimensional georadar surveys. NDT&E Int. 2013;60:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'NeillK, LusskyRFJr, PaulsenKD. Scattering from a metallic object embedded near the randomly rough surface of a lossy dielectric. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 1996;34(2):367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TsofliasGP, Van GestelJP, StoffaPL, BlankenshipDD, SenM. Vertical fracture detection by exploiting the polarization properties of ground-penetrating radar signals. Geophysics. 2004;69:803–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YilmazO. Seismic data analysis. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• LualdiM. True 3D acquisition using GPR over small areas: A cost effective solution. Proceedings of 16th Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems; 2011 April 10–14; Charleston, SC (USA); 2011.
   Google Scholar
• VillelaA, RomoJM. Invariant properties and rotation transformations of the GPR scattering matrix. J Appl Geophys. 2013;90:71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValenteM. Seismic performance assessment of a non-ductile RC building retrofitted by steel bracing or fiber-reinforced polymers. Appl Mech Mater. 2012;234:84–89.
   Google Scholar
• ValenteM. Seismic strengthening of non-ductile R/C structures using infill wall or ductile steel bracing. Adv Mater Res. 2013;602-604:1583–1587.
   Google Scholar