A robust damage-detection technique with environmental variability combining time-series models with principal components

References

• DoeblingSW, FarrarCR, PrimeMB. A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock Vib Digest. 1998;30(2):91–105.
   Google Scholar
• SohnH, FarrarCR, HemezFM, ShunkDD, StinematesSW, NadlerBR, CzarneckiJJ. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report. LA-13976-MS2004. California. http://www.institute.lanl.gov/ei/shm/pubs/LA_13976_MSa.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UhlT, OstachowiczW, Holnicki-SzulcJ, editors. Structural Health Monitoring 2008. Texas: CHIPS; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ChangF-K. Structural Health Monitoring 2007 – quantification, validation and implementation. Virginia, (USA): Air Force Office of Scientific Research; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• HuynhD, HeJ, TranD. Damage location vector: a non-destructive structural damage detection technique. Comput Struct. 2005;3(28–30):2353–2367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuH, LiL, HeX-Q. Damage detection method for shear buildings using the changes in the first mode shape slopes. Comput Struct. 2011;89(9–10):733–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TomaszewskaA. Influence of statistical errors on damage detection based on structural flexibility and mode shape curvature. Comput Struct. 2010;88(3–4):154–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuH, WuC, LuW-J. Damage detection of circular hollow cylinder using modal strain energy and scanning damage index methods. Comput Struct. 2011;89(1–2):149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeM, LuiEM. Structural damage identification using system dynamic properties. Comput Struct. 2005;83(27):2185–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Mohan RaoA, LakshmiK, VenkatachalamDhanya. Damage diagnostic technique for structural health monitoring using POD and self adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Comput Struct. 2012;106–107:228–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SohnH, FarrarCR. Damage diagnosis using time series analysis of vibration signals. Smart Mater Struct. 2001;10(3):446–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CardenEP, BrownjohnJMW. ARMA modeled time-series classification for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;22:295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhongS, OyadijiSO. Detection of cracks in simply-supported beams by continuous wavelet transform of reconstructed modal data. Comput Struct. 2011;89(1–2):27–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaoC, HaoH, LiZX, ZhuX. Time-varying system identificationusing a newly improved HHT algorithm. Comput Struct. 2009;7(23–24):1611–1623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiZX, YangXM. Damage identification for beams using ANN based on statistical property of structural responses. Comput Struct. 2008;86(1–2):64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeRS, HwangSF. Damage detection by an adaptive real-parameter simulated annealing genetic algorithm. Comput Struct. 2006;84(31–32):2231–2243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananda RaoM, SrinivasJ, MurthyBSN. Damage detection in vibrating bodies using genetic algorithms. Comput Struct. 2004;82(11–12):963–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsAA, ZhishenWu, Kammrujaman SerkerNHM. Assessment of vibration-based damage identification methods using displacement and distributed strain measurements. Struct Health Monit. 2009;8(6):443–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SohnH, CzarneckiA, FarrarCR. Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. ASCE J Struct Eng. 2000;126(11):1356–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SohnH, FarrarCR, HunterNF, WordenK. Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME. 2001;123:706–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangQW. Statistical damage identification for bridges using ambient vibration data. Comput Struct. 2007;85:476–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BodeuxJB, GolinvalJC. Application of ARMAV models to the identification and damage detection of mechanical and civil engineering structures. Smart Mater Struct. 2001;10:479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FugateML, SohnH, FarrarCR. Vibration-based damage detection using statistical process control. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2001;15(4):707–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NairKK, KiremidjianAS, LawKH. Time series based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J Sound Vib. 2006;291:349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hunter N, Worden K. Applying the LANL statistical pattern recognition monitoring on data from a surface-effect fast patrol boat. Report no. LA 13761-MS. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory2001.
   Google Scholar
• NohHY, NairKK, KiremidjianAS, LohCH. Application of time series based damage detection algorithms to the benchmark experiment at the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taipei. Taiwan. Smart Struct Syst. 2009;5(1):95–117.
   Google Scholar
• MattsonSG, PanditSM. Statistical moments of autoregressive model residuals for damage localization. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2006;20(3):627–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MosaviAmir A, DickeyD, SeracinoR, RizkallaS. Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2012;26:254–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SilvaS, Dias JuniorM, Lopes JuniorV. Damage detection in a benchmark structure using AR-ARX models and statistical pattern recognition. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2007;29:174–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoMS, KimKJ. Indirect imput identification in multi-source envioronments by principal component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2002;16(5):873–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JolliffeIT. Principal component analysis. Series: Springer Series in Statistics. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Springer; 2002. XXIX 487:28. ISBN 978-0-387-95442-4.
   Google Scholar
• BoxGEP, JenkinsGM, ReinselGC. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. 3rd ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• LjungL. System identification: theory for the user. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• WordenK, MansonG, FiellerNRJ. Damage detection using outlier analysis. J Sound Vib. 2000;229:647–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar