Acoustic emission studies for characterization of fatigue crack growth behavior in HSLA steel

References

• Paris PC, Erdogan F. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Trans. ASME J. Basic Eng. 1963;85:528–533.10.1115/1.3656900
   Google Scholar
• Birkbeck G, Inckle AE, Waldron GWJ. Aspects of stage-II fatigue crack propagation in low-carbon steel. J. Mater. Sci. 1971;6:319–323.10.1007/BF02403099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda C, Ohta A, Nishijima S, Sasaki E. Fatigue striation in a wide range of crack propagation rates up to 70 μm/cycle in a ductile structural steel. J. Mater. Sci. 1980;15:1663–1670.10.1007/BF00550582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberg GM. Stage II fatigue crack growth. Int. J. Fatigue. 1984;6:229–242.10.1016/0142-1123(84)90054-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KS. Scaling laws for fatigue crack. Metall. Trans. A. 1993;24:2473–2486.10.1007/BF02646526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KS, Yi-Ming P, Davidson D, Craig McClung R. Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in HSLA-80 steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 1997;222:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz PE, Braglia BL,Hertzberg RW. Weldments: physical metallurgy and failure phenomena. In: Proceedings of 5th Bolton Landing Conference; New York, USA; 1979; p. 271.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg RW, Goodenow RH. Microalloying’75. Niagara Falls, NY: Union Carbide Corp; 1981; p. 503.
   Google Scholar
• Todd JA, Tao H, Chen L, Yankov EY. A comparison of the near-threshold corrosion fatigue crack propagation rates in mil S-24645 HSLA steel and its weld metal. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 1993;115:131–136.10.1115/1.2920102
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaumer AC, Dexter RJ, Fisher JW, Kaufman EJ. Fracture mechanics. Vol. 25, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), (eds. Erdogan F, Hartranft RJ, editors) Philadelphia, PA; 1994; 518 p.
   Google Scholar
• Nondestructive testing handbook. Vol. 5, Acoustic emission testing, Columbus, OH: American Society for Nondestructive Testing; 1987; 518 p.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM Standard E 569, standard practice for acoustic emission monitoring of structures during controlled stimulation. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Vol. 03.03, Nondestructive testing. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM; 1995; 228–231.
   Google Scholar
• Heiple CR, Carpenter SH. Acoustic emissionproduced by deformation of metals and alloys: a review: Parts I and II. J. Acoust. Emission. 1987;6:215–237.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts TM, Talebzadeh M. Fatigue life prediction based on crack propagation and acoustic emission count rates. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2003;59:679–694.10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00065-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZF, Li J, Ke W, Zhu Z. Characteristics of acoustic emission for A537 structural steel during fatigue crack propagation. Scripta Metall. Mater. 1992;27:641–646.10.1016/0956-716X(92)90354-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthy V, Jayakumar T, Baldev R. Influence of microstructure on acoustic emission behavior during stage 2 fatigue crack growth in solution annealed, thermally aged and weld specimens of AISI type 316 stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 1996; 212:273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaswal V, Sasikala G, Ray SK, Mannan SL, Raj B. Fatigue crack growth mechanism in aged 9Cr–1Mo steel: threshold and Paris regimes. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2005;395:251–264.10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JP, Mukhopadhyay CK, Jayakumar T, Mannan SL, Raj B. Understanding fatigue crack propagation in AISI 316 (N) weld using Elber’s crack closure concept: experimental results from GCMOD and acoustic emission techniques. Int. J. Fatigue. 2007;29:2170–2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H, Han EH, Wzang JQ, Ke W. Acoustic emission study of fatigue crack closure of physical short and long cracks for aluminum alloy LY12CZ. Int. J. Fatigue. 2009;31:403–407.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Z, Luo H, Cao J, Wang H. Acoustic emission during fatigue crack propagation in a micro-alloyed steel and welds. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2011;528:7751–7756.10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhiyuan H, Hongyun L, Yubo Z, Jingwei C. Effects of micro-structure on fatigue crack propagation and acoustic emission behaviors in a micro-alloyed steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2013;559:534–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellyin F, Li HP. Fatigue crack growth in large specimens with various stress ratios. Trans. ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 1984;106:255–260.10.1115/1.3264340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu KC, Lin CK. Effects of R-ratio on high temperature fatigue crack growth behavior of a precipitation-hardening stainless steel. Int. J. Fatigue. 2008;30:2147–2155.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves Beltrao MA, Castrodeza EM, Bastian FL. Fatigue crack propagation in API 5L X-70 pipeline steel longitudinal welded joints under constant and variable amplitudes. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mat. Struct. 2011;34:321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates, E647-08e1. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Philadelphia (PA): ASTM; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Masuda C, Nishijima S. The generalized relationship between the parameters C and m of Paris' law for fatigue crack growth. Scripta Metall. 1981;15:259–264.10.1016/0036-9748(81)90340-9
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Matsuoka S. A tentative explanation for two parameters, C and m, in Paris equation of fatigue crack growth. Int. J. Fract. 1977;13:563–583.10.1007/BF00017293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris DO, Dunegan HL. Continuous monitoring of fatigue-crack growth by acoustic-emission techniques. Exp. Mech. 1974;14:71–81.10.1007/BF02323130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK, Kang IW. Effect of superimposed monotonic fracture modes on the ΔK and Kmax parameters of fatigue crack propagation. Acta Mater. 2003;51:399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Ziehl P Jr. Stable and unstable fatigue prediction for A572 structural steel using acoustic emission of constructional steel. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2012;77:173–179.10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaulow C, Burget W. The emission of rayleigh waves from brittle fracture initiation, and the possible effect of the reflected waves on crack arrest. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 1990;13:327–346.10.1111/ffe.1990.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushell AC, Edwards C, Palmer SB. Laser-generated surface waves on plates of varying thickness. British J. NDT. 1990; 33:177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar