Investigating ultrasound imaging in the frequency domain for tissue characterisation

References

• Gilmore RS, Tam KC, Young JD, et al. Acoustic microscopy from 10 to 100 MHz for industrial applications [and discussion]. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. 1986;320:215–235.10.1098/rsta.1986.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall FC. Overview of the use of ultrasonic technologies in research on wood properties. Wood Sci. Technol. 2002;36:197–212.10.1007/s00226-002-0138-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo TL. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Boston (MA): Elsevier; 2004. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shull PJ, editor. Nondestructive evaluation: theory, techniques, and applications. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kossoff G, Fry E, Jellins J. Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1973;53:1730–1736.10.1121/1.1913526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Huang L, Duric N, et al. An improved automatic time-of-flight picker for medical ultrasound tomography. Ultrasonics. 2009;49:61–72.10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiskin J, Borup D, Johnson S, et al. Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010;131:3802–3813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jago JR, Whittingham TA. Experimental studies in transmission ultrasound computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 1991;36:1515–1527.10.1088/0031-9155/36/11/011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1981;28:177–185.10.1109/TBME.1981.324789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wear KA, Stuber AP, Reynolds JC. Relationships of ultrasonic backscatter with ultrasonic attenuation, sound speed and bone mineral density in human calcaneus. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2000;26:1311–1316.10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00267-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsekorn S, van Andel PW, Netzelmann U. Ultrasonic methods to detect and evaluate damage in steel. Nondestr. Test. Eval. 1998;15:373–393.10.1080/10589750008952880
   Google Scholar
• Krautkrämer J, Krautkrämer H. Ultrassonic testing of materials. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 533–534.10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8
   Google Scholar
• Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, et al. A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 1984;17:349–361.10.1016/0021-9290(84)90029-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason. Imaging. 1991;13:111–134.10.1177/016173469101300201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labyed Y, Bigelow TA. A theoretical comparison of attenuation measurement techniques from backscattered ultrasound echoes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011;129:2316–2324.10.1121/1.3559677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim HJ, Kwak H, Kim JH. Wave attenuation measurement technique for nondestructive evaluation of concrete. Nondestr. Test. Eval. 2012;27:81–94.10.1080/10589759.2011.606319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel IM, Wooh SC, Komsky I. Quantitative porosity characterization of composite materials by means of ultrasonic attenuation measurements. J. Nondestr. Eval. 1992;11:1–8.10.1007/BF00566012
   Google Scholar
• Oelze M, Zachary J. Examination of cancer in mouse models using high-frequency quantitative ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006;32:1639–1648.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadayyon H, Sadeghi-Naini A, Wirtzfeld L, et al. Quantitative ultrasound characterization of locally advanced breast cancer by estimation of its scatterer properties. Med. Phys. 2014;41:012903.10.1118/1.4852875
   Google Scholar
• Brand S, Solanki B, Foster D, et al. Monitoring of cell death in epithelial cells using high frequency ultrasound spectroscopy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2009;35:482–493.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bige Y, Hanfeng Z, Rong W. Analysis of microstructural alterations of normal and pathological breast tissue in vivo using the AR cepstrum. Ultrasonics. 2006;44: 211–215.10.1016/j.ultras.2005.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Abeyratne U. Wavelet transforms in estimating scatterer spacing from ultrasound echoes. Ultrasonics. 2000;38:688–692.10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00150-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira MHS, Gatts CEN, da Silva RR, et al. The use of ultrasonic guided waves and wavelets analysis in pipe inspection. Ultrasonics. 2004;41:785–797.10.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle TE, Factor RE, Ellefson CL, et al. High-frequency ultrasound for intraoperative margin assessments in breast conservation surgery: a feasibility study. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:1-15. 444.10.1186/1471-2407-11-444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bude R, Adler R. An easily made, low-cost, tissue-like ultrasound phantom material. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1995;23:271–273.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar