Characterising fundamental properties of foam concrete with a non-destructive technique

References

• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Kashani A. Glass waste versus sand as aggregates: the characteristics of the evolving geopolymer binders. J Clean Prod. 2018;193:593–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL. Alkali-activated materials. Cem Concr Res. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen T, Abdollahnejad Z, Yliniemi J, et al. One-part alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Res. 2018;103:21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K, Kunhanandan Nambiar EK, Indu Siva Ranjani G. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31(6):388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahidan S, Aminuddin E, Mohd Noor K, et al., Potential of hollow glass microsphere as cement replacement for lightweight foam concrete on thermal insulation performance. International Symposium on Civil and Environmental Engineering 2016 (ISCEE 2016), Wuhan, China; Vol 103; 2017, p 01014.
   Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Kashani A. Sustainable one-part geopolymer foams with glass fines versus sand as aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2018;171:223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan N, Ramamurthy K. Structure and properties of aerated concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos. 2000;22(5):321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P. How does aluminium foaming agent impact the geopolymer formation mechanism? Cem Concr Compos. 2017;80:277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, et al. Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams. Matr Des. 2017;120:255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra VM, Carino NJ. Handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva S, Sivahar V, Non-destructive evaluation of strength gain of ordinary Portland cement mortar by ultrasonic pulse velocity method, Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon),Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, 2016; IEEE. 2016, pp. 337–342.
   Google Scholar
• Maizuar M, Zhang L, Miramini S, et al. Detecting structural damage to bridge girders using radar interferometry and computational modelling. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2017;10(10):1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komlos̆ K, Popovics S, Nürnbergerová T, et al. Ultrasonic pulse velocity test of concrete properties as specified in various standards. Cem Concr Compos. 1996;18(5):357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, et al. Alkali activated slag foams: the effect of the alkali reaction on foam characteristics. J Clean Prod. 2017;147:330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P, et al. Pore characteristics in one-part mix geopolymers foamed by H2O2: the impact of mix design. Matr Des. 2017;130:381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Naik T, Malhotra V, Popovics J. The ultrasonic pulse velocity method, handbook on nondestructive testing of concrete. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2003. p. 182–200.
   Google Scholar
• Azhari H. Basics of biomedical ultrasound for engineers. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley-IEEE Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ensminger D, Bond LJ. Ultrasonics. [electronic resource] : fundamentals, technologies, and applications. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lafhaj Z, Goueygou M, Djerbi A, et al. Correlation between porosity, permeability and ultrasonic parameters of mortar with variable water/cement ratio and water content. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(4):625–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogas JA, Gomes MG, Gomes A. Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method. Ultrasonics. 2013;53(5):962–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrascano P, Callegari S, Montisci A, et al. Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems : industrial application issues. Cham: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Wang H. The pore characteristics of geopolymer foam concrete and their impact on the compressive strength and modulus. Front Mater. 2016;3:38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusinovic T, Sipusic J, Vrbos N. Porosity-strength relation in calcium aluminate cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2003;33(11):1801–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, et al. Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater. 2014;56:113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Mendis P. Enhancing the strength of pre-made foams for foam concrete applications. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;87:164–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navidi WC. Statistics for engineers and scientists. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Davraz M, Kilinçarslan Ş, Koru M, et al. Investigation of relationships between ultrasonic pulse velocity and thermal conductivity coefficient in foam concretes. Acta Physica Polonica A. 2016;130(1):469–470
   Google Scholar
• Nobile L. Prediction of concrete compressive strength by combined non-destructive methods. Meccanica. 2015;50(2):411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trtnik G, Kavčič F, Turk G. Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks. Ultrasonics. 2009;49(1):53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar