Nondestructive testing method and application for internal defect of metal balls

References

• Tondon N, Choudhury A. A review of vibration and acoustics measurement methods for the detection of defects in rolling element bearing. Tribol Int. 1999;32:469–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzalas MN, Harris TA. Fatigue failure and ball bearing friction. Tribol Trans. 2000;43:137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit S, Duquennoy M, Ouaftouh M, et al. Non-destructive testing of ceramic balls using high frequency ultrasonic resonance spectroscopy. Ultrasonics. 2005;43:802–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneuville F, Duquennoy M, Ouaftouh OM, et al. High frequency ultrasonic detection of C-crack defects in silicon nitride bearing balls. Ultrasonics. 2009;49:89–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do Y, Lee S, Kim Y. Vision-based surface defect inspection of metal balls. Meas Sci Technol. 2011;22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Dong S, Liang Y, et al. Modelling of a steel ball ’ s grade based on image texture features. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. 2001;215:1633–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng TW. Optical inspection of ball bearing defects. Meas Sci Technol. 2007;18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wang Z, Pei FY, et al. Improved illumination for vision-based defect inspection of highly reflective metal surface. Chin Opt Lett. 2013;11:021102–21105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuazza A, Brabazon D, El-Baradie MA. Multi-beam fibre-optic laser scanning system for surface defect recognition. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;155–156:2065–2070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CL, Ai CS, Li GP. Optical fiber sensor system for detecting the steel ball surface quality. Appl Mech Mater. 2014;654: 245–249. Trans Tech Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Xie F, Xiao L, Lu Y, et al. Research on an eddy current sensor used for steel ball surface defect detection. Transd Microsyst Technol. 2012;31:34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Song S, Park J, Kim YH, et al. Prediction of angle beam ultrasonic testing signals from a surface breaking crack in a plate using multi-gaussian beams and ray methods. AIP Conf Proc. 2004;700:110.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao XY, Gang T, Xu CG. Prediction of side-drilled hole signals captured by a dual crystal contact probe. J Nondestr Eval. 2010;29:105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen JJ, Breazeale MA. A diffraction beam field expressed as the superposition of Gaussian beams. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;83:1752–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmerr LW, Song J-S. Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems. New York: Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schmerr LW, Sedov A. The flat-bottom hole: an ultrasonic scattering model. Res Nondestr Eval. 1989;1:181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Schmerr LW. Ultrasonic transducer fields modeled with a modular multi-Gaussian beam and application to a contact angle beam testing. Res Nondestr Eval. 2008;19:87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao XY, Gang T, Zhang BX. An ultrasonic measurement model to predict the response from flat bottom hole for dual crystal contact probe. Acta Phys Sinica. 2008;57:5049–5055.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao XY, Gang T. Nonparaxial multi-Gaussian beam models and measurement models for phased array transducers. Ultrasonics. 2009;49:126–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Kim H-J, Song S-J, et al. The far-field scattering response of a side drilled hole in single/layered anisotropic media in ultrasonic pulse-echo setup. Wave Motion. 2011;48:275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Xu C, Xiao D, et al. Nondestructive testing method for curved surfaces based on the multi-gaussian beam model. J Nondestr Eval. 2015;34:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen RR, Habetler TG, Kamran F, et al. Motor bearing damage detection using stator current monitoring. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy. 1995;31:1274–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao YL, Che WB, Zhou K, et al. Design of deployment mechanim of steel ball and Surface defects recognition. Appl Mech Mater. 2013;274: 245–248. Trans Tech Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YW, Ding K, Jia DK, et al. Kinematic analysis of detection of steel ball surface defect based on ADAMS. Adv Mater Res. 2010;102: 83–87. Trans Tech Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H-J, Schmerr LW, Sedov A. Transferring distance-amplitude correction curves using ultrasonic modeling. AIP Conf Proc. 2004;700:753–760.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Sanchez AL, Kim H-J, Schmerr LW, et al. Measurement models and scattering models for predicting the ultrasonic pulse-echo response from side-drilled holes. J Nondestr Eval. 2005;24:83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R, Schmerr LW, Sedov A. Multi-Gaussian ultrasonic beam modeling for multiple curved interfaces—an ABCD matrix approach. Res Nondestr Eval. 2005;16:143–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H-J, Song S-J, Schmerr LW. Modeling ultrasonic pulse-echo signals from a flat-bottom hole in immersion testing using a multi-Gaussian beam. J Nondestr Eval. 2004;23:11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar