3,746
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Additive manufacturing and non-destructive testing of topology-optimised aluminium components

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 315-327 | Received 16 Jan 2020, Accepted 30 Apr 2020, Published online: 15 Jun 2020

References

  • Barroqueiro B, Andrade-Campos A, Valente RAF, et al. Metal additive manufacturing cycle in aerospace industry: A comprehensive review. J Manuf Mater Process. 2019;3:52.
  • Du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I, et al. X-ray microcomputed tomography in additive manufacturing: A review of the current technology and applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2018;5:227–247.
  • De Chiffre L, Carmignato S, Kruth J-P, et al. Industrial applications of computed tomography. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol. [Internet]. 2014;63(2):655–677. [cited 2014 Jul 11]. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007850614001930
  • ECSS. Space product assurance: quality assurance. The Netherlands: ESA Requirements and Standards Division; 2013. pp. 1–67. (ECSS-Q-ST-20C Rev.1).
  • 3D printing in space. 2014.
  • Gebisa AW, Lemu HG. A case study on topology optimized design for additive manufacturing. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2017;276.
  • Saadlaoui Y, Milan J, Rossi J, et al. Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: comparison of conception methods using industrial codes Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: comparison of conception methods using industrial codes. J Manuf Syst. [Internet]. 2017;43:178–186.
  • Van Bael S, Kerckhofs G, Moesen M, et al. Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Mater Sci Eng A. [Internet]. 2011;528:7423–7431.
  • GrabCAD. GE jet engine bracket challenge [Internet]; 2013. [cited 2013 Aug 9]. Available from: https://grabcad.com/challenges/ge-jet-engine-bracket-challenge/
  • Amirkhanov A, Heinzl C, Reiter M, et al. Visual optimality and stability analysis of 3DCT scan positions. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2010;16:1477–1486. DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2010.214
  • Reiter M, Erler M, Kuhn C, et al. SimCT : a simulation tool for X-ray imaging. 2016. pp. 2–8.
  • Reiter M, Weiß D, Gusenbauer C, et al. Evaluation of a histogram-based image quality measure for X-ray computed tomography. iCT Conf. [Internet]. 2014;273–282. Available from: www.3dct.at
  • Lifton JJ, Malcolm AA, JW M. The application of beam hardening correction for industrial X-ray computed tomography. Proceeding of 5th International Symposium NDT Aerospace; 2013 Nov 13–15;  Singapore.
  • Heinzl C, Kastner J, Amirkhamov A, et al. Optimal specimen placement in cone beam X-ray computed tomography. NDT E Int. 2012;50:42–49.
  • Romano S, Brandão A, Gumpinger J, et al. Qualification of AM parts: extreme value statistics applied to tomographic measurements. Mater Des. [Internet]. 2017;131:32–48. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091
  • Andreau O, Pessard E, Koutiri I, et al. A competition between the contour and hatching zones on the high cycle fatigue behaviour of a 316L stainless steel: analyzed using X-ray computed tomography. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;757:146–159.