Effect of patch hybridisation on indentation resistance and residual performance of patch repaired glass/epoxy laminates using acoustic emission monitoring

References

• Diamanti K, Soutis C. Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2010;46(8):342–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar K, Suresh Kumar C, Arumugam V. Damage monitoring of glass/epoxy laminates with different interply fiber orientation using acoustic emission. Struct Health Monit. 2020;147592172093906. (In press). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720939064.
   Google Scholar
• Suresh Kumar C, Arumugam V, Santulli C. Characterization of indentation damage resistance of hybrid composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Compos Part B. 2017;111:165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Jack JK, et al. Experimental investigation on the effect of glass fiber orientation on impact damage resistance under cyclic indentation loading using AE monitoring. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval;2019. (In press). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2019.1684491.
   Google Scholar
• Suvarna R, Arumugam V, Bull DJ, et al. Effect of temperature on low velocity impact damage and post-impact flexural strength of CFRP assessed using ultrasonic C-scan and micro-focus computed tomography. Compos Part B. 2014;66:58–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Dhakal HN, et al. Effect of temperature and hybridisation on the low velocity impact behavior of hemp-basalt/epoxy composites. Compos Struct. 2015;125:407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar K, Kailashbalan P, Arumugam V. Impact response and post-impact performance of unidirectional and crossply carbon/epoxy laminates modified with milled glass fibers. Polym Composites. 2019;40(6):2441–2451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesim A, Bulent Murat I, Mümin K. Thickness effect on repeated impact response of woven fabric composite plates. Compos Part B. 2013;49:80–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caminero MA, Rodríguez GP, Muñoz V. Effect of stacking sequence on Charpy impact and flexural damage behavior of composite laminates. Compos Struct. 2016;136:345–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZY, Richardson MOW. Low velocity impact induced damage evaluation and its effect on the residual flexural properties of pultruded GRP composites. Compos Struct. 2007;81(2):195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okafor AC, Navdeep S, Navrag S, et al. Acoustic emission detection and prediction of fatigue crack propagation in composite patch repairs using neural network. J Thermoplast Composite Mater. 2017;30(1):3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Gunnion AJ. Optimum shapes of scarf repairs. Compos Part A. 2009;40(9):1407–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Gunnion AJ, Orifici AC, et al. Residual strength of composite laminates containing scarfed and straight-sided holes. Compos Part A. 2011;42(12):1951–1961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlopoulou S, Soutis C, Staszewski WJ. Structural health monitoring of composite scarf repairs with guided waves. Key Eng Mater. 2012;518:328–337.
   Google Scholar
• Feras HD, Kunigal NS. Experimental and analytical modeling of scarf repaired composite panels. Mech Adv MaterStruct. 2014;21(3):207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasir B, Xiaoquan C, Hasan JH, et al. Failure mechanisms of scarf-repaired composite laminates under tensile load. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2016;38:2069–2075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djokic D, Johnston A, Rogers A, et al. Residual stress development during the composite patch bonding process: measurement and modeling. Compos Part A. 2002;33(2):277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew JJ, Arumugam V. Effect of patch hybridization on the tensile behavior of patch repaired glass/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;74:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pengcheng C, Xiao-Jing G, Shahram A, et al. Experimental observation of tensile behavior of patch repaired composites. Polym Test. 2014;34:146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachir Bouiadjra B, Oudad W, Albedah A, et al. Effects of the adhesive disband on the performances of bonded composite repairs in aircraft structures. Mater Des. 2012;37:89–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramji M, Srilakshmi R, Bhanu Prakash M. Towards optimization of patch shape on the performance of bonded composite repair using FEM. Compos Part B. 2013;45(1):710–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutis C, Duan DM, Goutas P. Compressive behaviour of CFRP laminates repaired with adhesively bonded external patches. Compos Struct. 1999;45(4):289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Fotouhi M, Saeedifar M, et al. Acoustic emission based investigation on the effect of temperature and hybridization on drop weight impact and post-impact residual strength of hemp and basalt fibres reinforced polymer composite laminates. Compos Part B. 2019;173:106962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh Kumar C, Arumugam V, Sajith S, et al. Acoustic emission characterisation of failure modes in hemp/epoxy and glass/epoxy composite laminates. J Nondestr Eval. 2015;34:31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayababu A, Arumugam V, Rajesh B, et al. Investigation of indentation damage resistance on normal and inclined plane of glass/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. J Compos Mater. 2020;54(21):2953–2964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Jimenez CR, Papadakis N, Reynolds N, et al. Identification of failure modes in glass/polypropylene composites by means of the primary frequency content of the acoustic emission event. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64(12):1819–1827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Saravana Kumar K, Arumugam V. Characterization of failure mechanism in glass, carbon and their hybrid composite laminates in epoxy resin by acoustic emission monitoring. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2019;34(3):254–266.
   Google Scholar
• Pashmforoush F, Fotouhi M, Ahmadi M. Damage characterization of glass/epoxy composite under three-point bending test using acoustic emission technique. J Mater Eng Perform. 2012;21:1380–1390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CS, Arumugam V, Sengottuvelusamy R, et al. Failure strength prediction of glass/epoxy composite laminates from acoustic emission parameters using artificial neural network. Appl Acoust. 2017;115:32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumugam V, Suresh Kumar C, Santulli C, et al. A global method for the identification of failure modes in fiber glass using acoustic emission. J Test Eval. 2011;39(5):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh Kumar C, Pabitha P, Sengottuvelusamy R. Arumugam V and Srinivasan S. Optimization of acoustic emission parameters to discriminate failure modes in glass-epoxy composite laminates using pattern recognition. Struct Health Monit. 2019;18(4):1253–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Fotouhi M, Heidary H, Ahmadi M, et al. Characterization of composite materials damage under quasi-static three-point bending test using wavelet and fuzzy C means clustering. J Compos Mater. 2012;46(15):1795–1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao JR, Gama BA, Gillespie JW. Progressive damage and delamination in plain weave S-2 glass/SC-15 composites under quasi-static punch-shear loading. Compos Struct. 2007;78(2):182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar K, Lakshminarayanan BS, Arumugam V. Effect of thickness and denting behavior of glass/epoxy laminates subjected to quasi-static indentation (QSI) loading under acoustic emission monitoring. J Nondestr Eval. 2018;37:63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw P. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster Analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedifar M, Najafabadi MA, Zarouchas D, et al. Clustering of interlaminar and intralaminar damages in laminated composites under indentation loading using acoustic emission. Compos Part B. 2018;144:206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar