Acoustic emission signal characteristics of maraging steel 250 pressure vessel during a hydraulic qualification test

References

• Marfo A, Chen Z, Li J. Acoustic emission analysis of fatigue crack growth in steel structures. J Civ Eng Constr Technol. 2013;4:239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Akbari M, Ahmadi M. The application of acoustic emission technique to plastic deformation of low carbon steel. Phys Procedia. 2010;3(1):795–801.
   Google Scholar
• Astarita A, Rubino F, Carlone P, et al. On the improvement of AA2024 wear properties through the deposition of a cold-sprayed titanium coating. Metals. 2016;6(8):185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay CK, Rajkumar KV, Jayakumar T, et al. Study of tensile deformation behaviour of M250 grade maraging steel using acoustic emission. J Mater Sci. 2010;45(5):1371–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar J, Ahmad S, Mukhopadhyay CK, et al. Acoustic emission studies for characterization of fatigue crack growth behavior in HSLA steel. Nondestruct Test Eval. 2016;31(1):77–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy H, Bar HN, Sivaprasad S, et al. Acoustic emission during monotonic and cyclic fracture toughness tests of 304LN weldments. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 2010;87(10):543–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruby CB. An introduction to acoustic emission. J Phys E. 1987;20(8):946–953.
   Google Scholar
• Aggelis DG, Brussel VU, Blom J. Fracture monitoring by acoustic emission: recent applications of parameter- based characterization. 9th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures; 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.21012/FC9.237.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang W, Bae S, Kim J, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of stress corrosion cracks in a type 304 stainless steel tube. Nucl Eng Technol. 2015;47(4):454–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayar H, Azadi M, Alizadeh M. Detection of crack initiation and propagation in aluminum alloy under tensile loading, comparing signals acquired by acoustic emission and vibration sensors. J Nondestruct Eval. 2019;38(4):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyasota I, Sarniak L, Kustra P. Acoustic emission analysis of the plastic deformation stages of degraded low-carbon steel after long-term operation in the oil refining and petrochemical processing. Arch Metall Mater. 2019;64:143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyasota I, Kozub B, Gawlik J. Identification of the tensile damage of degraded carbon steel and ferritic alloy-steel by acoustic emission with in situ microscopic investigations. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2019;19(1):274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese L, Bonaccorsi L, Proverbio E, et al. SCC damage evolution on martensitic stainless steel by using acoustic emission technique. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2016;2782:364–371.
   Google Scholar
• Hloch S, Ruggiero A. Online monitoring and analysis of hydroabrasive cutting by vibration. Adv Mech Eng. 2013;Article ID 894561, 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/894561
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh S, Leman Z, Baharudin BTH. A review of the application of acoustic emission technique in engineering. Struct Eng Mech. 2015;54(6):1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos A, Kourousis D, Botten S, et al. Acoustic emission monitoring for detecting structural defects in vessels and offshore structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 2009;4(4):363–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofer M, Kucera P, Krejci L. Acoustic emission and fractographic analysis of seamless steel pressure cylinders with artificial flaws under hydrostatic burst testing. J Nondestruct Eval. 2019;38:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuriti GS, Thomas T, Chattopadhyaya S. Prediction of tensile failure load for maraging steel weldment by acoustic emission technique. Vol. 1. Springer International Publishing; 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99353-9
   Google Scholar
• Habiby H, Ul Haq A, Khan AQ. The properties and applications of 18 % nickel maraging steels. Mater Technol. 2018;9:246–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bai F, Gagar D, Foote P, et al. Comparison of alternative to amplitude thresholding for onset detection of acoustic emission signals. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;84:717–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar