On the use of X-ray microtomography to control artificial defect geometries produced by metal additive manufacturing

References

• Seifi M, Salem A, Beuth J, et al. Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing. Jom. 2016;68:747–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabel T, Oettel M, Mueller B. Design for additive manufacturing - guidelines and case studies for metal applications [Internet]. Dresden: Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU; 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 10]; [p. ilt.1999.01851cab.008]. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/ilt.1999.01851cab.008.
   Google Scholar
• Murakami Y. Material defects as the basis of fatigue design. Int J Fatigue. 2012;41:2–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretta S, Romano S. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes. Int J Fatigue. 2017;94:178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu DD, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev. 2012;57:133–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, et al. Analysis of defect generation in Ti–6Al–4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Additive Manuf. 2014;1–4:87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Tranchand B, Hugues J, Perusin S. Common defects in powder bed fusion technology [Internet]. Toulouse, France: IRT Saint Exupéry; 2019. ( Report No.: LIV-M-031-L10-508). Available from: https://www.irt-saintexupery.com/andduro-project-from-the-demonstration-part-to-the-critical-one/.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafaei A, Zhao C, He Y, et al. Defects and anomalies in powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2022;26:100974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanaei N, Fatemi A, Phan N. Defect characteristics and analysis of their variability in metal L-PBF additive manufacturing. Materials & Design. 2019;182:108091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson HV, Davies S. Fundamental aspects of hot isostatic pressing: an overview. Metall Mater Trans a. 2000;31:2981–3000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin J-R, Kreitcberg A, Brailovski V. Effect of hot isostatic pressing of laser powder bed fused Inconel 625 with purposely induced defects on the residual porosity and fatigue crack propagation behavior. Additive Manuf. 2021;47:102324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessard E, Bellett D, Morel F, et al. A mechanistic approach to the kitagawa–Takahashi diagram using a multiaxial probabilistic framework. Eng Fract Mech. 2013;109:89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin J-R, Kreitcberg A, Terriault P, et al. Fatigue strength prediction of laser powder bed fusion processed Inconel 625 specimens with intentionally-seeded porosity: feasibility study. Int J Fatigue. 2020;132:105394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaify AY, Hughes J, Ridgway K. Critical evaluation of the pulsed selective laser melting process when fabricating Ti64 parts using a range of particle size distributions. Additive Manuf. 2018;19:197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brika SE, Letenneur M, Dion CA, et al. Influence of particle morphology and size distribution on the powder flowability and laser powder bed fusion manufacturability of Ti-6al-4V alloy. Additive Manuf. 2020;31:100929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneric M, Brugger C, Saintier N. Investigation of the sensitivity of the fatigue resistance to defect position in aluminium alloys obtained by selective laser melting using artificial defects. Int J Fatigue. 2020;134:105505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . ISO. ISO 9276-6 - Representation of results of particle size analysis — part 6: descriptive and quantitative representation of particle shape and morphology. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoletto G, Konečná R, Fintova S. Characterization of microshrinkage casting defects of Al–Si alloys by X-ray computed tomography and metallography. Int J Fatigue. 2012;41:39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammon LM, Briggs RD, Packard JM, et al. Metallography and Microstructures of Titanium and Its alloys. In: Vander Voort G, editor. Metallography and Microstructures [Internet]. ASM International. 2004 [cited 2022 Apr 25]; [pp. 899–917]. Available from http://dl.asminternational.org/handbooks/book/38/chapter/488704/Metallography-and-Microstructures-of-Titanium-and.
   Google Scholar
• Voort GV, Manilova E. Metallographic techniques for superalloys. Microsc Microanal. 2004;10:690–691.
   Google Scholar
• Elsner B, Silze F, Marquardt A. Overcoming distortion in new DED additive manufacturing processes with simulation. TCT Magazine [Internet]. 2020 Jun 9 [cited 2022 May 3]. Available from: https://www.tctmagazine.com/api/content/4f65c2ca-a99b-11ea-9cfd-1244d5f7c7c6/.
   Google Scholar
• Martin AA, Calta NP, Khairallah SA, et al. Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1987).
   Google Scholar
• Lhuissier P, Bataillon X, Maestre C, et al. In situ 3D X-ray microtomography of laser-based powder-bed fusion (L-PBF)—A feasibility study. Additive Manuf. 2020;34:101271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell V, Hansson T, Roychowdhury S, et al. Defects in electron beam melted Ti-6al-4V: fatigue life prediction using experimental data and extreme value statistics. Materials. 2021;14:640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammas-Williams S, Zhao H, Léonard F, et al. XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti–6Al–4V components manufactured by selective electron beam melting. Mater Charact. 2015;102:47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persenot T, Buffiere J-Y, Maire E, et al. Fatigue properties of EBM as-built and chemically etched thin parts. Procedia Struct Integr. 2017;7:158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Le V-D, Pessard E, Morel F, et al. Influence of porosity on the fatigue behaviour of additively fabricated TA6V alloys. In: Hénaff G, editor. MATEC Web of Conferences [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 May 17];[p. 02008].Available from: https://www.matec-conferences.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816502008
   Google Scholar
• Le V-D, Pessard E, Morel F, et al. Fatigue behaviour of additively manufactured Ti-6al-4V alloy: the role of defects on scatter and statistical size effect. Int J Fatigue. 2020;140:105811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Murakami T, Mihara R, et al. Defect analysis and fatigue design basis for Ni-based superalloy 718 manufactured by selective laser melting. Int J Fatigue. 2018;117:485–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammas-Williams S, Withers PJ, Todd I, et al. The effectiveness of hot isostatic pressing for closing porosity in titanium parts manufactured by selective electron beam melting. Metall Mater Trans A. 2016;47:1939–1946.
   Google Scholar
• Kaletsch A, Qin S, Herzog S, et al. Influence of high initial porosity introduced by laser powder bed fusion on the fatigue strength of Inconel 718 after post-processing with hot isostatic pressing. Additive Manuf. 2021;47:102331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casadebaigt A, Hugues J, Monceau D. Influence of microstructure and surface roughness on oxidation kinetics at 500–600 °C of Ti–6Al–4V alloy fabricated by additive manufacturing. Oxid Met. 2018;90:633–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar