Evaluation of chemical mutagenicity using next generation sequencing: A review

References

• Martincorena I, Campbell PJ. Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells. Science. 2015;349:1483–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolenko AP, Volkov NM, Preobrazhenskaya EV, et al. Evidence for a pathogenic role of BRCA1 L1705P and W1837X germ-line mutations. Mol Biol Rep. 2016;43:335–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catenacci DV, Amico AL, Nielsen SM, et al. Tumor genome analysis includes germline genome: are we ready for surprises? Int J Cancer. 2015;136:1559–1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allikmets R, Shroyer NF, Singh N, et al. Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 1997;277:1805–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcomb DC, Gorry MC, Preston RA, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis is caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat Genet. 1996;14:141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miquel J. An update on the oxygen stress-mitochondrial mutation theory of aging: genetic and evolutionary implications. Exp Gerontol. 1998;33:113–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes RB, Stringer JR, Shao C, Tischfield JA, Stambrook PJ. Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:3586–3590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach JC, Glusman G, Smit AFA, et al. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science. 2010;328:636–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Kosinska W, Zhao ZL, Wu XR, Guttenplan JB. Tissue-specific mutagenesis by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine as the basis for urothelial carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 2012;742:92–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier B, Cooke SL, Weiss J, et al. C. elegans whole-genome sequencing reveals mutational signatures related to carcinogens and DNA repair deficiency. Genome Res. 2014;24:1624–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1135–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccaroli C, Pulliero A, Geretto M, Izzotti A. Molecular fingerprints of environmental carcinogens in human cancer. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2015;33:188–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai AN, Jere A. Next-generation sequencing: ready for the clinics? Clin Genet. 2012;81:503–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robasky K, Lewis NE, Church GM. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal MA, Glenn TC, Somers CM. Whole genome sequencing for quantifying germline mutation frequency in humans and model species: cautious optimism. Mutat Res. 2012;750:96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CD, Chong JX, Malig M, et al. Estimating the human mutation rate using autozygosity in a founder population. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1277–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keightley PD. Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics. 2012;190:295–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuna M, Amos CI. Genomic sequencing in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013;340:161–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes F, ElSharawy A, Sauer S, et al. Targeted enrichment of genomic DNA regions for next-generation sequencing. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10:374–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamanova L, Coffey AJ, Scott CE, et al. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods. 2010;7:111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masumura K, Toyoda-Hokaiwado N, Ukai A, Gondo Y, Honma M, Nohmi T. Estimation of the frequency of inherited germline mutations by whole exome sequencing in ethyl nitrosourea-treated and untreated gpt delta mice. Genes Environ. 2016;38:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masumura K, Toyoda-Hokaiwado N, Ukai A, Gondo Y, Honma M, Nohmi T. Dose-dependent de novo germline mutations detected by whole-exome sequencing in progeny of ENU-treated male gpt delta mice. Mutat Res. 2016;810:30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meienberg J, Bruggmann R, Oexle K, Matyas G. Clinical sequencing: is WGS the better WES? Hum Genet. 2016;135:359–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawad C, Koh W, Quake SR. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundry M, Li W, Maqbool SB, Vijg J. Direct, genome-wide assessment of DNA mutations in single cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:2032–2040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikriszt B, Poti A, Pipek O, et al. A comprehensive survey of the mutagenic impact of common cancer cytotoxics. Genome Biol. 2016;17:99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt MW, Kennedy SR, Salk JJ, Fox EJ, Hiatt JB, Loeb LA. Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:14508–14513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang ML, Kinde I, Tomasetti C, et al. Genome-wide quantification of rare somatic mutations in normal human tissues using massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:9846–9851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou DI, Hussmann JA, McBee RM, Acevedo A, Andino R, Press WH, Sawyer SL. High-throughput DNA sequencing errors are reduced by orders of magnitude using circle sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:19872–19877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel RK, Jain M. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou DI, Hussmann JA, Mcbee RM, Acevedo A, Andino R, Press WH, Sawyer SL. High-throughput DNA sequencing errors are reduced by orders of magnitude using circle sequencing. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:19872–19877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy SR, Schmitt MW, Fox EJ, et al. Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by Duplex Sequencing. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:2586–2606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratan A, Olson TL, Loughran TP, Jr., Miller W. Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang S, Kim E, Lee I, Marcotte EM. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants. Sci Rep-Uk. 2015;5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish A, Guda C. A comparison of variant calling pipelines using genome in a bottle as a reference. Biomed Res Int. 2015; DOI:10.1155/2015/456479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye K, Schulz MH, Long Q, Apweiler R, Ning Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2865–2871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer A, Phan H, Mathieson I, et al. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat Genet. 2014;46:912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Wang QG, Wang Q, Jia PL, Zhao ZM. Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2013;14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011;43:491–+.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11 10 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Wang K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:1556–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6:80–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paila U, Chapman BA, Kirchner R, Quinlan AR. GEMINI: integrative exploration of genetic variation and genome annotations. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taevernier L, Wynendaele E, De Vreese L, Burvenich C, De Spiegeleer B. The mycotoxin definition reconsidered towards fungal cyclic depsipeptides. J Environ Sci Heal C. 2016;34:114–135.
   Google Scholar
• Smela ME, Currier SS, Bailey EA, Essigmann JM. The chemistry and biology of aflatoxin B(1): from mutational spectrometry to carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:535–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Qin T, Wang K, et al. Integrated microRNA, mRNA, and protein expression profiling reveals microRNA regulatory networks in rat kidney treated with a carcinogenic dose of aristolochic acid. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon SL, Pang ST, McPherson JR, et al. Genome-wide mutational signatures of aristolochic acid and its application as a screening tool. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:197ra101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang ML, Chen CH, Sidorenko VS, et al. Mutational signature of aristolochic acid exposure as revealed by whole-exome sequencing. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:197ra102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T. Genotoxicity of aristolochic acid: A review. J Food Drug Anal. 2007;15:387–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nik-Zainal S, Kucab JE, Morganella S, et al. The genome as a record of environmental exposure. Mutagenesis. 2015;30:763–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane BS, de Boer J, Watson DE, Haseman JK, Glickman BW, Tindall KR. LacI mutation spectra following benzo[a]pyrene treatment of Big Blue mice. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:715–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire MA, Schwartz A, Rahmouni AR, Leng M. Interstrand cross-links are preferentially formed at the d(GC) sites in the reaction between cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:1982–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povirk LF, Shuker D.E. DNA damage and mutagenesis induced by nitrogen mustards. Mutat Res 1994;318:205–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson RD, Veigl ML, Baxter J, Sedwick W.D. Excision repair reduces doxorubicin-induced genotoxicity. Mutat Res 1993;294:215–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nature Biotechnology 2012;30:174–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974;77:71–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics 1977;87:529–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ehling UH, Neuhauser-Klaus A. Induction of specific-locus mutations in male mice by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS). Mutat Res 1989;227:91–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd-Yusoff NF, Ruperao P, Tomoyoshi NE, Edwards D, Gresshoff PM, Biswas B, Batley J. Scanning the effects of ethyl methanesulfonate on the whole genome of Lotus japonicus using second-generation sequencing analysis. G3 (Bethesda) 2015;5:559–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu JS, Johnsen RC, Chua SY, Tu D, Dennison M, Marra M, Jones SJ, Baillie DL, Rose A.M. Allelic ratios and the mutational landscape reveal biologically significant heterozygous SNVs. Genetics 2012;190:1225–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flibotte S, Edgley ML, Chaudhry I, Taylor J, Neil SE, Rogula A, Zapf R, Hirst M, Butterfield Y, Jones SJ, Marra MA, Barstead RJ, Moerman D.G. Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2010;185:431–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarin S, Bertrand V, Bigelow H, Boyanov A, Doitsidou M, Poole RJ, Narula S, Hobert O. Analysis of multiple ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized Caenorhabditis elegans strains by whole-genome sequencing. Genetics 2010;185:417–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen T. Sequencing analysis of mutations induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea at different sampling times in mouse bone marrow. Journal of applied toxicology 2009;30:133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei N, Heflich RH, Moore MM, Chen T. Age-dependent sensitivity of Big Blue transgenic mice to the mutagenicity of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) in liver. Mutat Res-Fund Mol M 2005;572:14–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slikker W, Mei N, Chen T. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) increased brain mutations in prenatal and neonatal mice but not in the adults. Toxicol Sci 2004;81:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Harrington-Brock K, Moore M.M. Mutant frequencies and loss of heterozygosity induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the Thymidine kinase gene of L5178Y/Tk+/−−3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 2002;17:105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Chen T, Harrington-Brock K, Moore M.M. Mutant frequency and mutational spectra in the Tk and Hprt genes of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-treated mouse lymphoma cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 2002;39:296–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovolsky VN, Chen T, Heflich R.H. Molecular analysis of in vivo mutations induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the autosomal Tk and the X-linked Hprt genes of mouse lymphocytes. Environ Mol Mutagen 1999;34:30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer PJ, Leyland-Jones B, Alonso MT, Marsoni S, Wittes R.E. Etoposide (VP-16-213). Current status of an active anticancer drug. N Engl J Med 1985;312:692–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett W, Huang P, Xu YZ, Heinemann V, Grunewald R, Gandhi V. Gemcitabine: metabolism, mechanisms of action, and self-potentiation. Semin Oncol 1995;22:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydemir N, Bilaloglu R. Genotoxicity of two anticancer drugs, gemcitabine and topotecan, in mouse bone marrow in vivo. Mutat Res 2003;537:43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydemir N, Celikler S, Bilaloglu R. In vitro genotoxic effects of the anticancer drug gemcitabine in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 2005;582:35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht JR, Trarbach T, Jaeger E, Hainsworth J, Wolff R, Lloyd K, Bodoky G, Borner M, Laurent D, Jacques C. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in patients (Pts) with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum receiving first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and PTK787/ZK 222584 or placebo (CONFIRM-1). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2s–2s.
   Google Scholar
• Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston P.G. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:330–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott WJ, Ritter EJ, Wilson J.G. DNA synthesis inhibition and cell death associated with hydroxyurea teratogenesis in rat embryos. Dev Biol 1971;26:306–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanft VN, Fruchtman SR, Pickens CV, Rosse WF, Howard TA, Ware R.E. Acquired DNA mutations associated with in vivo hydroxyurea exposure. Blood 2000;95:3589–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozmin SG, Schaaper RM, Shcherbakova PV, Kulikov VN, Noskov VN, Guetsova ML, Alenin VV, Rogozin IB, Makarova KS, Pavlov Y.I. Multiple antimutagenesis mechanisms affect mutagenic activity and specificity of the base analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine in bacteria and yeast. Mutat Res 1998;402:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lada AG, Stepchenkova EI, Waisertreiger IS, Noskov VN, Dhar A, Eudy JD, Boissy RJ, Hirano M, Rogozin IB, Pavlov Y.I. Genome-wide mutation avalanches induced in diploid yeast cells by a base analog or an APOBEC deaminase. PLoS Genet 2013;9:e1003736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SA, Sterling J, Thompson C, Harris S, Mav D, Shah R, Klimczak LJ, Kryukov GV, Malc E, Mieczkowski PA, Resnick MA, Gordenin D.A. Clustered Mutations in Yeast and in Human Cancers Can Arise from Damaged Long Single-Strand DNA Regions. Mol Cell 2012;46:424–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Moore M.M., Screening for chemical mutagens using the mouse lymphoma assay. In Optimization in Drug Discovery: In-vitro Methods; Yan Z, Caldwell G.W. Eds.; Humana Press; Totowa, NJ; 2004, 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Downes DJ, Chonofsky M, Tan KL, Pfannenstiel BT, Reck-Peterson SL, Todd R.B. Characterization of the Mutagenic Spectrum of 4-Nitroquinoline 1-Oxide (4-NQO) in Aspergillus nidulans by Whole Genome Sequencing. G3-Genes Genom Genet 2014;4:2483–2492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickins M, Wright K, Phillips M, Todd N. Toxicity and mutagenicity tests of 4 anti-cancer drugs in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res 1985;143:149–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutscher LM, Shaham S. Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans. WormBook 2014, 1–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soehnge H, Ouhtit A, Ananthaswamy O.N. Mechanisms of induction of skin cancer by UV radiation. Front Biosci 1997;2:d538–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang KL, Ma XL, Zhang X, Wu DF, Sun CY, Sun YZ, Lu XM, Wu CI, Guo CX, Ruan J. Using ultra-sensitive next generation sequencing to dissect DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. Sci Rep-Uk 2016;6.
   Google Scholar
• Adewoye AB, Lindsay SJ, Dubrova YE, Hurles M.E. The genome-wide effects of ionizing radiation on mutation induction in the mammalian germline. Nat Commun 2015;6:6684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Nettleton D, Ying K. Copy number variation detection using next generation sequencing read counts. Bmc Bioinformatics 2014;15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller KE, Marotti JD, de Abreu FB, Peterson JD, Miller TW, Chamberlin MD, Tsongalis GJ, Tafe L.J. Targeted next-generation sequencing detects a high frequency of potentially actionable mutations in metastatic breast cancers. Exp Mol Pathol 2016;100:421–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couraud S, Vaca-Paniagua F, Villar S, Oliver J, Schuster T, Blanche H, Girard N, Tredaniel J, Guilleminault L, Gervais R, Prim N, Vincent M, Margery J, Larive S, Foucher P, Duvert B, Vallee M, Le Calvez-Kelm F, McKay J, Missy P, Morin F, Zalcman G, Olivier M, Souquet PJ, Bio C.I.-i. Noninvasive diagnosis of actionable mutations by deep sequencing of circulating free DNA in lung cancer from never-smokers: a proof-of-concept study from BioCAST/IFCT-1002. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:4613–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleasance ED, Cheetham RK, Stephens PJ, McBride DJ, Humphray SJ, Greenman CD, Varela I, Lin ML, Ordonez GR, Bignell GR, Ye K, Alipaz J, Bauer MJ, Beare D, Butler A, Carter RJ, Chen LN, Cox AJ, Edkins S, Kokko-Gonzales PI, Gormley NA, Grocock RJ, Haudenschild CD, Hims MM, James T, Jia MM, Kingsbury Z, Leroy C, Marshall J, Menzies A, Mudie LJ, Ning ZM, Royce T, Schulz-Trieglaff OB, Spiridou A, Stebbings LA, Szajkowski L, Teague J, Williamson D, Chin L, Ross MT, Campbell PJ, Bentley DR, Futreal PA, Stratton M.R. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 2010;463:191–U73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar