Beyond the Male/female Binary: Gender Equity and Inclusion in Evaluation Surveys

Bibliography

• Ainsworth, Claire. “Sex Redefined.” Nature, 518 (2015): 288–291. doi: 10.1038/518288a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Alliance of Museums. Welcoming Guidelines for Museums. Report. American Alliance of Museums, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Answers to Your Questions about Transgender People, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011. http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Balarajan, Meera, Michelle Gray, and Martin Mitchell. Monitoring Equality: Developing a Gender Identity Question. Report No. 75. National Centre for Social Research. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, Sean, Robbie Singal, Chris Grasso, Dana King, Kenneth Mayer, Kellan Baker, and Harvey Makadon. “Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers.” PLoS One 9, no. 9 (2014). Accessed February 5, 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. Institute of Medicine. The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, Kevin, Maureen A. Callanan, Harriet R. Tenenbaum, and Elizabeth Allen. “Parents Explain more Often to Boys than to Girls During Shared Scientific Thinking.” Psychological Science 12, no. 3 (2001): 258–261. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancstep (née Dancu), Toni, and Lisa Sindorf. Exhibit Designs for Girls’ Engagement: A Guide to the EDGE Design Attributes. Report. San Francisco, CA: Exploratorium, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Sexing the Body. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• “Frequently Asked Questions about Transgender People.” National Center for Transgender Equality. July 11, 2016. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://transequality.org/issues/resources/frequently-asked-questions-about-transgender-people.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, Gary J. How Many People are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender? Report. The Williams Institute, UCLA, School of Law. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• “Gender, Equity and Human Rights: Glossary of Terms and Tools.” WHO. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/knowledge/glossary/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institutes, Institute of Gender and Health. “Definitions of Sex and Gender.” Government of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Gender and Health. June 17, 2015. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/47830.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Jaime M., Lisa A. Mottet, Justin Tanis, Jack Harrison, Jody L. Herman, and Mara Keisling. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Report. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, 2011. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.thetaskforce.org/static_html/downloads/reports/reports/ntds_full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” The Centennial Review 36, no. 3 (1992): 437–470.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Jack, Jaime Grant, and Jody L. Herman. “A Gender not Listed here: Genderqueers, Gender Rebels, and Otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey.” LGBTQ Policy Journal at the Harvard Kennedy School 2 (2012): 13–24. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.thetaskforce.org/gender-listed-genderqueers-gender-rebels-otherwise-national-transgender-discrimination-survey/.
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, Joe. “The Ethics of Evaluation in Museums.” Journal of Museum Education 40, no. 1 (2015): 20–26. doi: 10.1080/10598650.2015.11510829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimlich, Joe, and Judy Koke. “Gay and Lesbian Visitors and Cultural Institutions: Do they Come? Do they Care? A Pilot Study.” Museums & Social Issues 3, no. 1 (2008): 93–104. doi: 10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.93
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. L., ed. Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys. Report. The Williams Institute, UCLA, School of Law. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Jennifer L., Abigail A. Camden, and Tenzin Yangchen. “Rethinking and Updating Demographic Questions: Guidance to Improve Descriptions of Research Samples.” Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research 21, no. 3 (2016): 138–151. doi: 10.24839/2164-8204.JN21.3.138
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. Controlling Bodies, Denying Identities Human Rights Violations Against Trans People in the Netherlands. Report. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• James, Sandy E., Jody L. Herman, Susan Rankin, Mara Keisling, Lisa Mottet, and Ma’ayan Anafi. The Report of the 2015 US Trans Survey. Report. December 2016. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.ustranssurvey.org/.
   Google Scholar
• “LGBTQ Definitions.” Trans Student Educational Resources. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.transstudent.org/definitions.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, Donna, John Fraser, and Joe E. Heimlich. “M or F?: Gender, Identity, and the Transformative Research Paradigm.” Museums and Social Issues 3, no. 1 (2008): 93–105. doi:10.1179/msi.2008.3.1.81.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, Margaret. Family-inclusive Language, 2014. https://incluseum.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/infographic.jpg.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkola, Mari. “Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. December 21, 2017. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/feminism-gender/.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Kristen, and J. Michael Ryan. Design, Development and Testing of the NHIS Sexual Identity Question. Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics, 2011. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/qbank/report/Miller_NCHS_2011_NHIS%20Sexual%20Identity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Girls Collaborative Project. The State of Girls and Women in STEM. 2017. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://ngcproject.org/sites/default/files/ngcp_the_state_of_girls_and_women_in_stem_2017a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, Scott, Sarah Cohn, and Liz Kollmann. Team-based Inquiry: A Practical Guide for Using Evaluation to Improve Informal Education Experiences, Second Edition. Report. 2014. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://nisenet.org.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. Utilization-focused Evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Reisner, Sari L., Kerith J. Conron, Laura Anatale Tardiff, Stephanie Jarvi, Allegra R. Gordon, and S. Bryn Austin. “Monitoring the Health of Transgender and Other Gender Minority Populations: Validity of Natal Sex and Gender Identity Survey Items in a U.S. National Cohort of Young Adults.” BMC Public Health 14, no. 1 (2014). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women.” In Literary Theory: An Anthology, edited by Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan, 2nd ed., 770–794. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Serano, Julia. “Julia Serano’s Trans, Gender, Sexuality, & Activism Glossary.” 2016. Accessed February 5, 2018. http://www.juliaserano.com/terminology.html.
   Google Scholar
• Serano, Julia. Excluded: Making Feminist and Queer Movements more Inclusive. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Serano, Julia. Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, Cara, Lorraine Greaves, and Ian D. Graham. “Why Sex and Gender Matter in Implementation Research.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 16, no. 1 (2016): 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0247-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS), Why We Ask: Sex. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• “Welcome to Research Involving Human Subjects.” National Institutes of Health. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://humansubjects.nih.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook, Laurel, and Aliya Saperstein. “New Categories are not Enough.” Gender & Society 29, no. 4 (2015): 534–560. doi: 10.1177/0891243215584758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, Carole, Todd DeBruin, and McManis & Monsalve Associates. Museum Data Collection Report and Analysis. Report. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services, 2005. Accessed February 5, 2018. https://www.imls.gov/publications/museum-data-collection-report-and-analysis.
   Google Scholar