Accelerating Adoption of New Products of Thai Consumers: The Moderating Roles of Self-Brand Concept and Reference Group

References

• Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64, 601–609. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2, 159–170. doi:10.1007/BF00436035
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 183–194. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 473–481. doi:10.1086/jcr.1989.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 121–134. doi:10.1086/519142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects. European Journal of Marketing, 45, 191–216. doi:10.1108/03090561111095658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Mclver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 143–178. doi:10.1111/jopy.1991.59.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 198–211. doi:10.1086/jcr.1992.19.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, W. J., & Winterich, K. P. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 77, 96–111. doi:10.1509/jm.11.0544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. A., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, 34–43. doi:10.1111/ijc.2006.30.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Cotte, J., & Wood, S. L. (2004). Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 78–86. doi:10.1086/383425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, P. F. (1999). Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 198–211. doi:10.1080/10705519909540128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404–416. doi:10.1037/h0034679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 339–348. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self‐construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389. doi:10.1086/jcr.2005.32.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (1988). Consumer innovativeness: Novelty-seeking, creativity and cognitive style. In E. C. Hirschman & J. N. Sheth (Eds.), Research on consumer behavior (pp. 73–113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gielens, K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 97–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, T. (2008). Convergent products: What functionalities add more value to the base? Journal of Marketing, 72, 46–62. doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., Freiden, J. B., & Eastman, J. K. (1995). The generality/specificity issue in consumer innovativeness research. Technovation, 15, 601–612. doi:10.1016/0166-4972(95)99328-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 209–221. doi:10.1007/BF02726497
   Google Scholar
• Govers, P. C., & Schoormans, J. P. (2005). Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 189–197. doi:10.1108/07363760510605308
   Google Scholar
• Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F. R. (2000). The role of the social-identity function of attitudes in consumer innovativeness and opinion leadership. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 233–252. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31, 22–27. doi:10.2307/1249461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, E. L., & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of self, generalized stereotypes, and brand selection. Journal of Marketing Research, 5, 58–63. doi:10.2307/3149794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon‐Kizer, T. R., Kumar, A., Ortinau, D., & Stock, J. (2013). When multiple identities compete: The role of centrality in self‐brand connections. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 483–495. doi:10.1002/cb.v12.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 283–295. doi:10.1086/jcr.1980.7.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92–101. doi:10.2307/1251707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 141–148. doi:10.1086/jcr.1990.17.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, S., Bayus, B. L., & Mason, C. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 61–73. doi:10.1177/0092070302238602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, S., Mason, C. H., & Houston, M. B. (2007). Does innate consumer innovativeness relate to new product/service adoption behavior? The intervening role of social learning via vicarious innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 63–75. doi:10.1007/s11747-006-0007-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 467–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, N., Yoo, Y., & Heo, T. Y. (2009). Moderating effect of personal innovativeness on mobile-RFID services: Based on Warshaw’s purchase intention model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, B., & Gu Suh, Y. (2005). Integrating effect of consumer perception factors in predicting private brand purchase in a Korean discount store context. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22, 62–71. doi:10.1108/07363760510589226
   Google Scholar
• Kirmani, A. (2009). The self and the brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 271–275. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon, E. L., Jr. (1974). Self concept, ideal self concept, and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37, 117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. (2005). How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 288–294. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, K. C., Bearden, W. O., & Madden, T. J. (1995). Consumer innovativeness and the adoption process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 329–345. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0404_02
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 229–242. doi:10.1086/jcr.1978.4.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowlis, S. M., & Simonson, I. (1996). The effect of new product features on brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 36–46. doi:10.2307/3152011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 250–260. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallister, J. G., Wang, H. C., & Foxall, G. R. (2007). An application of the style/involvement model to financial services. Technovation, 27, 78–88. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50, 135–145. doi:10.2307/1251291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102–110. doi:10.1086/jcr.1977.4.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, R. A. (2004). On assuring valid measures for theoretical models using survey data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125–141. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00297-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. S. (1967). The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation. Journal of Marketing, 31, 14–19. doi:10.2307/1249295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrich, G. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57, 671–677. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00311-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1976). Communication and development: Critical perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serralvo, F. A., Sastre, P. N., & Joao, B. N. (2010). Reference group influence on consumer decision making process: A study in the Brazilian sports utilitarian vehicles segment. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 10, 157–161.
   Google Scholar
• Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562–569. doi:10.1086/221630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sin, L., & Tse, A. (2002). Profiling Internet shoppers in Hong Kong: Demographic, psychographic, attitudinal and experiential factors. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 15, 7–29. doi:10.1300/J046v15n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287–300. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J. B., Hofstede, F. T., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63, 55–69. doi:10.2307/1251945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. A., & Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70, 163–178. doi:10.1016/0022-4359(94)90013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellis, G. J., Yin, E., & Bell, S. (2009). Global consumer innovativeness: Cross-country differences and demographic commonalities. Journal of International Marketing, 17, 1–22. doi:10.1509/jimk.17.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Castaldi, C. (2011). Extending consumer categorization based on innovativeness: Intentions and technology clusters in consumer electronics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1604–1613. doi:10.1002/asi.v62.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandecasteele, B., & Geuens, M. (2010). Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27, 308–318. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan, M. (1966). Experimental study of consumer behavior conformity and independence. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 384–387. doi:10.2307/3149855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, M. P. (1991). The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. Journal of Retailing, 67, 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W. M., & Mo, H. F. (2013). Purchase behavior related to recycled product in China. Review of Business Research, 13, 125–131. doi:10.18374/RBR-13-2.15
   Google Scholar
• Ziamou, P., & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Innovations in product functionality: When and why are explicit comparisons effective? Journal of Marketing, 67, 49–61. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.49.18606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar