Causal Ambiguity in Lean Production Implementation in Malaysia

References

• Achanga, P., Shehab, E., Roy, R., Nelder, G., & Saad, S. (2006). Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17, 460–471. doi:10.1108/17410380610662889
   Google Scholar
• Al-Eisa, A. S., Furayyan, M. A., & Alhemoud, A. M. (2009). An empirical examination of the effects of self-efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention. Management Decision, 47, 1221–1244. doi:10.1108/00251740910984514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy, N. M., & O’connor, C. (1997). Value congruence in leader-member exchange. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 647–662. doi:10.1080/00224549709595486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., & Butcher, D. (2003). Trust in managerial relationships. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 282–304. doi:10.1108/02683940310473064
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, Y., Kishon-Rabin, L., & Tabak, N. (1997). The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structuring on cognitive structuring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1158–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Alexander, J. A. (2010). Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 422–438. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, L. A., & Witt, L. A. (2002). Moderators of the openness to experience-performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 712–721.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. (2011). Benevolent leadership and follower performance: The mediating role of leader–member exchange (LMX). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. K., Moon, H. K. & Nae, E. Y. (2004). Cognition- and affect-based trust and feedback seeking behaviour: The roles of values, cost and goal orientations. Journal of Psychology, 148(5), 603–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coff, R. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–402.
   Google Scholar
• Connel, J., Ferres, N., & Travaglione, T. (2003). Engendering trust in manager‐subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcome. Personnel Review, 32(5), 569–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dora, M., Kumar, M., Van Goubergen, D., Molnar, A., & Gellynck, X. (2013). Operational performance and critical success factors of lean manufacturing in European food processing SMEs. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 31, 156–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2007). Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for repairing integrity and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 893–908.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Alvarez, N., & Nieto-Antolin, M. (2005). Protection and internal transfer of technological competencies: The role of causal ambiguity. Industrial Management and Data System, 105(7), 841–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., & Uhl-bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective relationship-based approach to leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 2(57), 219–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, H. (2013). Microfoundations of management: Behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational actions. The Academy of Management Perspective, 27(2), 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, P., Martinko, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2006). Causal reasoning in dysfunctional leader-member interactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(8), 747–762.
   Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., Halliday, S. V., Gilbert, D., & Murphy, E. (2011). Enhancing performance: Bringing trust, commitment and motivation together in organizations. Journal of General Management, 36(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav, J. R., Mantha, S. S., & Rane, S. B. (2014). Exploring barriers in lean implementation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(2), 122–148.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement & disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: A qualitative case study. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(2), 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. W. (2007). Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 156–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. W., & Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, D. L., & Gill, H. (2011). Antecedents of trust in supervisors, subordinates and peers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4), 313–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-J. (2004). The role of competence-based trust and organizational identification in continuous improvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 623–639.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Mortimer, A. (2008). A continuing lean journey: An electronic manufacturer’s adopting of Kanban. Assembly Automation, 28(2), 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.
   Google Scholar
• Marksberry, P. (2012). Investigating “the way” for Toyota suppliers: A quantitative outlook on Toyota’s replicating effort for supplier development. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 19(2), 277–298.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J., & Schoorman, D. F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayed, F., & Shell, R. L. (2009). Comparison and evaluation of maintenance operations in lean versus non-lean production systems. Journal of Quality in Maintenance, 15(3), 285–296.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, G. B. (1993). Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayitam, S., & Dooley, R. (2007). The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: Moderating effects of cognitive- and affect-based trust in strategic decision making teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1), 42–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003). Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsudin, S., & Othman, R. (2016). Consequences of causal ambiguity on motivation in lean production system adoption: The role of moderating variables. Journal of Advances in Management Studies, 4(1), 82–85.
   Google Scholar
• Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in a strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohal, A., & Egglestone, A. (1994). Lean production: Experience among Australian organizations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(11), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R. T., Soetjipto, B. W., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Do leaders’ influence tactics relate to members’ helping behavior? It depends on the quality of the relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1194–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, K. (2012). Four decades of lean: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taj, S., & Morosan, C. (2011). The impact of lean operating on the Chinese manufacturing performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22(2), 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, P. (1999). Work relations as a precursor to a psychological climate for change: The role of work group supervisors and peers. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodriguez-Sanchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: The role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(3), 377–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Schyns, B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: The role of leader–member exchange, development climate, and change process characteristics. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. A., Baumann, J., & Klemann, C. (2008). Openness to Experience and regulatory focus: Evidence of motivation from fit. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 886–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. S., Bishop, K., & O’Neill, R. (2012). Trust repair: The impact of perceived organizational support and issue-selling. Journal of Management Development, 31(7), 724–737.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Y., & Bellgran, M. (2010). Fundamental mindset that drives improvements toward lean production. Assembly Automation, 30(2), 124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar