A Fuzzy Set Analysis of Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Performance: Insights from East Asia

References

• Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Fedriani, E. M., & Delgado-Márquez, B. L. (2014). Institutional distance among country influences and environmental performance standardization in multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2385–2392. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 221–241. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<221::AID-SMJ948>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J. M., & Morrison, A. J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 729–753. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidlow, A., Ghauri, P. N., Yeniyurt, S., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2015). Establishing rigor in mail-survey procedures in international business research. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2014.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, D., (2011). Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 694–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahms, S. (2015). The effects of institutions and subsidiary competence on the international market orientation in foreign-owned subsidiaries. Management Research Review, 38(12), 1285–1305. doi:10.1108/MRR-06-2014-0142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahms, S. (2017a). Determinants of foreign-owned subsidiary performance in emerging economies. Evidence from Taiwan. Management Research Review, 40(6), 626–647. doi:10.1108/MRR-03-2016-0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahms, S. (2017b). Institutional development and subsidiary decision making autonomy: Theory and evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 9(2), 124–147. doi:10.1504/IJBEM.2017.083358
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Ahmad, A., & Moss, S. (2002). Subsidiary autonomy: The case of multinational subsidiaries in Malaysia. Journal of International Business Studies 33, 183–191. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feurer, S., Baumbach, E., & Woodside, A. G. (2016). Applying configurational theory to build a typology of ethnocentric consumers. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 351–375. doi:10.1108/IMR-03-2014-0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammelgaard, J., McDonald, F., Stephan, A., Tüselmann, H., & Dörrenbächer, C. (2012). The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance. International Business Review, 21(6), 1158–1172. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). London, England: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, U., & Pedersen, T. (2000). The emergence and impact of MNC centres of excellence. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, C., Fürst, A., & Kuehnl, C. (2012). Ensuring international competitiveness: A configurative approach to foreign marketing subsidiaries. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 290–312. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0264-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid‐range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Thomas, J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1278–1313. doi:10.2307/256812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Gray, S.J., (2008). The impact of entry mode choice on foreign affiliate performance: The case of foreign MNEs in South Korea. Management International Review, 48(2), 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostova, T., Marano, V., & Tallman, S. (2016). Headquarters–subsidiary relationships in MNCs: Fifty years of evolving research. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 176–184. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Bao, S. R., & White, G. O., III. (2016). The influence of business ties and national culture on foreign-subsidiary capability building in an emerging market. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 17(4), 318–341. doi:10.1080/10599231.2016.1235957
   Google Scholar
• Legewie, N. (2013). An introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14, 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. doi:10.2307/256809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, L. F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19(1), 90–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Q. T., & Rugman, A. M. (2015). Multinational subsidiary sales and performance in South East Asia. International Business Review, 24(1), 115–123. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: Agents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 525–548. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<525::AID-SMJ104>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordanini, A., & Maglio, P. P. (2009). Market orientation, internal process, and external network: A qualitative comparative analysis of key decisional alternatives in the new service development. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 601–625. doi:10.1111/deci.2009.40.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794–803. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2009). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In C. C. Ragin (Ed.), Redesigning social inquiry: Set relations in social research (pp. 190–212 ). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237–250. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4), 397–411. doi:10.1007/s11575-008-0023-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. P., & Daniels, J. D. (2008). Innovation in international business research: A call for multiple paradigms. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 1081–1090. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Slocum, J. W. (2014). What determines MNC subsidiary performance? Evidence from China. Journal of World Business, 49(3), 421–430. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venaik, S., Midgley, D. F., & Devinney, T. M. (2005). Dual paths to performance: The impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 655–675. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. (2015). An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51, 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P. L., Yeh, S. S., & Woodside, A. G. (2014). Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1647–1670. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar