94
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Farmers Interpretation of Pesticides Pictograms and Their Adherence to Different Ergonomic Principles for Different Sizes

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • United Nations. Sustainable development goals. Decent Work And Economic Growth - United Nations Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/. Published January6, 2023. Accessed July 30, 2021.
  • The World Bank. (2019). World Development Indicators | DataBank. Employment In Agriculture (% Of Total Employment) (Modeled ILO Estimate). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS. Published 2019. Accessed July 30 2021.
  • National Crime Records Bureau. Ministry of home affairs. Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India 2021. National Crime Records Bureau. https://ncrb.gov.in/sites/default/files/ADSI-2021/ADSI_2021_FULL_REPORT.pdf. Published August 08, 2022. Accessed October 10, 2022.
  • Kumari D, Sebastian AJ, John S. Pesticide handling practices and health risks among the apple orchard workers in Western Indian Himalayan region. Hum Ecol Risk Assess: An Int J. 2021;27(1):15–29. doi:10.1080/10807039.2019.1689353.
  • Siswandari Y, Kim W, Xiong S. Comprehension and redesign of recently introduced water-sport prohibitive symbols in South Korea. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;50:196–205. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.09.018.
  • Ben-Bassat T, Shinar D. Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension. Hum Factors. 2006;48(1):182–195. doi:10.1518/001872006776412298.
  • AWY N, Chan AHS Visual and cognitive features on icon effectiveness. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 2008 IAENG International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICINDE 2008), International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2008 (IMECS 2008), 2008, China.
  • Ng AW, Chan AH. What makes an icon effective? In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Hong Kong. American Institute of Physics, 2009;1089 (1):104–114. doi:10.1063/1.3078113.
  • Wogalter MS, Conzola VC, Smith-Jackson TL. Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(3):219–230. doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00009-1.
  • Pedersen P. Legibility of pharmaceutical pictograms: Towards defining a paradigm. Visible Language. August 2019;53(2). 10.34314/vl.v53i2.4646.
  • Bullimore MA, Howarth PA, Fulton J. Assessment of visual performance. In: Wilson J, and Corlett E, eds., Evaluation of Human Work: A Practical Ergonomics Methodology. 2nd ed. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 1995:804–839.
  • Knapp P, Raynor DK, Jebar AH, Price SJ. Interpretation of medication pictograms by adults in the UK. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(7–8):1227–1233. doi:10.1345/aph.1E483.
  • Dowse R. Designing and reporting pictogram research: Problems, pitfalls and lessons learnt. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(6):1208–1215. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.013.
  • Shieh KK, Huang SM. Effects of pictorial size and circle-slash thickness on glance legibility for prohibitive symbols. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33(2):73–83. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2003.09.001.
  • Rousek JB, Hallbeck MS. Improving and analyzing signage within a healthcare setting. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(6):771–784. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2010.12.004.
  • Lindberg T, Näsänen R. The effect of icon spacing and size on the speed of icon processing in the human visual system. Displays. 2003;24(3):111–120. doi:10.1016/S0141-9382(03)00035-0.
  • Chu J, Goldstein M, Anneroth M. Icon size as a function of display screen. In: CHI EA '99: CHI '99 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 1999;314–315. doi:10.1145/632716.632907.
  • Satcharoen K. Icon size effect on selection speed and accuracy. Inte J Comput Theory Eng. 2020;12(6):151–154. doi:10.7763/IJCTE.2020.V12.1281.
  • Wogalter MS, ed., Handbook of Warnings. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006.
  • Muslim Z. Ideographic symbols, meanings in visual communication and design. Int J Arts Humanit. 2018;2:278–290.
  • World Health Organization. Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. international code of conduct on pesticide management. Guidelines on good labelling practice for pesticide (second revision). https://www.fao.org/3/i4854e/i4854e.pdf. Published 2022 Accessed 10 October 2022.
  • Patel G, Mukhopadhyay P. Comprehensibility evaluation and redesign of safety/warning pictograms used on pesticide packaging in central India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess: An Int J. 2022;28(1):22–42. doi:10.1080/10807039.2021.2011130.
  • Shinar D, Dewar R, Summala H, Zakowska L. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: a cross-cultural study. Ergonomics. 2003;46(15):1549–1565. doi:10.1080/0014013032000121615.
  • Folkard S, Monk TH, Bradbury R, Rosenthall J. Time of day effects in school children’s immediate and delayed recall of meaningful material. Br J Psychol. 1977;68(1):45–50. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01557.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.