Is Putin’s popularity real?

References

• Adomanis, Mark. 2014. “Putin’s Poll Numbers Are Skyrocketing, but They Aren’t Going to Last.” Center on Global Interests, April 10. http://www.globalinterests.org/2014/04/10/putins-poll-numbers-are-skyrocketing-but-they-arent-going-to-last/.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, Adam. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226043463.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, and Kosuke Imai. 2011. List: Statistical Methods for the Item Count Technique and List Experiment. Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=list.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, and Kosuke Imai. 2012. “Statistical Analysis of List Experiments.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 47–77.10.1093/pan/mpr048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Graeme, Kosuke Imai, and Jason Lyall. 2014. “Comparing and Combining List and Endorsement Experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 1043–1063.10.1111/ajps.2014.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, Richard. 1991. Assessing Presidential Character: The Media, Elite Opinion and Popular Support. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CNN. 2015. “Vladimir Putin’s Approval Rating? Now at a Whopping 86%.” CNN.Com, February 26. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/02/26/europe/vladimir-putin-popularity/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, Timothy, and Henry Hale. 2009. “The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in a Hybrid Regime.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 473–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, Timothy, and Henry Hale. 2013. Putin’s Uneasy Return: The 2012 Russian Elections Studies Survey. NCEEER Working Paper. Washington, DC: National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.
   Google Scholar
• Corstange, Daniel. 2009. “Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT.” Political Analysis 17 (1): 45–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, Martin. 2009. “Popular Autocrats.” Journal of Democracy 20 (1): 78–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droitcour, J., R. A. Caspar, M. L. Hubbard, T. L. Parsley, W. Visscher, and T. M. Ezzati. 1991. “The Item Count Technique as a Method of Indirect Questioning: A Review of Its Development and a Case Study Application.” In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz and S. Sudman, 185–210. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Allen. 1957. The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, and John Zaller. 1989. “Sources of Popular Support for Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 319–347.10.2307/2111150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, Scott. 2010. “Reflections on Putin and the Media.” Post-Soviet Affairs 26 (1): 77–87.10.2747/1060-586X.26.1.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, Scott, and Alberto Simpser. 2015. “Electoral Manipulation as Bureaucratic Control.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 212–224.10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, Scott, and Konstantin Sonin. 2014. “Government Control of the Media.” Journal of Public Economics 118: 163–171.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, Adam N. 2013. “What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum?: Design and Analysis of the List Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 159–172.10.1093/poq/nfs070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian. 2015. “Vladimir Putin’s Approval Rating at Record Levels.” Guardian, July 23. http://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2015/jul/23/vladimir-putins-approval-rating-at-record-levels.
   Google Scholar
• Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman. 2015. How Modern Dictators Survive: Cooptation, Censorship, Propaganda, and Repression. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Series. No. 10454.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Henry. 2014. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139683524
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, Allyson L., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2010. “Social Desirability Bias in Voter Turnout Reports: Tests Using the Item Count Technique.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (1): 37–67.10.1093/poq/nfp065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, Kosuke. 2011. “Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 106 (494): 407–416.10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Junyan, and Dali Yang. 2015. Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification from a Political Purge in China. Mimeo: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge, Chad P. Kiewiet, and David Nickerson. 2014. “Artificial Inflation or Deflation: Assessing the Item Count Technique in Comparative Surveys.” Political Behavior 36 (3): 659–682.10.1007/s11109-013-9249-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinin, Kirill. 2014. A Study of Social Desirability Bias in the Russian Presidential Elections, 2012. Mimeo: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinin, Kirill. 2015. “Exploring Putin’s Post-crimean Supermajority.” Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J. H., M. D. Cobb, and M. Gilens. 1997. “Racial Attitudes and the ‘New South’.” The Journal of Politics 59 (2): 323–349.10.2307/2998167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 7–48.10.2307/2010422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuran, Timur. 1995. Private Lies, Public Truths. The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmann, Susanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics 47 (1): 42–101.10.2307/2950679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, Jason, Graeme Blair, and Kosuke Imai. 2013. “Explaining Support for Combatants During Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 679–705.10.1017/S0003055413000403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510274
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, John. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” The American Political Science Review 64 (1): 18–34.10.2307/1955610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof, Anton. 1985. “Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: A Review.” European Journal of Social Psychology 15 (3): 263–280.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezavisimaya Gazeta. 2015. “O logichnosti popravok v zakon o FSB [On the Logistics of Amendments to the Law on the FSB].” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, July 7. http://www.ng.ru/editorial/2015-07-07/2_red.html.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1984. The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard. 2007. “Going Public with Private Opinions: Are Post-communist Citizens Afraid to Say What They Think?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 17 (2): 123–142.10.1080/13689880701348837
   Google Scholar
• Simpser, Alberto. 2014. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slon. 2014. “Pochemu ne stoit doveryat’ mnenii grazhdan [Why the opinion of citizens is not to be trusted].” Slon.Ru, August 22. http://slon.ru/russia/pochemu_ne_stoit_doveryat_mneniyu_grazhdan-1146924.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, Valerie. 2014. Sex, Politics and Putin: Political Legitimacy in Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324347.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, Daniel. 2011. “Presidential Popularity in a Hybrid Regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 590–609.10.1111/ajps.2011.55.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, Daniel. 2014. “Putin's Popularity Since 2010: Why Did Support for the Kremlin Plunge, Then Stabilize?” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (5): 370–388.10.1080/1060586X.2014.904541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya, Takahiro, and Yoko Hirai. 2010. “Electorate Item Count Questioning: Why Do People Underreport in Item Count Responses?” Survey Research Methods 4 (3): 139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, Hadley. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174916
   Google Scholar