Destined for deadlock? Russia, Ukraine, and the unfulfilled Minsk agreements

References

• Barkawi, T. 2015. “Diplomacy, War, and World Politics.” In Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, edited by O. J. Sending, V. Pouliot, and I. B. Neumann, 55–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokhina, M. 2014. “Mirnyi Plan Dlya Ukrainy [Peace Plan for Ukraine].” Polit.ru, June 22.
   Google Scholar
• Boulègue, M. 2016. “The Political and Military Implications of the Minsk 2 Agreements.” Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, note no. 11/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Brik, T. 2019. “Ukraine’s ‘Type 4ʹ Conflict: Why Is It Important to Study Terminology before Changing It?” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 575.
   Google Scholar
• Coynash, H. 2019. “Former Donbas Militant Leader Admits ‘Republics’ Exist because of Putin and Russia.” Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, August 19. http://khpg.org/
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J. 2017. “Judy Asks: Can the Minsk Agreement Succeed?” Carnegie Europe, February 22.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. 2019. “Ukraine’s Civil War: Would Accepting This Terminology Help Resolve the Conflict?” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 572.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, D., J. Martin, S. A. Nan, and D. Yagcioglu. 1999. “Dimensions of International Negotiation: A Test of Iklé’s Typology.” Group Decision and Negotiation 8 (2): 89–108. doi:10.1023/A:1008650509008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomza, I. 2019. “Quenching Fire with Gasoline.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 576.
   Google Scholar
• Gutterman, S. 2019. “The Week in Russia. Passport Politics in the Donbas, A Power Play in Vladivostok.” RFE/RL, April 26.
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, F. O., and M. Troitskiy, eds. 2017. Tug of War: Negotiating Security in Eurasia. Waterloo, Canada: CIGI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, H. 2016. “The Minsk Agreements and the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission: Providing Effective Monitoring for the Ceasefire Regime.” Security and Human Rights 27 (3–4): 342–357. doi:10.1163/18750230-02703004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, P. T. 2012. “Issue Content and Incomplete Negotiations.” In Unfinished Business: Why International Negotiations Fail, edited by G. O. Faure, 240–265. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iklé, F. C. 1964. How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2015. “The Ukraine Crisis. Risks of Renewed Military Conflict after Minsk II.” Crisis Group Europe Briefing, no. 73.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2000. “Successful Negotiation in International Violent Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 37 (3): 323–343. doi:10.1177/0022343300037003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., and M. Aggenstam. 2009. “Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution.” In The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, edited by J. Bercovich, V. Kremenyuk, and I. W. Zartman, 33–51. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kaftan, A. 2019. “Pervaya Ustupka. Kak Po Formule Shtaynmaera Poluchit’ Kapitulyatsiyu Ukrainy [The First Concession. How to Obtain the Surrender of Ukraine through the Steinmeier Formula].” Delovaya Stolitsa, October 2.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. 2012. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., and R. Balmforth. 2014. “Poroshenko’s Ukraine Peace Plan Gets Limited Support from Putin.” Reuters, June 22.
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, H. 1956. “Force and Diplomacy in the Nuclear Age.” Foreign Affairs 34 (3): 349–366. doi:10.2307/20031169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudelia, S. 2014. “Domestic Sources of the Donbas Insurgency.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 351.
   Google Scholar
• Malyarenko, T., and S. Wolff. 2019. The Dynamics of Emerging De-Facto States: Eastern Ukraine in the Post-Soviet Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. 2018. “Kyiv Rebrands Its War in the East.” RFE/RL, January 19.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. 2019. “Explainer: What Is the Steinmeier Formula—and Did Zelenskiy Just Capitulate to Moscow?” RFE/RL, October 2.
   Google Scholar
• Min, E. 2018. “Negotiation as an Instrument of War.” Working paper, Los Angeles: University of California, December 4. Accessed June 3, 2019. https://www.ericmin.com/research
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2009. “Cooking the Fudge: Constructive Ambiguity and the Implementation of the Northern Ireland Agreement, 1998–2007.” Irish Political Studies 24 (3): 321–336. doi:10.1080/07907180903075751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, A. 2005 [1953]. Interpretation and Preciseness: A Contribution to the Theory of Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, J. 2013. “Negotiation and Bargaining.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. A. Simmons, 379–400. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the President of the French Republic. 2019. “Paris ‘Normandie’ Summit—Common Agreed Conclusions.” December 9. https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2019/12/09/paris-normandie-summit.en
   Google Scholar
• Office of the President of Ukraine. 2019. “The Parties Will Return to the Issue of Restoring Ukraine’s Full Control over the State Border during the Next Meeting in the Normandy Format—President.” December 20. https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/do-pitannya-vidnovlennya-ukrayinoyu-povnogo-kontrolyu-nad-de-58813
   Google Scholar
• OSCE SMM (OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine). 2019. “2018 Trends and Observations.” March 27. https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/415382
   Google Scholar
• Pifer, S. 2015. “Russian Aggression against Ukraine and the West’s Policy Response.” Statement Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, March 4.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, L. 1966. “A Suggested Model of International Negotiation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 10 (3): 344–353. doi:10.1177/002200276601000306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schecter, J. L. 1998. Russian Negotiating Behavior: Continuity and Transition. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schonewille, M. A. 2009. Toolkit Generating Outcomes. Making & Saving Deals: Mediation – Negotiation. The Hauge: Sdu.
   Google Scholar
• Sebenius, J. K., and M. K. Singh. 2012. “Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible? An Analytical Framework for the Iran Nuclear Negotiations?” International Security 37 (3): 52–91. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socor, V. 2019. “Russia Launches ‘Passportization’ in Occupied Donbas.” Eurasia Daily Monitor, May 1 (Part One) and May 2 (Part Two).
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. 2014. “Ukraine Crisis: Details of Poroshenko’s Peace Plan Emerge.” BBC News, June 20.
   Google Scholar
• Sushko, O. 2017. “Is There a Way Out of the Minsk Agreement Deadlock?” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 474.
   Google Scholar
• Sutyagin, I. 2015. “Russian Forces in Ukraine.” RUSI Briefing Paper, March 2015. https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/201503_bp_russian_forces_in_ukraine.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trilateral Contact Group. 2014. “Protocol on the Outcome of Consultations of the Trilateral Contact Group on Joint Steps Aimed at the Implementation of the Peace Plan of the President of Ukraine, P. Poroshenko, and the Initiatives of the President of the Russian Federation, V. Putin.” September 5. https://www.osce.org/ru/home/123258
   Google Scholar
• Trilateral Contact Group. 2015. “Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements.” February 12. https://peacemaker.un.org/ukraine-minsk-implementation15
   Google Scholar
• Troitskiy, M. 2019. “When Is ‘Enough’ Enough? Uncertainty.” In How Negotiations End: Negotiating Behavior in the Endgame, edited by I. W. Zartman, 238–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsyganok, A. 2017. Donbass: Nezakonchennaya Voyna. Grazhdanskaya Voyna Na Ukraine (2014–2016): Russkiy Vzglyad [Donbass: The Unfinished War. Civil War in Ukraine (2014–2016): A Russian View]. Moscow: AIRO-XXI.
   Google Scholar
• UCDP/PRIO. 2017. “UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, Version 17.1.” https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/ucdpprio/ucdp-prio-acd-171.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Security Council. 2015. “Resolution 2202 (2015).” February 17. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/
   Google Scholar
• US Mission (US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva). 2014. “Text of the Geneva Statement on Ukraine Released by the US, EU, Ukraine and Russia.” April 17.
   Google Scholar
• Wanis-St. John, A., and C. Dupont. 2012. “Structural Dimensions of Failure in Negotiation.” In Unfinished Business: Why International Negotiations Fail, edited by G. O. Faure, 203–219. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesolowsky, T., and Y. Polyanska. 2018. “Five Issues with Ukraine’s ‘Occupied Territories’ Bill.” RFE/RL, January 18.
   Google Scholar
• Wittke, C. 2019. “The Minsk Agreements—More than ‘Scraps of Paper’?” East European Politics 35 (3): 264–290. doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1635885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadyraka, K. 2016. “Mins’ki Ugody: Istoriya, Interesy, Perspektivy [The Minsk Agreements: History, Interests, Perspectives].” Spil’ne, November 2. https://commons.com.ua/uk/minski-ugodi-istoriya-interesi-perspektivi/
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I. W. 2000. “Ripeness: The Hurting Stalemate and Beyond.” In International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War, edited by P. C. Stern and D. Druckman, 225–250. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I. W., ed. 2019a. How Negotiations End: Negotiating Behavior in the Endgame. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I. W. 2019b. “Introduction.” In How Negotiations End: Negotiating Behavior in the Endgame, edited by I. W. Zartman, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhuchkovsky, A. G. 2018. 85 Dnei Slavyanska [85 Days of Slavyansk]. Moscow: Chernaya sotnya.
   Google Scholar