Block copolymer micelles as delivery vehicles of hydrophobic drugs: Micelle–cell interactions

References

• Adams ML, Lavasanifar A, Kwon GS. Amphiphilic block copolymers for drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 2003, 92: 1343–1355
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alakhov VY, Kabanov AV. Block copolymeric biotransport carriers as versatile vehicles for drug delivery. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 1998, 7: 1453–1473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aliabadi HM, Mahmud A, Sharifabadi AD, Lavasanifar A. Micelles of methoxy poly(ethylene oxide)–b–poly(epsiloncaprolactone) as vehicles for the solubilization and controlled delivery of cyclosporine A. J Control Release 2005, 104: 301–311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen C. 1999. Polycaprolactone–b–poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer micelles: Physico-chemical characterization and application in drug delivery, McGill University. Doctoral dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: Entering the mainstream. Science 2004, 303: 1818–1822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen C, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A. Nano-engineering block copolymer aggregates for drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1999a, 16: 3–27
   Google Scholar
• Allen C, Yu Y, Eisenberg A, Maysinger D. Cellular internalization of PCL(20)–b–PEO(44) block copolymer micelles. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999b, 1421: 32–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen C, Eisenberg A, Mrsic J, Maysinger D. PCL–b–PEO micelles as a delivery vehicle for FK506: Assessment of a functional recovery of crushed peripheral nerve. Drug Deliv 2000a, 7: 139–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen C, Han J, Yu Y, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A. Polycaprolactone–b–poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer micelles as a delivery vehicle for dihydrotestosterone. J Control Release 2000b, 63: 275–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amerongen GPV, van Hinsbergh VWM. Targets for pharmacological intervention of endothelial hyperpermeability and barrier function. Vascul Pharmacol 2002, 39: 257–272
   Google Scholar
• Araujo L, Lobenberg R, Kreuter J. Influence of the surfactant concentration on the body distribution of nanoparticles. J Drug Target 1999, 6: 373–385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arima H, Yunomae K, Miyake K, Irie T, Hirayama F, Uekama K. Comparative studies of the enhancing effects of cyclodextrins on the solubility and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats. J Pharm Sci 2001, 90: 690–701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batrakova EV, Li S, Vinogradov SV, Alakhov VY, Miller DW, Kabanov AV. Mechanism of Pluronic® effect on P-glycoprotein efflux system in blood–brain barrier: Contributions of energy depletion and membrane fluidization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001, 299: 483–493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batrakova EV, Li S, Li Y, Alakhov VY, Elmquist WF, Kabanov AV. Distribution kinetics of a micelle-forming block copolymer Pluronic® P85. J Control Release 2004, 100: 389–397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogunia-Kubik K, Sugisaka M. From molecular biology to nanotechnology and nanomedicine. Biosystems 2002, 65: 123–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonomi P. Eastern cooperative oncology group experience with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 1998, 113: 13S–16S
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro G, Maniscalco L, Licciardi M, Giammona G. Tamoxifen-loaded polymeric micelles: Preparation, physicochemical characterization and in vitro evaluation studies. Macromol Biosci 2004, 4: 1028–1038
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang SF, Chang HY, Tong YC, Chen SH, Hsaio FC, Lu SC, Liaw J. Nonionic polymeric micelles for oral gene delivery in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2004, 15: 481–493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalhaimer P, Engler AJ, Parthasarathy R, Discher DE. Targeted worm micelles. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5: 1714–1719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danson S, Ferry D, Alakhov V, Margison J, Kerr D, Jowle D, Brampton M, Halbert G, Ranson M. Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of Pluronic® polymerbound doxorubicin (SP 1049C) in patients with advanced cancer. Br J Cancer 2004, 90: 2085–2091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De S, Miller DW, Robinson DH. Effect of particle size of nanospheres and microspheres on the cellular-association and cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in 4T1 cells. Pharm Res 2005, 22: 766–775
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demina T, Grozdova I, Krylova O, Zhirnov A, Istratov V, Frey H, Kautz H, Melik-Nubarov N. Relationship between the structure of amphiphilic copolymers and their ability to disturb lipid bilayers. Biochemistry 2005, 44: 4042–4054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrov P, Rangelov S, Dworak A, Tsvetanov CB. Synthesis and associating properties of poly(ethoxyethyl glycidyl ether)/poly(propylene oxide) triblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2004, 37: 1000–1008
   Google Scholar
• Drexler KE. Molecular engineering—an approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Phys Sci 1981, 78: 5275–5278
   Google Scholar
• Drexler KE. Nanotechnology: From feynman to funding. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2004, 24: 21–27
   Google Scholar
• Dubertret B, Skourides P, Norris DJ, Noireaux V, Brivanlou AH, Libchaber A. In vivo imaging of quantum dots encapsulated in phospholipid micelles. Science 2002, 298: 1759–1762
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan R. The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003, 2: 347–360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan R, Pratten MK, Cable HC, Ringsdorf H, Lloyd JB. Effect of molecular-size of I-125-labeled poly(vinylpyrrolidone) on its pinocytosis by rat visceral yolk sacs and rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochem J 1981, 196: 49–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emptage NJ. Fluorescent imaging in living systems. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2001, 1: 521–525
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feynman RP. 1960. There's plenty of room at the bottom: An invitation to enter a new field of physics. Engineering and Science, California Institute of Technology, (Transcript of a talk given at CALTECH Dec 29, 1959)
   Google Scholar
• Freitas RA. Exploratory design in medical nanotechnology: A mechanical artificial red cell. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 1998, 26: 411–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freitas RA. Nanomedicine, volume I: Basic capabilities. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX 1999
   Google Scholar
• Funhoff AM, Monge S, Teeuwen R, Koning GA, Schuurmans-Nieuwenbroek NM, Crommelin DJ, Haddleton DM, Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF. PEG shielded polymeric double layered micelles for gene delivery. J Control Release 2005, 102: 711–724
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabizon A, Catane R, Uziely B, Kaufman B, Safra T, Cohen R, Martin F, Huang A, Barenholz Y. Prolonged circulation time and enhanced accumulation in malignant exudates of doxorubicin encapsulated in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes. Cancer Res 1994, 54: 987–992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaucher G, Dufresne MH, Sant VP, Kang N, Maysinger D, Leroux JC. Block copolymer micelles: Preparation, characterization and application in drug delivery. J Control Release 2005, 109: 169–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gil ES, Hudson SA. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their bioconjugates. Prog Polym Sci 2004, 29: 1173–1222
   Google Scholar
• Gillies ER, Frechet JMJ. Development of acid-sensitive copolymer micelles for drug delivery. Pure Appl Chem 2004, 76: 1295–1307
   Google Scholar
• Gillies ER, Frechet JM. pH-Responsive copolymer assemblies for controlled release of doxorubicin. Bioconjug Chem 2005, 16: 361–368
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillies ER, Jonsson TB, Frechet JMJ. Stimuli-responsive supramolecular assemblies of linear-dendritic copolymers. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126: 11936–11943
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gros L, Ringsdorf H, Schupp H. Polymeric anti-tumor agents on a molecular and on a cellular-level. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1981, 20: 305–325
   Google Scholar
• Harada A, Togawa H, Kataoka K. Physicochemical properties and nuclease resistance of antisense-oligodeoxynucleotides entrapped in the core of polyion complex micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(l-lysine) block copolymers. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001, 13: 35–42
   Google Scholar
• Hirano T, Klesse W, Ringsdorf H. Polymeric derivatives of activated cyclophosphamide as drug delivery systems in antitumor chemotherapy—pharmacologically active polymers 0.20. Makromol Chem Macromol Chem Phys 1979, 180: 1125–1131
   Google Scholar
• Jewell RC, Khor SP, Kisor DF, LaCroix KA, Wargin WA. Pharmacokinetics of RheothRx injection in healthy male volunteers. J Pharm Sci 1997, 86: 808–812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic® block copolymers in drug delivery: From micellar nanocontainers to biological response modifiers. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2002, 19: 1–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Okano T. Challenges in polymer therapeutics: State of the art and prospects of polymer drugs. Adv Exp Med Biol 2003, 519: 1–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Slepnev VI, Kuznetsova LE, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY, Meliknubarov NS, Sveshnikov PG, Kabanov VA. Pluronic® micelles as a tool for low-molecular compound vector delivery into a cell—effect of staphylococcus-aureus enterotoxin-B on cell loading with micelle incorporated fluorescent dye. Biochem Int 1992, 26: 1035–1042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic® block copolymers for overcoming drug resistance in cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002a, 54: 759–779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic® block copolymers for overcoming drug resistance in cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002b, 54: 759–779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Batrakova EV, Sriadibhatla S, Yang Z, Kelly DL, Alakov VY. Polymer genomics: Shifting the gene and drug delivery paradigms. J Control Release 2005, 101: 259–271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kakizawa Y, Kataoka K. Block copolymer micelles for delivery of gene and related compounds. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002, 54: 203–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang YJ, Taton TA. Core/shell gold nanoparticles by self-assembly and cross-linking of micellar, block-copolymer shells. Angew Chem Int Ed 2005, 44: 409–412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang N, Perron ME, Prud'homme RE, Zhang YB, Gaucher G, Leroux JC. Stereocomplex block copolymer micelles: Core-shell nanostructures with enhanced stability. Nanoletters 2005, 5: 315–319
   Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 47: 113–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katayama Y, Sonoda T, Maeda M. A polymer micelle responding to the protein kinase A signal. Macromolecules 2001, 34: 8569–8573
   Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Kim DW, Chung JY, Shin SG, Kim SC, Heo DS, Kim NK, Bang YJ. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Genexol-PM, a cremophor-free, polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10: 3708–3716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krylova OO, Pohl P. Ionophoric activity of Pluronic® block copolymers. Biochemistry 2004, 43: 3696–3703
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar N, Ravikumar MNV, Domb AJ. Biodegradable block copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 53: 23–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon GS. Polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly water soluble compounds. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2003, 20: 357–403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon G, Naito M, Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y, Kataoka K. Micelles based on Ab block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(beta-benzyl l-aspartate). Langmuir 1993, 9: 945–949
   Google Scholar
• Kwon GS, Naito M, Kataoka K, Yokoyama M, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Block copolymer micelles as vehicles for hydrophobic drugs. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1994a, 2: 429–434
   Google Scholar
• Kwon GS, Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y, Kataoka K. Enhanced tumor accumulation and prolonged circulation times of micelle-forming poly(ethylene oxide-aspartate) block copolymer–adriamycin conjugates. J Control Release 1994b, 28: 334–335
   Google Scholar
• La SB, Okano T, Kataoka K. Preparation and characterization of the micelle-forming polymeric drug indomethacin incorporated poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(beta-benzyl l-aspartate) block copolymer micelles. J Pharm Sci 1996, 85: 85–90
   Google Scholar
• Lavan DA, Lynn DM, Langer R. Moving smaller in drug discovery and delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002, 1: 77–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehn JM. Supramolecular chemistry. Science 1993, 260: 1762–1763
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lele BS, Leroux JC. Synthesis and micellar characterization of novel Amphiphilic A–B–A triblock copolymers of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide or N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone with poly(is an element of-caprolactone). Macromolecules 2002, 35: 6714–6723
   Google Scholar
• Letchford K, Zastre J, Liggins R, Burt H. Synthesis and micellar characterization of short block length methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)–block–poly(caprolactone) diblock copolymers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004, 35: 81–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li YW, Duc HLH, Tyler B, Williams T, Tupper M, Langer R, Brem H, Cima MJ. In vivo delivery of BCNU from a MEMS device to a tumor model. J Control Release 2005, 106: 138–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liaw J, Aoyagi T, Kataoka K, Sakurai Y, Okano T. Permeation of PEO-PBLA-FITC polymeric micelles in aortic endothelial cells. Pharm Res 1999, 16: 213–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu SQ, Tong YW, Yang YY. Incorporation and in vitro release of doxorubicin in thermally sensitive micelles made from poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N,N-dimethylacrylamide)–b–poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) with varying compositions. Biomaterials 2005, 26: 5064–5074
   Google Scholar
• Luo LB, Tam J, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A. Cellular internalization of poly(ethylene oxide)–b–poly(epsilon-caprolactone) diblock copolymer micelles. Bioconjug Chem 2002, 13: 1259–1265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: A review. J Control Release 2000, 65: 271–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahmud A, Lavasanifar A. The effect of block copolymer structure on the internalization of polymeric micelles by human breast cancer cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005, 45: 82–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Hamaguchi T, Ura T, Muro K, Yamada Y, Shimada Y, Shirao K, Okusaka T, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Watanabe N. Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetic evaluation of NK911, a micelle-encapsulated doxorubicin. Br J Cancer 2004, 91: 1775–1781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melik-Nubarov NS, Pomaz OO, Dorodnych TY, Badun GA, Ksenofontov AL, Schemchukova OB, Arzhakov SA. Interaction of tumor and normal blood cells with ethylene oxide and propylene oxide block copolymers. FEBS Lett 1999, 446: 194–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mellman I. Endocytosis and molecular sorting. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1996, 12: 575–625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menger FM. Structure of micelles. Acc Chem Res 1979, 12: 111–114
   Google Scholar
• Menger FM, Jerkunica JM, Johnston JC. Water-content of a micelle interior—Fjord vs. Reef models. J Am Chem Soc 1978, 100: 4676–4678
   Google Scholar
• Minko T, Batrakova EV, Li S, Li YL, Pakunlu RI, Alakhov VY, Kabanov AV. Pluronic® block copolymers alter apoptotic signal transduction of doxorubicin in drug-resistant cancer cells. J Control Release 2005, 105: 269–278
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyake K, Hirayama F, Uekama K. Solubility and mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic studies on interaction of cyclosporin A with dimethyl-alpha- and -beta-cyclodextrins in aqueous solution. J Pharm Sci 1999, 88: 39–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukerjee P. Micellar properties of drugs—micellar and non-micellar patterns of self-association of hydrophobic solutes of different molecular-structures—monomer fraction, availability, and misuses of micellar hypothesis. J Pharm Sci 1974, 63: 972–981
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulhaupt R. Hermann Staudinger and the origin of macromolecular chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 2004, 43: 1054–1063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasongkla N, Shuai X, Ai H, Weinberg BD, Pink J, Boothman DA, Gao JM. cRGD-functionalized polymer micelles for targeted doxorubicin delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed 2004, 43: 6323–6327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noguchi Y, Wu J, Duncan R, Strohalm J, Ulbrich K, Akaike T, Maeda H. Early phase tumor accumulation of macromolecules: A great difference in clearance rate between tumor and normal tissues. Jpn J Cancer Res 1998, 89: 307–314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panyam J, Sahoo SK, Prabha S, Bargar T, Labhasetwar V. Fluorescence and electron microscopy probes for cellular and tissue uptake of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2003, 262: 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Park YJ, Lee JY, Chang YS, Jeong JM, Chung JK, Lee MC, Park KB, Lee SJ. Radioisotope carrying polyethyleneoxide polycaprolactone copolymer micelles for targetable bone imaging. Biomaterials 2002, 23: 873–879
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrov P, Bozukov M, Tsvetanov CB. Innovative approach for stabilizing poly(ethylene oxide)–b–poly(propylene oxide)–b–poly(ethylene oxide) micelles by forming nano-sized networks in the micelle. J Mater Chem 2005, 15: 1481–1486
   Google Scholar
• Prabha S, Zhou WZ, Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Size dependency of nanoparticle-mediated gene transfection: Studies with fractionated nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2002, 244: 105–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pratten MK, Cable HC, Ringsdorf H, Lloyd JB. Adsorptive pinocytosis of polycationic co-polymers of vinylpyrrolidone with vinylamine by rat yolk-sac and rat peritoneal macrophage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982, 719: 424–430
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pratten MK, Lloyd JB, Horpel G, Ringsdorf H. Micelle-forming block copolymers—pinocytosis by macrophages and interaction with model membranes. Makromol Chem Macromol Chem Phys 1985, 186: 725–733
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Marin AP, Timoshin AA. Effect of a polymeric surfactant on electron transport in HL-60 cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000, 384: 100–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapoport N, Marin A, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Muniruzzaman M. Intracellular uptake and trafficking of Pluronic® micelles in drug-sensitive and MDR cells: Effect on the intracellular drug localization. J Pharm Sci 2002, 91: 157–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D. Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin-and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J 2004, 377: 159–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riess G. Micellization of block copolymers. Prog Polym Sci 2003, 28: 1107–1170
   Google Scholar
• Ringsdorf H. Polymer drugs on a molecular-level and cellular level. Am Chem Soc 1980, 180, 46-ORPL
   Google Scholar
• Ringsdorf H. Hermann Staudinger and the future of polymer research: Jubilees—beloved occasions for cultural piety. Angew Chem Int Ed 2004, 43: 1064–1076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringsdorf H. (Special issue in honour of Dr Helmut Ringsdorf) Lifetime Achievement Award. J Drug Target 2006; 14(7)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ringsdorf H, Schlarb B, Venzmer J. Molecular architecture and function of polymeric oriented systems—models for the study of organization, surface recognition, and dynamics of biomembranes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1988, 27: 113–158
   Google Scholar
• Rosler A, Vandermeulen GWM, Klok HA. Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 53: 95–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakai T, Alexandridis P. Single-step synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles in aqueous Pluronic® block copolymer solutions at ambient temperature. Langmuir 2004, 20: 8426–8430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savić R, Luo LB, Eisenberg A, Maysinger D. Micellar nanocontainers distribute to defined cytoplasmic organelles. Science 2003, 300: 615–618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savić R, Azzam T, Eisenberg A, Maysinger D. Assessment of the integrity of poly(caprolactone)–b–poly(ethylene oxide) micelles under biological conditions: A fluorogenic-based approach. Langmuir 2006a, 22: 3570–3578
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savić R, Azzam T, Eisenberg A, Maysinger D. Langmuir. Am Chem Soc 2006b, http://pubs3.acs.org/acs /journals/doilookup?in_doi = 10.1021/la0531998, Table of Contents Graphic, Copyright 2006
   Google Scholar
• Schreier S, Malheiros SVP, de Paula E. Surface active drugs: Self-association and interaction with membranes and surfactants. Physicochemical and biological aspects. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 2000, 1508: 210–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuai XT, Ai H, Nasongkla N, Kim S, Gao JM. Micellar carriers based on block copolymers of poly(e-caprolactone) and poly(ethylene glycol) for doxorubicin delivery. J Control Release 2004a, 98: 415–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuai XT, Merdan T, Schaper AK, Xi F, Kissel T. Core cross-linked polymeric micelles as paclitaxel carriers. Bioconjug Chem 2004b, 15: 441–448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidorov SN, Bronstein LM, Kabachii YA, Valetsky PM, Soo PL, Maysinger D, Eisenberg A. Influence of metalation on the morphologies of poly(ethylene oxide)–block–poly(4-vinylpyridine) block copolymer micelles. Langmuir 2004, 20: 3543–3550
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigma Aldrich Inc. 2003. Datasheet A8380.
   Google Scholar
• Small DM. The bile acids: Chemistry, physiology and metabolism, PP Nair, D Kritchevsky. Plenum Press, New York 1971; 249–356
   Google Scholar
• Steele JC, Jr., Tanford C, Reynolds JA. Determination of partial specific volumes for lipid-associated proteins. Methods Enzymol 1978, 48: 11–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taillefer J, Brasseur N, van Lier JE, Lenaerts V, Le Garrec D, Leroux JC. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of pH-responsive polymeric micelles in a photodynamic cancer therapy model. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001, 53: 155–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Y, Liu SY, Armes SP, Billingham NC. Solubilization and controlled release of a hydrophobic drug using novel micelle-forming ABC triblock copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4: 1636–1645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torchilin VP. Structure and design of polymeric surfactant based drug delivery systems. J Control Release 2001, 73: 137–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torchilin VP, Lukyanov AN, Gao ZG, Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg B. Immunomicelles: Targeted pharmaceutical carriers for poorly soluble drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100: 6039–6044
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twaites B, Alarcon CD, Alexander C. Synthetic polymers as drugs and therapeutics. J Mater Chem 2005, 15: 441–455
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakaki M, Papoutsakis L, Katsamanis V, Afchoudia T, Fragouli PG, Iatrou H, Hadjichristidis N, Armes SP, Sidorov S, Zhirov D, Zhirov V, Kostylev M, Bronstein LM, Anastasiadis SH. Anastasiadis SH. 2005. Micellization in pH-sensitive amphiphilic block copolymers in aqueous media and the formation of metal nanoparticles. Faraday Discuss 2005, 128: 129–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Stam J, Creutz S, De Schryver FC, Jerome R. Tuning of the exchange dynamics of unimers between block copolymer micelles with temperature, cosolvents, and cosurfactants. Macromolecules 2000, 33: 6388–6395
   Google Scholar
• Venne A, Li SM, Mandeville R, Kabanov A, Alakhov V. Hypersensitizing effect of Pluronic® L61 on cytotoxic activity, transport, and subcellular distribution of doxorubicin in multiple drug-resistant cells. Cancer Res 1996, 56: 3626–3629
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallrabe H, Periasamy A. Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005, 16: 19–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitesides GM, Grzybowski B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 2002, 295: 2418–2421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu PS, Tang HD, Li SY, Ren J, Van Kirk E, Murdoch WJ, Radosz M, Shen YQ. Enhanced stability of core-surface cross-linked micelles fabricated from amphiphilic brush copolymers. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5: 1736–1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Yasugi K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y, Kataoka K. Temperature-related change in the properties relevant to drug delivery of poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(d,l-lactide) block copolymer micelles in aqueous milieu. J Control Release 2002, 82: 359–371
   Google Scholar
• Yoo HS, Park TG. Biodegradable polymeric micelles composed of doxorubicin conjugated PLGA–PEG block copolymer. J Control Release 2001, 70: 63–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo HS, Park TG. Folate receptor targeted biodegradable polymeric doxorubicin micelles. J Control Release 2004, 96: 273–283
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo HS, Lee EA, Park TG. Doxorubicin-conjugated biodegradable polymeric micelles having acid-cleavable linkages. J Control Release 2002, 82: 17–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zastre J, Jackson J, Bajwa M, Liggins R, Iqbal F, Burt H. Enhanced cellular accumulation of a P-glycoprotein substrate, rhodamine-123, by Caco-2 cells using low molecular weight methoxypolyethylene glycol–block–polycaprolactone diblock copolymers. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2002, 54: 299–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zastre J, Jackson J, Burt H. Evidence for modulation of P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux by methoxypolyethylene glycol–block–polycaprolactone amphiphilic diblock copolymers. Pharm Res 2004, 21: 1489–1497
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zauner W, Farrow NA, Haines AMR. In vitro uptake of polystyrene microspheres: Effect of particle size, cell line and cell density. J Control Release 2001, 71: 39–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng FQ, Liu JB, Allen C. Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol)–block–poly(5-benzyloxytrimethylene carbonate) copolymers for drug delivery. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5: 1810–1817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang LF, Eisenberg A. Multiple morphologies of crew-cut aggregates of polystyrene–b–poly(acrylic acid) block-copolymers. Science 1995, 268: 1728–1731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang LF, Yu K, Eisenberg A. Ion-induced morphological changes in “crew-cut” aggregates of amphiphilic block copolymers. Science 1996, 272: 1777–1779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar