Recent advances in ultrasound-triggered therapy

References

• Wu S, Li L, Wang G, et al. Ultrasound-targeted stromal cell-derived factor-1-loaded microbubble destruction promotes mesenchymal stem cell homing to kidneys in diabetic nephropathy rats. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:5639–5651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao D, Xu M, Cao Z, et al. Ultrasound-triggered phase-transition cationic nanodroplets for enhanced gene delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:13524–13537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JK, Pham B, Zong Y, et al. Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain. J Control Release. 2016;231:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devarakonda SB, Myers MR, Lanier M, et al. Assessment of gold nanoparticle-mediated-enhanced hyperthermia using MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation procedure. Nano Lett. 2017;17:2532–2538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Zhang N, Wang Z, et al. Endogenous catalytic generation of O2 bubbles for in situ ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Acs Nano. 2017;11:9093–9102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bez M, Sheyn D, Tawackoli W, et al. In situ bone tissue engineering via ultrasound-mediated gene delivery to endogenous progenitor cells in mini-pigs. Sci Transl Med. 2017 [cited May 17]; DOI:10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian X, Zheng Y, Chen Y. Micro/nanoparticle-augmented sonodynamic therapy (SDT): breaking the depth shallow of photoactivation. Adv Mater. 2016;28:8097–8129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale AP, Callan JF, Nomikou N, et al. Sonodynamic therapy: concept, mechanism and application to cancer treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;880:429–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon YI, Kwon YS, Cho HS, et al. Ultrasound-mediated gene and drug delivery using a microbubble-liposome particle system. Theranostics. 2014;4:1133–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro G, Wong AW, Bez M, et al. Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation. J Control Release. 2016;223:157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling F, Fokong S, Bzyl J, et al. Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang P, Qian X, Chen Y, et al. Metalloporphyrin-encapsulated biodegradable nano systems for highly efficient magnetic resonance imaging-guided sonodynamic cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:1275–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebsch N, Kearney CJ, Zhao X, et al. Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:9762–9767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Gao J, Jiang L, et al. Nanohybrid liposomal cerasomes with good physiological stability and rapid temperature responsiveness for high intensity focused ultrasound triggered local chemotherapy of cancer. Acs Nano. 2015;9:1280–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey VF . Ultrasound and matter-physical interactions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93:195–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biffi S, Voltan R, Rampazzo E, et al. Applications of nanoparticles in cancer medicine and beyond: optical and multimodal in vivo imaging, tissue targeting and drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015;12:1837–1849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sboros V. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1117–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia A, Madonna RD, Lago S, et al. Evidence for liquid phase reactions during single bubble acoustic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2004;11:317–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers R, Moonen CT. Ultrasound triggered, image guided, local drug delivery. J Control Release. 2010;148:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, et al. Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staruch R, Chopra R, Hynynen K. Localised drug release using MRI-controlled focused ultrasound hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27:156–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan A, Jacobs G, Woods DL, et al. Image-guided drug delivery with magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound and temperature sensitive liposomes in a rabbit Vx2 tumor model. J Control Release. 2012;158:487–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Bjerknes Ferlag Von Friedrich Vieweg Und Sohn., 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock HA, Smith LH, Cuesta J, et al. Investigations into pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound-enhanced delivery: preliminary evidence for a novel mechanism. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1722–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel V, Etherington A, Greene M, et al. Delivery of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in a breast cancer tumor model: investigation of potential enhancement by pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound exposure. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuh EL, Shulman SG, Mehta SA, et al. Delivery of systemic chemotherapeutic agent to tumors by using focused ultrasound: study in a murine model. Radiology. 2005;234:431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar KM, Xie J, Hunter F, et al. Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound enhances systemic administration of naked DNA in squamous cell carcinoma model: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;235:541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Sit WH, Wan JM, et al. Sonoporation induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human promyelocytic leukemia cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:2149–2159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa K. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet. 1999;353:1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan FR. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: Implication for drug delivery. J Control Release. 2005;104:213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León G, Martínez G, Guzmán MA, et al. Increasing stability and transport efficiency of supported liquid membranes through a novel ultrasound-assisted preparation method. Its application to cobalt (II) removal. Ultrason Sonochem. 2013;20:650–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Du J, Li X, et al. miR-509-3p promotes cisplatin-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through the regulation of anti-apoptotic genes. Pharmacogenomics. 2017;18:1671–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, et al. Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37:13–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders NR, Ek CJ, Habgood MD, et al. Barriers in the brain: a renaissance?. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31:279–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders NR, Liddelow SA, Dziegielewska KM. Barrier mechanisms in the developing brain. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redzic Z. Molecular biology of the blood-brain and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers: similarities and differences. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011;8:1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott NJ. Blood-brain barrier structure and function and the challenges for CNS drug delivery. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013;36:437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Mao KL, Tian FR, et al. Brain tumor-targeted delivery and therapy by focused ultrasound introduced doxorubicin-loaded cationic liposomes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77:269–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal M, Park J, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Enhancement in blood-tumor barrier permeability and delivery of liposomal doxorubicin using focused ultrasound and microbubbles: evaluation during tumor progression in a rat glioma model. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:2511–2527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Hsieh HY, Huang CY, et al. Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening to enhance interleukin-12 delivery for brain tumor immunotherapy: a preclinical feasibility study. J Transl Med. 2015;13:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin WT, Chen RC, Lu WW, et al. Protective effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on aluminum-induced cerebral damage in Alzheimer’s disease rat model. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samiotaki G, Acosta C, Wang S, et al. Enhanced delivery and bioactivity of the neurturin neurotrophic factor through focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier opening in vivo. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao L, Song Q, Bai W, et al. Facilitated brain delivery of poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (lactic acid) nanoparticles by microbubble-enhanced unfocused ultrasound. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3384–3395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Cheng YH, Chien-Yu T, et al. Ultrasound/magnetic targeting with SPIO-DOX-microbubble complex for image-guided drug delivery in brain tumors. Theranostics. 2016;6:1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling L, Cai X, Guo R, et al. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease in rats by Nrf2 transfection using MRI-guided focused ultrasound delivery of nanomicrobubbles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;482:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Chang EL, Ting CY, et al. Folate-conjugated gene-carrying microbubbles with focused ultrasound for concurrent blood-brain barrier opening and local gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2016;106:46–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Ting CY, Lin CY, et al. Noninvasive, targeted, and non-viral ultrasound-mediated GDNF-plasmid delivery for treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Olumolade OO, Sun T, et al. Non-invasive, neuron-specific gene therapy can be facilitated by focused ultrasound and recombinant adeno-associated virus. Gene Ther. 2015;22:104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Ayalagrosso CA, Ganguly M, et al. Targeted delivery of neural stem cells to the brain using MRI-guided focused ultrasound to disrupt the blood-brain barrier. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkins R, Burgess A, Francia G, et al. Nt-02early treatment of her2-amplified brain tumours with targeted nk-92 cells and focused ultrasound improves survival. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;42:S11.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Jin K, Pang Q, et al. On-demand drug release from dual-targeting small nanoparticles triggered by high-intensity focused ultrasound enhanced glioblastoma-targeting therapy. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:31612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead BP, Kim N, Miller GW, et al. Novel focused ultrasound gene therapy approach noninvasively restores dopaminergic neuron function in a rat Parkinson’s disease model. Nano Lett. 2017;17:3533–3542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Wang TY, Willmann JK. Sonoporation: applications for cancer therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;880:263–291.
   Google Scholar
• Yan F, Li L, Deng Z, et al. Paclitaxel-liposome-microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J Control Release. 2013;166:246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing L, Shi Q, Zheng K, et al. Ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction (UMMD) facilitates the delivery of CA19-9 targeted and paclitaxel loaded mPEG-PLGA-PLL nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer. Theranostics. 2016;6:1573–1587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo W, Wen G, Yang L, et al. Dual-targeted and pH-sensitive doxorubicin prodrug-microbubble complex with ultrasound for tumor treatment. Theranostics. 2017;7:452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotopoulis S, Dimcevski G, Gilja OH, et al. Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: a clinical case study. Med Phys. 2013;40:72902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Qiao Q, Han X, et al. Targeted nanobubbles in low-frequency ultrasound-mediated gene transfection and growth inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Tumor Biol. 2016;37:12113–12121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo MH, Yeh CK, Situ B, et al. Microbubbles: a novel strategy for chemotherapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23:3383–3390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TY, Choe JW, Pu K, et al. Ultrasound-guided delivery of microRNA loaded nanoparticles into cancer. J Control Release. 2015;203:99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopechek JA, Carson AR, Mctiernan CF, et al. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction-mediated delivery of a transcription factor decoy inhibits STAT3 signaling and tumor growth. Theranostics. 2015;5:1378–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Yang X, Min P, et al. Hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery from iRGD-modified temperature-sensitive liposomes enhances the anti-tumor efficacy using high intensity focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2016;243:333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanosdol J, Ektate K, Ramasami S, et al. Sequential HIFU heating and nanobubble encapsulation provide efficient drug penetration from stealth and temperature sensitive liposomes in colon cancer. J Control Release. 2016;247:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G, Darr DB, Santos CM, et al. Effects of tumor microenvironment heterogeneity on nanoparticle disposition and efficacy in breast cancer tumor models. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:6083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Han H, Koo H, et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling in vivo for enhancing tumor-targeting efficiency of nanoparticle drug carriers using the pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2017;263:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Xiong X, Pandya D, et al. Enhancing tissue permeability with MRI guided preclinical focused ultrasound system in rabbit muscle: from normal tissue to VX2 tumor. J Control Release. 2017;256:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Li Y, Wang Z, et al. Evaluation of HIFU ablation for uterine fibroids: an IDEAL prospective exploration study. BJOG. 2018;125:354–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Xie H, Luo M, et al. PBA2 exhibits potent anti-tumor activity via suppression of VEGFR2 mediated-cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;150:131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Gu H, Xu Y, et al. Targeted antiangiogenesis gene therapy using targeted cationic microbubbles conjugated with CD105 antibody compared with untargeted cationic and neutral microbubbles. Theranostics. 2015;5:399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Tang P, He G, et al. Hemocoagulase combined with microbubble-enhanced ultrasound cavitation for augmented ablation of microvasculature in rabbit VX2 liver tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43:1658–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnota GJ, Karshafian R, Burns PN, et al. Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumita N, Nishigaki R, Umemura K, et al. Hematoporphyrin as a sensitizer of cell-damaging effect of ultrasound. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1989;80:219–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Umemura S, Yumita N, Umemura K, et al. Ultrasonic apparatus for therapeutical use. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Kou J, Han X, et al. ROS-dependent activation of autophagy through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is induced by hydroxysafflor yellow a-sonodynamic therapy in THP-1 macrophages. Oxidat Med Cell Long. 2017;2017:8519169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deepagan VG, You DG, Um W, et al. Long-circulating Au-TiO2 nanocomposite as a sonosensitizer for ROS-mediated eradication of cancer. Nano Lett. 2016;16:6257–6264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcewan C, Owen J, Stride E, et al. Oxygen carrying microbubbles for enhanced sonodynamic therapy of hypoxic tumours. J Control Release. 2015;203:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcewan C, Kamila S, Owen J, et al. Combined sonodynamic and antimetabolite therapy for the improved treatment of pancreatic cancer using oxygen loaded microbubbles as a delivery vehicle. Biomaterials. 2016;80:20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YW, Liu TY, Chang PH, et al. A theranostic nrGO@MSN-ION nanocarrier developed to enhance the combination effect of sonodynamic therapy and ultrasound hyperthermia for treating tumor. Nanoscale. 2016;8:12648–12657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou N, Curtis K, Mcewan C, et al. A versatile, stimulus-responsive nanoparticle-based platform for use in both sonodynamic and photodynamic cancer therapy. Acta Biomater. 2017;49:414–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Wang M, Pan W, et al. Tumor microenvironment-triggered fabrication of gold nanomachines for tumor-specific photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. Chem Sci. 2017;8:4896–4903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Chen Z, Wang B, et al. ROS-manipulated drug release from a smart envelope-type mesoporous titanium nanovehicle for tumor sonodynamic-chemotherapy. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:28554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YZ, Tian XQ, Zhang M, et al. Functional and pathological improvements of the hearts in diabetes model by the combined therapy of bFGF-loaded nanoparticles with ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. J Control Release. 2014;186:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwekkeboom RF, Sluijter JP, Van MB, et al. Increased local delivery of antagomir therapeutics to the rodent myocardium using ultrasound and microbubbles. J Control Release. 2016;222:18–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Feng X, Lof J, et al. Utilization of modified diagnostic ultrasound and microbubbles to reduce myocardial infarct size. Coronary Artery Disease. 2015;101:1468.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Sun Z, Ren P, et al. Localized delivery of shRNA against PHD2 protects the heart from acute myocardial infarction through ultrasound-targeted cationic microbubble destruction. Theranostics. 2017;7:51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yannik G, Jathushan P, et al. Thrombus-targeted theranostic microbubbles: a new technology towards concurrent rapid ultrasound diagnosis and bleeding-free fibrinolytic treatment of thrombosis. Theranostics. 2016;6:726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan P, Chen KJ, Wu J, et al. The use of MMP2 antibody-conjugated cationic microbubble to target the ischemic myocardium, enhance Timp3 gene transfection and improve cardiac function. Biomaterials. 2014;35:1063–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woudstra L, Krijnen PAJ, Bogaards SJP, et al. Development of a new therapeutic technique to direct stem cells to the infarcted heart using targeted microbubbles: StemBells. Stem Cell Res. 2016;17:6–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wu S, Liu Z, et al. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction improves the migration and homing of mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction by upregulating SDF-1/CXCR4: a pilot study. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:691310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbie KF, Mead BP, Price RJ. Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2015;219:61–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Aryal M, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Evaluation of permeability, doxorubicin delivery, and drug retention in a rat brain tumor model after ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption. J Control Release. 2016;250:77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbie KF, Afzal U, Date A, et al. MR image-guided delivery of cisplatin-loaded brain-penetrating nanoparticles to invasive glioma with focused ultrasound. J Control Release 2017;263:120–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Deng J, Wang F, et al. Targeted gene delivery to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Hsieh HY, Chen CM, et al. Non-invasive, neuron-specific gene therapy by focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in Parkinson’s disease mouse model. J Control Release. 2016;235:72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead BP, Mastorakos P, Suk JS, et al. Targeted gene transfer to the brain via the delivery of brain-penetrating DNA nanoparticles with focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2016;223:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EN. The effect of high frequency sound waves on heart muscle and other irritable tissues. Am J Physiol – Legacy Content. 1929;91:284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Tufail Y, Matyushov A, Baldwin N, et al. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron. 2010;66:681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S, Tong A, Schutt C, et al. Sonogenetics is a non-invasive approach to activating neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elisabetta S, Natalia V. Acoustic neuromodulation from a basic science prospective. J Ther Ultrasound. 2016;4:17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Wang J, Wang K, et al. Ultrasound neuro-modulation chip: activation of sensory neurons in caenorhabditis elegans by surface acoustic waves. Lab Chip. 2017;17:1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubanek J, Shi J, Marsh J, et al. Ultrasound modulates ion channel currents. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattiez N, Constans C, Deffieux T, et al. Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation modulates single-neuron discharge in macaques performing an antisaccade task. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:1024–1031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu PC, Liu HL, Lai HY, et al. Neuromodulation accompanying focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou N, Feichtinger GA, Saha S, et al. Ultrasound‐responsive gene‐activated matrices (GAMs) for osteogenic gene therapy using matrix‐assisted sonoporation (MAS). J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 [cited Jan 13]. DOI:10.1002/term.2406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei FY, Chow SK, Leung KS, et al. Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration enhanced mesenchymal stem cell recruitment in osteoporotic fracture healing through the SDF-1/CXCR4 pathway. Ecm. 2016;31:341–354.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang X, Tang Y, Leng Q, et al. Targeted gene delivery to the synovial pannus in antigen-induced arthritis by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction in vivo. Ultrasonics. 2016;65:304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Arai Y, Kishida T, et al. Sonoporation-mediated transduction of siRNA ameliorated experimental arthritis using 3 MHz pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2014;54:874–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen HJ, Ylitalo T, Suuronen JP, et al. Delivering agents locally into articular cartilage by intense MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:2259–2265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao AH, Chung HY, Chen WS, et al. Efficacy of combined ultrasound-and-microbubbles-mediated diclofenac gel delivery to enhance transdermal permeation in adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis in the Rat. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:1976–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Q, Cui J, Tian Z, et al. Oxygen and indocyanine green loaded phase-transition nanoparticle-mediated photo-sonodynamic cytotoxic effects on rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. IJN. 2017;12:381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Fadini GP, Ciciliot S, Albiero M. Concise review: perspectives and clinical implications of bone marrow and circulating stem cell defects in diabetes. Stem Cells. 2017;35:106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao L, Zhang Y, Lan B, et al. MiRNA-sequence indicates that mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes have similar mechanism to enhance cardiac repair. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4150705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Zhao Q, Biswas S. Methods of reactivation and reprogramming of neural stem cells for neural repair. Methods. 2018;133:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Zhuo Z, Yang B, et al. Enhanced homing ability and retention of bone marrow stromal cells to diabetic nephropathy by microbubble-mediated diagnostic ultrasound irradiation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:2977–2989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu YL, Gao YZ, Tan KB, et al. Myocardium-targeted transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells by diagnostic ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction improves cardiac function in myocardial infarction of New Zealand rabbits. Int J Cardiol. 2010;138:182–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burks SR, Nguyen BA, Tebebi PA, et al. Pulsed focused ultrasound pretreatment improves mesenchymal stromal cell efficacy in preventing and rescuing established acute kidney injury in mice. Stem Cells. 2015;33:1241–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokhuis TJ, Skachkov I, Naaijkens BA, et al. Intravital microscopy of localized stem cell delivery using microbubbles and acoustic radiation force. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasaki R, Mukudai Y, Yoshizawa Y, et al. A combination of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and nanohydroxyapatite concordantly enhances osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells from buccal fat pad. Cell Med. 2015;7:123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Kim J, Seonwoo H, et al. In vitro effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation on the osteogenic differentiation of human alveolar bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tooth tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:269724.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haber T, Baruch L, Machluf M. Ultrasound-mediated mesenchymal stem cells transfection as a targeted cancer therapy platform. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris JL, De LTP, Victoria CM, et al. Vectorization of ultrasound-responsive nanoparticles in placental mesenchymal stem cells for cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2017;9:5528–5537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Lu J, Kong X, et al. Dynamic nanoparticle assemblies for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1605897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen H, Zhang K, et al. An intelligent nanotheranostic agent for targeting, redox-responsive ultrasound imaging, and imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound synergistic therapy. Small. 2014;10:1403–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chen Y, Yan F, et al. Ultrasound molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression for endometrial receptivity evaluation. Theranostics. 2015;5:206–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam K, Stanczak M, Forsberg F, et al. Sentinel lymph node characterization with a dual-targeted molecular ultrasound contrast agent. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018;20:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra SK, Ghoshal G, Gartia MR, et al. Tri-modal therapy: combining hyperthermia with repurposed bexarotene and ultrasound for treating liver cancer. Acs Nano. 2015;9:10695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ektate K, Kapoor A, Maples D, et al. Motion compensated ultrasound imaging allows thermometry and image guided drug delivery monitoring from echogenic liposomes. Theranostics. 2016;6:1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina SH, Michie MS, Miller SE, et al. Fluorous phase-directed peptide assembly affords nano-peptisomes capable of ultrasound-triggered cellular delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:11404–11408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Ratnayaka S, Alford A, et al. Theranostic multilayer capsules for ultrasound imaging and guided drug delivery. Acs Nano. 2017;11:3135–3146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papa AL, Korin N, Kanapathipillai M, et al. Ultrasound-sensitive nanoparticle aggregates for targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2017;139:187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong J, Teo JY, Aakalu VK, et al. Engineering polymersomes for diagnostics and therapy. Adv Healthcare Mat. 2018 [cited Jan 15]. DOI:10.1002/adhm.201701276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Lin J, Wang T, et al. Recent advances in photoacoustic imaging for deep-tissue biomedical applications. Theranostics. 2016;6:2394–2413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YJ, Huang CC, Wan WL, et al. Recent advances in CO2, bubble-generating carrier systems for localized controlled release. Biomaterials. 2017;133:154–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Li M, Liu Y, et al. Glucose and magnetic-responsive approach toward in situ nitric oxide bubbles controlled generation for hyperglycemia theranostics. J Control Release. 2016;228:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SM, Lee T, Willmann JK. Ultrasound-guided drug delivery in cancer. Ultrasonography. 2017;36:171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varelias A, Gartlan KH, Kreijveld E, et al. Lung parenchyma-derived IL-6 promotes IL-17A-dependent acute lung injury after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2015;125:2435–2444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Zhang P, Ren J, et al. Synergistic effects of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction and TAT peptide on gene transfection: an experimental study in vitro and in vivo. J Control Release. 2013;170:437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Xu Y, Zhong Z, et al . A large-scale investigation of hypoxia-preconditioned allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for myocardial repair in nonhuman primates: paracrine activity without remuscularization. Circ Res. 2016;118:970–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokerst JV, Khademi C, Gambhir SS. Intracellular aggregation of multimodal silica nanoparticles for ultrasound-guided stem cell implantation. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:135r–177r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burks SR, Ziadloo A, Kim SJ, et al. Noninvasive pulsed focused ultrasound allows spatiotemporal control of targeted homing for multiple stem cell types in murine skeletal muscle and the magnitude of cell homing can be increased through repeated applications. Stem Cells. 2013;31:2551–2560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemair W, Tukovic Z, Jasak H, et al. The breakup of intravascular microbubbles and its impact on the endothelium. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017;16:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebouvier A, Poignard A, Cavet M, et al. Development of a simple procedure for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis with intra-osseous injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: study of their biodistribution in the early time points after injection. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikov N, Mcdannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30:979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, Mcdannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits1. Radiology 2001;220:640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Liu HL, Huang CY, et al. Detection of intracerebral hemorrhage and transient blood-supply shortage in focused-ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption by ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1372–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng JC, Wu SK, Yang FY, et al. Pulse sequence and timing of contrast‐enhanced MRI for assessing blood–brain barrier disruption after transcranial focused ultrasound in the presence of hemorrhage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:1323–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song KH, Hinkle JJ, Newman J, et al. Microbubble gas volume: a unifying dose parameter in blood-brain barrier opening by focused ultrasound. Theranostics. 2017;7:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum AF, Borden MA, Dayton PA, et al. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. J Control Release. 2006;111:128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Xu K, Bi Y, et al. Low intensity ultrasound promotes the sensitivity of rat brain glioma to doxorubicin by down-regulating the expressions of P-glucoprotein and multidrug resistance protein 1 in vitro and in vivo. PLos One. 2013;8:e70685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryal M, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang YZ, et al. Multiple sessions of liposomal doxorubicin delivery via focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain barrier disruption: a safety study. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;204:60.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford L, Rosch J, Putnam D. Concepts, technologies, and practices for drug delivery past the blood–brain barrier to the central nervous system. J Control Release. 2015;240:251–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MM, Patel BM. Crossing the blood-brain barrier: recent advances in drug delivery to the brain. Cns Drugs. 2017;31:109–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu N, Yao G, Liu Y, et al. Newly synthesized bis-benzimidazole compound 8 induces apoptosis, autophagy and reactive oxygen species generation in HeLa cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:4367–4371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley D, Mc EC, Fowley C, et al. Treating cancer with sonodynamic therapy: a review. Int J Hyperther. 2015;31:107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Zhu XQ, Xu ZL, et al. Increased infiltration of activated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation of human breast cancer. Surgery. 2009;145:286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestrini MT, Ingham ES, Mahakian LM, et al. Priming is key to effective incorporation of image-guided thermal ablation into immunotherapy protocols. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e90521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van RDB, Eikelenboom DC, Hoogenboom M, et al. Thermal and mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound: perspectives on tumor ablation, immune effects and combination strategies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2016;66:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran LF, Xie XP, Xia JZ, et al. Specific antitumour immunity of HIFU-activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes after adoptive transfusion in tumour-bearing mice. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;32:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley CT, Sheybani ND, Bullock TN, et al. Focused ultrasound immunotherapy for central nervous system pathologies: challenges and opportunities. Theranostics. 2017;7:3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Yoon S, Sun J, et al. Mechanogenetics for the remote and noninvasive control of cancer immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:992–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durot I, Wilson SR, Willmann JK. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of malignant liver lesions. Abdom Radiol 2018;43:819–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back SJ, Maya C, Darge K, et al. Pediatric contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the United States: a survey by the contrast-enhanced ultrasound task force of the society for pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 [cited Feb 13]. DOI:10.1007/s00247-018-4088-x
   Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Antkowiak P, Asefa A, et al. FDA regulation of neurological and physical medicine devices: access to safe and effective neurotechnologies for all americans. Neuron 2016;92:943–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar