38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Network Governance for School Turnaround: A Case Study Exploration of Third-Party Actors in China

References

  • Bach, T., and E. Ruffing. 2013. Networking for autonomy? National agencies in European networks. Public Administration 91 (3):712–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02093.x.
  • Ball, S. J. 2008. New philanthropy, new networks and new governance in eudcation. Political Studies 56 (4):747–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x.
  • Ball, S. J. 2009. Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state. Journal of Education Policy 24 (1):83–99. doi:10.1080/02680930802419474.
  • Ball, S. J., and C. Junemann. 2012. Networks, new governance and education. London: The Policy Press.
  • Barber, M. 1998. The dark side of the moon: Imagining an end to failure in urban education. In No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulty, ed. L. Stoll and K. Myers, 17–33. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Barber, M. 2003. Deliverable goals and strategies challenges: A view from England on reconceptualising public education. In Network of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems, ed. OECD, 113–30. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Bogdan, R. C., and S. K. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Cai, Y., J. Lei, and X. Shen. 2014. The implications of American teacher transfer incentives on China’s weak urban schools’ improvement (In Chinese). Comparative Education Review (12):68–73.
  • Central Committee of CPC & State Council. 2019. Chinese Education Modernization 2035. Beijing: Central Committee of CPC & State Council.
  • Chan, P. W. K. 2019. Public education reform and network governance: Lessons from Chinese state-owned enterprise schools. London: Routledge.
  • Chapman, C. 2008. Towards a framework for school-to-school networking in challenging circumstances. Educational Research 50 (4):403–20. doi:10.1080/00131880802499894.
  • Chapman, C., and D. Muijs. 2013. Collaborative school turnaround: A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. Leadership and Policy in Schools 12 (3):200–26. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.831456.
  • Childs, J., and J. L. Russell. 2017. Improving low-achieving schools: Building state capacity to support school improvement through Race to the Top. Urban Education 52 (2):236–66. doi:10.1177/0042085916656899.
  • Chu, H., and J. e Jia. 2014. The multiple participants and their complement in education governance (In Chinese). Exploring Education Development (19):1–7.
  • Corbett, J. 2014. School turnaround in England: Utilizing the private sector. San Francisco: WestED.
  • Cummings, M. I., and J. D. Olson. 2020. The importance and potential of community partnerships in urban schools in an era of high-stakes accountability. Improving Schools 23 (2):109–24. doi:10.1177/1365480219880129.
  • Du, M., and G. Fan. 2017. The participation in education of the social organization: Mechanisms and strategies (In Chinese). Educational Research (2):60–4.
  • Ehren, M., and J. Perryman. 2018. Accountability of school networks: Who is accountable to whom and for what? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (6):942–59. doi:10.1177/1741143217717272.
  • Fan, L. 2017. Chinese society’s governance strategies from the perspective of network governance (In Chinese). Social Scientist 12:48–52.
  • Fulda, A., Y. Li, and Q. Song. 2012. New strategies of civil society in China: A case study of the network governance approach. Journal of Contemporary China 21 (76):675–93. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.666837.
  • Futernick, K., and A. Urbanski. 2014. Successful school turnarounds through labor–management partnerships: The role for state education agencies. In The state role in school turnaround: Emerging best practices, ed. L. M. Rhm and S. Redding, 65–80. San Francisco: WestEd.
  • Gall, M. D., J. P. Gall, and W. R. Borg. 2007. Educational research: An introduction. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson.
  • Goldsmith, S., and W. D. Eggers. 2004. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Goodwin, M. 2009. Which networks matter in education governance? A reply to Ball’s “new philanthropy, new networks and new governance in education.” Political Studies 57 (3):680–7. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00804.x.
  • Goodwin, M., and J. Grix. 2011. Bringing structures back in: The “governance narrative,” the “decentred approach” and “asymmetrical network governance” in the education and sport policy communities. Public Administration 89 (2):537–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01921.x.
  • Guo, Q. 2013. Balanced development of complusory education and construction of rural weak schools (In Chinese). Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 52 (1):161–8.
  • Hines, E. M., J. L. Moore, R. D. Mayes, P. C. Harris, D. Vega, D. V. Robinson, C. N. Gray, and C. E. Jackson. 2020. Making student achievement a priority: The role of school counselors in turnaround schools. Urban Education 55 (2):216–37. doi:10.1177/0042085916685761.
  • Huang, C., H. Yi, T. Chen, X. Xu, and S. Chen. 2022. Networked environmental governance: Formal and informal collaborative networks in local China. Policy Studies 43 (3):403–21. doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1758306.
  • Jensen, B., and J. Sonnemann. 2014. Turning around schools: It can be done. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
  • Jin, Y. 2015. Weak school reform and development in China in last three decades (In Chinese). Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method 35 (10):3–9.
  • Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti. 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review 22 (4):911–45. doi:10.2307/259249.
  • Kabir, A. H. 2021. “Network governance” and the formation of the strategic plan in the higher education sector in Bangladesh. Journal of Education Policy 36 (4):455–79. doi:10.1080/02680939.2020.1717637.
  • Katz, S., and L. Earl. 2010. Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1):27–51. doi:10.1080/09243450903569718.
  • Kettl, D. F. 2009. The key to networked government. In Unlocking the power of networks: Keys to high-performance government, ed. S. Goldsmith and D. F. Kettl, 1–14. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Klijn, E. H., and J. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance networks in the public sector. New York: Routledge.
  • Leithwood, K., A. Harris, and T. Strauss. 2010. Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Li, H., and H. Bai. 2009. No school left behind: Effective measures of improving weak schools in foreign countries (In Chinese). Comparative Education Review (6):52–6.
  • Li, S., W. Liu, and J. Yue. 2012. On the improvement of teachers’ scientific research level in the disadvantaged schools from the perspective of balanced development of education (In Chinese). Theory and Practice of Education 32 (28):29–32.
  • Liu, P. 2017. Transforming turnaround schools in China: A review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 28 (1):74–101. doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1239641.
  • Liu, Y., and W. Yang. 2019. Leadership and governance tools for village sustainable development in China. Sustainability 11 (20):5553. doi:10.3390/su11205553.
  • Ma, Q. 2002. The governance of NGOs in China since 1978: How much autonomy? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31 (3):305–28. doi:10.1177/0899764002313001.
  • Macdonald, D., R. Johnson, and B. Lingard. 2020. Globalisation, neoliberalisation, and network governance: An international study of outsourcing in health and physical education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 41 (2):169–86. doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1722422.
  • Marsh, D., D. Richards, and M. Smith. 2003. Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric power model of British politics. Government and Opposition 38 (3):306–32. doi:10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00017.
  • Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Meyers, C. V., and J. Murphy. 2007. Turning around failing schools: An analysis. Journal of School Leadership 17 (5):631–59. doi:10.1177/105268460701700504.
  • Myers, K., and H. Goldstein. 1998. Who’s failing?. In No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulty, ed. L. Stoll and K. Myers, 175–88. London: The Falmer Press.
  • O’Toole, L. J. Jr. 2014. Networks and networking: The public administrative agendas. Public Administration Review 75 (3):361–71.
  • Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2007. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2):229–52. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44 (4):652–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies 28 (8):1243–64. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586.
  • Shang, W. 2016. Research on the innovative mode of public service supply of pre-school education under the horizon of network governance (In Chinese). Academic Exploration 2:121–6.
  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2017. Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration 47 (7):826–39. doi:10.1177/0275074016643181.
  • State Council. 2001. Decision on basic education reform and development (In Chinese). http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201412/t20141217_181775.html
  • Stoll, L. 2009. Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change 10 (2–3):115–27. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3.
  • Suri, H. 2011. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal 11 (2):63–75. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102063.
  • Tang, R., J. Gong, and T. Qi. 2020. Research on the network governance of government purchasing of public library services (In Chinese). Library Theory and Practice (3):43–7.
  • Tao, Y. 2021a. School turnaround through network governance: The role of turnaround schools in China’s Shanghai city. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 33 (1):86–103. doi:10.1080/09243453.2021.1942929.
  • Tao, Y. 2021b. Towards network governance: Educational reforms and governance changes in China (1985–2020). Asia Pacific Education Review 23 (3):375–88. doi:10.1007/s12564-021-09704-x.
  • Tao, Y. 2022. The historical evolution and future prospect of Chinese school turnaround from the perspective of education poverty alleviation (In Chinese). In Education policy review in China (2021), ed. Z. Yuan. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
  • Tao, Y., and S. Liu. 2022. Network governance in education: The experiences and struggles of local governments in Chinese school turnaround. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 42 (2):305–19. doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1792828.
  • VanGronigen, B. A., and C. V. Meyers. 2019. How state education agencies are administering school turnaround efforts: 15 years after No Child Left Behind. Educational Policy 33 (3):423–52. doi:10.1177/0895904817691846.
  • Xia, M. 2008. The People’s Congresses and governance in China: Toward a network mode of governance. London: Routledge.
  • Xiao, F., and M. Jia. 2016. Mechanism, dillemma and thoughts about the participation of industry associations in modern vocational education governance (In Chinese). Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition) 42 (4):84–91.
  • Yang, M. 2016. Modernizing education governance calls for third-party evaluation (In Chinese). Exploring Education Development (6):3.
  • Yao, Y., and X. Fan. 2013. Endogenous development: Approach selection of turnaround school transformation (In Chinese). Journal of the Chinese Society of Education 4:37–45.
  • Zavadsky, H. 2012. School turnarounds: The essential role of districts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Zhang, J. 2013. Motivation, value and deepening strategies of delegated administration of weak schools: Prospective in social capital (In Chinese). Exploring Education Development 20:12–7.
  • Zheng, H., M. D. Jong, and J. Koppenjan. 2010. Applying policy network theory to policy-making in China: The case of urban health insurance reform. Public Administration 88 (2):398–417. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01822.x.
  • Zhou, C., and L. Zhou. 2019. The formation mechanism and improvement path of weak schools from the perspective of cultural sociology (In Chinese). Theory Monthly (8):154–60.
  • Zhou, Z. 2012. The rebuilding and developing of disadvantaged schools from the perspective of urban relationships (In Chinese). Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University 11 (2):27–31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.