Aerodynamic optimisation of a parametrised engine pylon on a mission path using the adjoint method

References

• Banović, Mladen, Mykhaskiv Orest, Auriemma Salvatore, Walther Andrea, Legrand Herve, and Müller Jens-Dominik. 2018. “Algorithmic Differentiation of the Open CASCADE Technology CAD Kernel and Its Coupling with an Adjoint CFD Solver.” Optimization Methods and Software 33 (4–6): 813–828. doi: 10.1080/10556788.2018.1431235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambier, Laurent, Heib Sébastien, and Plot Sylvie. 2013. “The Onera ElsA CFD Software: Input From Research and Feedback From Industry.” Mechanics & Industry 14 (3): 159–174. doi: 10.1051/meca/2013056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, B. 1988. “Computation and Comparison of the Installation Effects of Compression Pylons for a High Wing Transport.” AIAA 1988-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Destarac, Daniel, and Joël Reneaux. 1993. “Applications de l’optimisation numérique á l’aérodynamique des avions de transport.” La Recherche Aérospatiale (2): 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dwight, Richard P., and Brezillon Joël. 2006. “Effect of Approximations of the Discrete Adjoint on Gradient-Based Optimization.” AIAA Journal 44 (12): 3022–3031. doi: 10.2514/1.21744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallard, François. 2014. “Aircraft Shape Optimization for Mission Performance.” PhD diss., INP Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Gallard, François, Charlie Vanaret, Damien Guénot, Vincent Gachelin, Rémi Lafage, Benoit Pauwels, Pierre-Jean Barjhoux, and Anne Gazaix. 2018. “GEMS: A Python Library for Automation of Multi-disciplinary Design Optimization Process Generation.” AIAA 2018-0657.
   Google Scholar
• Gallard, François, Mohammadi Bijan, Montagnac Marc, and Meaux Matthieu. 2015. “An Adaptive Multipoint Formulation for Robust Parametric Optimization.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 167 (2): 693–715. doi: 10.1007/s10957-014-0595-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazaix, Anne, François Gallard, Vincent Gachelin, Thierry Druot, Stéphane Grihon, Vincent Ambert, Damien Guénot, et al. 2017. “Towards the Industrialization of New MDO Methodologies and Tools for Aircraft Design.” AIAA 2017-3149.
   Google Scholar
• Gisin, Yevgeniy M., and David D. Marshall. 2007. “Wing-Nacelle Assembly Multidisciplinary Performance Optimization.” AIAA 2007-1463.
   Google Scholar
• Gratton, Serge, Philippe L. Toint, and Anke Tröoltzsch. 2011. How Much Gradient Noise Does a Gradient-based Linesearch Method Tolerate? Technical Report TR/PA/11/126. CERFACS.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, K. C., P. H. Rees, and J. K. Chu. 1998. “Aerodynamic Design Optimisation Applied to Civil Transports with Underwing Mounted Engines.” In Proceedings of ICAS Conference, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Raymond M., and Henne Preston A. 1978. “Wing Design by Numerical Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 15: 407–412. doi: 10.2514/3.58379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, Antony. 1982. “Steady State Solutions of the Euler Equations for Transonic Flow by a Multigrid Method, Chap.” Advances in Scientific Computing, 37–70. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koc, Salim, Hyoung-Jin Kim, and Kazuhiro Nakahashi. 2005. “Aerodynamic Design of Wing-Body-Nacelle-Pylon Configuration.” AIAA 2005-4856.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jing, Gao Zhenghong, Huang Jiangtao, and Zhao Ke. 2013. “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of Nacelle/Pylon Position on an Aircraft.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 26: 850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu, Zhoujie, Gaetan K. Kenway, Cody Paige, and Joaquim Martins. 2013. “Automatic Differentiation Adjoint of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations with a Turbulence Model.” AIAA 2013-2581.
   Google Scholar
• Meaux, Mathieu, Marianne Cormery, and Guillaume Voizard. 2004. “Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on the Discrete Adjoint State for 3D Industrial Configurations.” ECCOMAS.
   Google Scholar
• Montanelli, Hadrien, Marc Montagnac, and François Gallard. 2015. “Gradient Span Analysis Method: Application to the Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Turbine Cascade.” Journal of Turbomachinery 137 (9). doi: 10.1115/1.4030016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouton, Sylvain, Julien Laurenceau, and Gérald Carrier. 2007. “Aerodynamic and Structural Optimization of Power-plant Integration Under the Wing of a Transonic Transport Aircraft.” In Proceedings of 42th AAAF Symposium on Applied Aerodynamics, Nice.
   Google Scholar
• Naik, Dinesh A., Anthony M. Ingraldi, and Odis C. Pendergraft Jr. 1992. “Experimental Study of Pylon Geometries for Transport Aircraft.” AIAA 1992-0153.
   Google Scholar
• Piegl, Les and Wayne Tiller. 1997. The NURBS Book. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, P. L. 1981. “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes.” Journal of Computational Physics 43 (2): 357–372. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusch, Konstantin, Martin Siggel, and Richard-Gregor Becker. 2018. “Reproducing Existing Nacelle Geometries With the Free-Form Deformation Parametrization.” ASME Turbo Expo.
   Google Scholar
• Samareh, Jamshid A. 2001. “Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques for High-Fidelity Multidisciplinary Shape Optimization.” AIAA Journal 39: 877–884. doi: 10.2514/2.1391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secco, Ney R., and Joaquim R. R. A. Martins. 2019. “RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing with Overset Meshes.” 56: 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Sederberg, Thomas W., and Scott R. Parry. 1986. “Free-form Deformation of Solid Geometric Models.” In SIGGRAPH Proceedings, 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, S. N., and H. Zare-Behtash. 2018. “State-of-the-Art in Aerodynamic Shape Optimisation Methods.” Applied Soft Computing 62: 933–962. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, Jaroslaw. 1999. Parametric Airfoils and Wings, 71–87. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Van Albada, Gale Dick, Bram van Leer, and Williams W. Roberts. 1982. “A Comparative Study of Computational Methods in Cosmic Gas Dynamics.” Astronomy and Astrophysics 108: 76–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leer, Bram. 1979. “Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. V. A Second-Order Sequel to Godunov’s Method.” Journal of Computational Physics 32 (1): 101–136. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Seokkwan, and Jameson Antony. 1988. “Lower-Upper Symmetric-Gauss-Seidel Method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations.” AIAA Journal 26 (9): 1025–1026. doi: 10.2514/3.10007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar