Geometric continuity constraints of automatically derived parametrisations in CAD-based shape optimisation

References

• Andrés, E., P. Bitrián, M. Martin, and M. Widhalm. 2010. “Preliminary Comparison Between Two CAD-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Approaches Using Adjoint Methods for Fast Gradient Computation.” 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, EngOpt 2010, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Banovic, M., O. Mykhaskiv, S. Auriemma, A. Walther, H. Legrand, and J.-D. Müller. 2017. “Automatic Differentiation of the Open CASCADE Technology CAD System and Its Coupling with An Adjoint CFD Solver.” Optimization Methods and Software 33 (4–6): 813–28. doi: 10.1080/10556788.2018.1431235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, S. A., L. Talbot, and L. S. Yao. 1983. “Flow in Curved Pipes.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 15 (1): 461–512. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fl.15.010183.002333
   Google Scholar
• Brock, W. E., C. Burdyshaw, S. L. Karman, V. C. Betro, B. Hilbert, W. K. Anderson, and R. Haimes. 2012. “Adjoint-based Design Optimization Using CAD Parameterization Through CAPRI.” 50th AIAA Aerosp. Sc. Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, L. V., and T. A. Davis. 2013. “Algorithm 933: Reliable Calculation of Numerical Rank, Null Space Bases, Pseudoinverse Solutions, and Basic Solutions Using SuitesparseQR.” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 40 (1): 7. doi: 10.1145/2513109.2513116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, D. M., D. W. Zingg, and R. Haimes. 2005. “A CAD-Free and a CAD-Based Geometry Control System for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” AIAA CP 05-0451.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M. B., M. C. Duta, J.-D Müller, and N. A. Pierce. 2003. “Algorithm Developments for Discrete Adjoint Methods.” AIAA Journal 41 (2): 198–205. doi: 10.2514/2.1961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, M. B., and N. A. Pierce. 2000. “An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 65: 393–415. Also Oxford University Computing Laboratory NA report 00/04. doi: 10.1023/A:1011430410075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hascoët, L., and V. Pascual. 2004. TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide. Technical Report 0300. INRIA. http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rt-0300.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, R. M., and P. A. Henne. 1978. “Wing Design by Numerical Optimization.” Journal of Aircraft 15: 407–412. doi: 10.2514/3.58379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, S., and O. Amoignon. 2007. “Mesh Deformation Using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” Computers and Fluids 36 (6): 1119–1136. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793006001320. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, A. 1988. “Aerodynamic Design Via Control Theory.” Journal of Scientific Computing 3: 233–260. doi: 10.1007/BF01061285
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, A., and A. Vassberg. 2000. “Studies of Alternative Numerical Optimization Methods Applied to the Brachistochrone Problem.” Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal 9 (3): 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A., and J.-D. Müller. 2008. “Toward Modular Multigrid Design Optimisation.” In Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, edited by C. Bischof and J. Utke, Vol. 64, 281–291. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., F. Christakopoulos, and J.-D. Müller. 2011. “Preparation and Assembly of Adjoint CFD Codes.” Computers and Fluids 46 (1): 282–286. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, M. J., E. Andrés, M. Widhalm, P. Bitrián, and C. Lozano. 2012. “Non-uniform Rational B-splines-based Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization with the DLR TAU Code.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 226 (10): 1225–1242. doi: 10.1177/0954410011421704
   Google Scholar
• Masters, D. A., N. J. Taylor, T. Rendall, C. B. Allen, and D. J. Poole. 2017. “A Geometric Comparison of Aerofoil Shape Parameterisation Methods.” AIAA Journal 55 (5): 1575–1589. doi: 10.2514/1.J054943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, A., P. Castonguay, and S. Nadarajah. 2007. “Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques and its Effect on Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Shape Optimization.” 18th AIAA CFD conference, AIAA CP–2007–3837.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-D., O. Mykhaskiv, and J. Hückelheim. 2018. “STAMPS: a Finite-Volume Solver Framework for Adjoint Codes Derived with Source-Transformation AD.” 2018 Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference AIAA-CP 2928–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Myhkaskiv, O. 2019. “Optimal Shape Design with Automatically Differentiated CAD Parametrisations.” PhD diss., Queen Mary University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Mykhaskiv, O., M. Banovic, S. Auriemma, A. Walther, and J.-D. Mueller. 2018. “NURBS-based and Parametric-based Shape Optimisation with Differentiated CAD Kernel.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 15 (6): 916–926. doi: 10.1080/16864360.2018.1462881
   Google Scholar
• Mykhaskiv, O., P. Mohanamuraly, and J.-D. Müller. 2017. “CAD-Based Shape Optimisation of the NASA CRM Wing-Body Intersection Using Differentiated CAD-Kernel.” In 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, paper number: AIAA 2017-4080.
   Google Scholar
• Piegl, L., and W. Tiller. 2012. The NURBS Book. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Pironneau, O. 1974. “On Optimum Design in Fluid Mechanics.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 64: 97–110. doi: 10.1017/S0022112074002023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. T., C. G. Armstrong, H. S. Chua, C. Othmer, and T. Grahs. 2012. “Optimizing Parameterized CAD Geometries Using Sensitivities Based on Adjoint Functions.” Computer-Aided Design & Applications 9 (3): 253–268. doi: 10.3722/cadaps.2012.253-268
   Google Scholar
• Samareh, J. A. 2001. “Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques for High-Fidelity Multidisciplinary Shape Optimization.” AIAA Journal 39 (5): 877–884. doi: 10.2514/2.1391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samareh, J. A. 2004. “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Free-form Deformation.” AIAA Paper 4630: 1–13. doi:10.2514/6.2004-4630.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., and V. Schulz. 2009. “Impulse Response Approximations of Discrete Shape Hessians with Application in CFD.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 48 (4): 2562–80. doi: 10.1137/080719844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahpar, S. 2011. “Challenges to Overcome for Routine Usage of Automatic Optimisation in the Propulsion Industry.” The Aeronautical Journal 115 (1172): 615–25. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000006308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, G. 2006. Linear Algebra and Its Applications. Belmont, CA: Thomson, Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraete, T., F. Coletti, J. Bulle, T. Vanderwielen, and T. Arts. 2013. “Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels Part I: Numerical Method.” Journal of Turbomachinery 135 (5): 051015. doi: 10.1115/1.4023030
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S., W. Jahn, and J.-D. Müller. 2013. “CAD-based Shape Optimisation with CFD Using a Discrete Adjoint.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 74 (3): 153–68. doi: 10.1002/fld.3844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., D. Radford, M. Meyer, and J.-D. Müller. 2015. “CAD-based adjoint shape optimisation of a one-stage turbine with geometric constraints.” ASME Turbo Expo 2015, June. GT2015-42237.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., R. Jesudasan, and J.-D. Müller. 2019. “Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Optimisation of Wing Shape Using Non-uniform Rational B-Splines.” Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, Vol. 49, 143–158. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Y. Wang, M. Gugala, and J.-D. Müller. 2016. “Geometric Continuity Constraints for Adjacent NURBS Patches in Shape Optimisation.” Proceedings of VII European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS Congress 2016).
   Google Scholar