Parallel Immersed Boundary Method for Two-Phase Flows on DCU Clusters

References

• Amaya-Bower, L., and T. Lee. 2010. “Single Bubble Rising Dynamics for Moderate Reynolds Number Using Lattice Boltzmann Method.” Computers & Fluids 39 (7): 1191–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, J., D. F. Puleri, P. Balogh, J. Gounley, E. W. Draeger, and A. Randles. 2020. “Multi-GPU Immersed Boundary Method Hemodynamics Simulations.” Journal of Computational Science 44: 101153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bény, J., C. Kotsalos, and J. Latt. 2019. “Toward Full GPU Implementation of Fluid–Structure Interaction.” In 2019 18th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaga, D., and M. Weber. 1981. “Bubbles in Viscous Liquids: Shapes, Wakes and Velocities.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 105: 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsch, M., and L. Kobbelt. 2004. “A Remeshing Approach to Multiresolution Modeling.” In Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM Siggraph Symposium on Geometry Processing, 185–192.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. H., and C. A. Lin. 2023. “Multigrid Accelerated Projection Method on GPU Cluster for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows.” Journal of Mechanics 39: 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorin, A. J. 1968. “Numerical Solution of the Navier–Stokes Equations.” Mathematics of Computation 22 (104): 745–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, R., K. Felzien, and I. Senocak. 2012. “Toward a GPU-Accelerated Immersed Boundary Method for Wind Forecasting Over Complex Terrain.” In Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Vol. 44755. 1385–1394.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, R. P. 1961. “A Relaxation Method for Solving Elliptic Difference Equations.” Zhurnal Vychislitel'noi Matematiki I Matematicheskoi Fiziki 1 (5): 922–927.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, H., Y. Li, J. Shin, H.-k. Song, and J. Kim. 2013. “Effect of Confinement on Droplet Deformation in Shear Flow.” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 27 (8–10): 317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, J., J. F. Stene, and P. Lin. 2008. “Numerical Simulation of 3D Bubbles Rising in Viscous Liquids Using a Front Tracking Method.” Journal of Computational Physics 227 (6): 3358–3382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D., J. Thibault, and I. Senocak. 2010. “An MPI-CUDA Implementation for Massively Parallel Incompressible Flow Computations on Multi-GPU Clusters.” In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 522.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, J., X. Lin, F. Lin, and Y. Liu. 2024. “DCU-CHK: Checkpointing for Large-Scale CPU-DCU Heterogeneous Computing Systems.” CCF Transactions on High Performance Computing 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, J., H. Yu, Z. Tian, and H. Li. 2020. “Hybrid MPI and CUDA Parallelization for CFD Applications on Multi-GPU HPC Clusters.” Scientific Programming 2020: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., E. Jung, W. Lee, H. G. Lee, and J. Kim. 2012. “Volume Preserving Immersed Boundary Methods for Two-Phase Fluid Flows.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 69 (4): 842–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., A. Yun, D. Lee, J. Shin, D. Jeong, and J. Kim. 2013. “Three-Dimensional Volume-Conserving Immersed Boundary Model for Two-Phase Fluid Flows.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 257: 36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minale, M. 2008. “A Phenomenological Model for Wall Effects on the Deformation of An Ellipsoidal Drop in Viscous Flow.” Rheologica Acta 47: 667–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, N. J., and A. Goza. 2022. “A Strongly Coupled Immersed Boundary Method for Fluid–structure Interaction that Mimics the Efficiency of Stationary Body Methods.” Journal of Computational Physics 454: 110897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima, K. 2002. “Parallel Multilevel Iterative Linear Solvers with Unstructured Adaptive Grids for Simulations in Earth Science.” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 14 (6–7): 483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima, K. 2012. “OpenMP/MPI Hybrid Parallel Multigrid Method on fujitsu FX10 Supercomputer System.” In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing Workshops, 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T., P. Castonguay, and E. Laurendeau. 2019. “GPU Parallelization of Multigrid RANS Solver for Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Simulations on Multiblock Grids.” The Journal of Supercomputing 75: 2562–2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, P. O. 2006. “Mesh Size Functions for Implicit Geometries and PDE-based Gradient Limiting.” Engineering with Computers 22: 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, P. O., and G. Strang. 2004. “A Simple Mesh Generator in MATLAB.” SIAM Review 46 (2): 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskin, C. S. 1972. “Flow Patterns Around Heart Valves: A Numerical Method.” Journal of Computational Physics 10 (2): 252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskin, C. S., and D. M. McQueen. 1995. “A General Method for the Computer Simulation of Biological Systems Interacting with Fluids.” In Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, Vol. 49. 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, A., P. M. Khan, M. I. Alam, A. Prakash, and S. Roy. 2023. “A GPU-accelerated Sharp Interface Immersed Boundary Method for Versatile Geometries.” Journal of Computational Physics 478: 111985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. I. 1934. “The Formation of Emulsions in Definable Fields of Flow.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 146 (858): 501–523.
   Google Scholar
• Tutkun, B., and F. O. Edis. 2017. “An Implementation of the Direct-Forcing Immersed Boundary Method Using GPU Power.” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 11 (1): 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unverdi, S. O., and G. Tryggvason. 1992. “A Front-Tracking Method for Viscous, Incompressible, Multi-Fluid Flows.” Journal of Computational Physics 100 (1): 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero-Lara, P. 2014. “Accelerating Solid–fluid Interaction Based on the Immersed Boundary Method on Multicore and GPU Architectures.” The Journal of Supercomputing 70 (2): 799–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero-Lara, P., A. Pinelli, and M. Prieto-Matias. 2014. “Accelerating Solid-Fluid Interaction Using Lattice-Boltzmann and Immersed Boundary Coupled Simulations on Heterogeneous Platforms.” Procedia Computer Science 29: 50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Vananroye, A., P. Van Puyvelde, and P. Moldenaers. 2007. “Effect of Confinement on the Steady-State Behavior of Single Droplets During Shear Flow.” Journal of Rheology 51 (1): 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzicco, R. 2023. “Immersed Boundary Methods: Historical Perspective and Future Outlook.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 55: 129–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., and M. K. Gobbert. 2009. Performance Comparison Between Blocking and Non-Blocking Communications for a Three-Dimensional Poisson Problem. Baltimore: UMBC Faculty Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., D. M. Yan, X. Liu, C. Tang, J. Guo, X. Zhang, and P. Wonka. 2018. “Isotropic Surface Remeshing Without Large and Small Angles.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25 (7): 2430–2442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., X. Zhang, Z. Li, and G. W. He. 2009. “A Smoothing Technique for Discrete Delta Functions with Application to Immersed Boundary Method in Moving Boundary Simulations.” Journal of Computational Physics 228 (20): 7821–7836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., P. Sun, and F. Ming. 2015. “An SPH Modeling of Bubble Rising and Coalescing in Three Dimensions.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 294: 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar