Co-Clustering of Ordinal Data via Latent Continuous Random Variables and Not Missing at Random Entries

References

• Agresti, A. (2010), Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data (Vol. 656), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, P. S., Iovleff, S., and Govaert, G. (2017), “blockcluster: An R Package for Model-Based Co-Clustering,” Journal of Statistical Software, 76, 1–24. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v076.i09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (2000), “Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering With the Integrated Completed Likelihood,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 7, 719–725. DOI: 10.1109/34.865189.
   Google Scholar
• Biernacki, C., and Jacques, J. (2016), “Model-Based Clustering of Multivariate Ordinal Data Relying on a Stochastic Binary Search Algorithm,” Statistics and Computing, 26, 929–943. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-015-9585-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. (2006), Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Information Science and Statistics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bouveyron, C., Bozzi, L., Jacques, J., and Jollois, F.-X. (2018), “The Functional Latent Block Model for the Co-Clustering of Electricity Consumption Curves,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 67, 897–915. DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (1991), “A Classification EM Algorithm for Clustering and Two Stochastic Versions,” Computational Statistics Quarterly, 2, 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Côme, E., and Latouche, P. (2015), “Model Selection and Clustering in Stochastic Block Models Based on the Exact Integrated Complete Data Likelihood,” Statistical Modelling, 15, 564–589. DOI: 10.1177/1471082X15577017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Elia, A., and Piccolo, D. (2005), “A Mixture Model for Preferences Data Analysis,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 49, 917–934. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, W., Firtle, N. C., and Madden, T. C. (1990), “Marketing Research in a Marketing Environment,” Technical Report, IRWIN.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, D., Arnold, R., and Pledger, S. (2016), “Mixture-Based Clustering for the Ordered Stereotype Model,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 93, 46–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilula, Z., McCulloch, R., Ritov, Y., and Urminsky, O. (2018), “A Study Into Mechanisms of Attitudinal Scale Conversion: A Randomized Stochastic Ordering Approach,” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 17, 325–357. DOI: 10.1007/s11129-019-09209-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordan, M., and Diana, G. (2011), “A Clustering Method for Categorical Ordinal Data,” Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 40, 1315–1334. DOI: 10.1080/03610920903581010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley, I. C., and Murphy, T. B. (2010), “A Mixture of Experts Latent Position Cluster Model for Social Network Data,” Statistical Methodology, 7, 385–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2010.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Gouget, C. (2006), “Utilisation des modèles de mélange pour la classification automatique de données ordinales,” Ph.D. thesis, Compiègne.
   Google Scholar
• Govaert, G., and Nadif, M. (2008), “Block Clustering With Bernoulli Mixture Models: Comparison of Different Approaches,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 3233–3245. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaert, G., and Nadif, M. (2010), “Latent Block Model for Contingency Table,” Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 39, 416–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, J., and Biernacki, C. (2018), “Model-Based Co-Clustering for Ordinal Data,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 123, 101–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jollois, F.-X., and Nadif, M. (2009), “Classification de données ordinales: modèles et algorithms,” in 41èmes Journées de Statistique, Bordeaux: SFdS.
   Google Scholar
• Keribin, C., Brault, V., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (2012), “Model Selection for the Binary Latent Block Model,” in Proceedings of COMPSTAT (Vol. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Keribin, C., Brault, V., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (2015), “Estimation and Selection for the Latent Block Model on Categorical Data,” Statistics and Computing, 25, 1201–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keribin, C., Celeux, G., and Valérie, R. (2017), “The Latent Block Model: A Useful Model for High Dimensional Data,” in ISI 2017-61st World Statistics Congress, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J., and Rubin, D. B. (2014), Statistical Analysis With Missing Data (Vol. 333), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lomet, A. (2012), “Sélection de Modèle pour la Classification Croisée de Données Continues,” Ph.D. thesis, Compiègne.
   Google Scholar
• Matechou, E., Liu, I., Fernández, D., Farias, M., and Gjelsvik, B. (2016), “Biclustering Models for Two-Mode Ordinal Data,” Psychometrika, 81, 611–624. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9503-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McParland, D., and Gormley, I. C. (2016), “Model Based Clustering for Mixed Data: clustmd,” Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 10, 155–169. DOI: 10.1007/s11634-016-0238-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podani, J. (2006), “Braun-Blanquet’s Legacy and Data Analysis in Vegetation Science,” Journal of Vegetation Science, 17, 113–117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02429.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranalli, M., and Rocci, R. (2016), “Mixture Models for Ordinal Data: A Pairwise Likelihood Approach,” Statistics and Computing, 26, 529–547. DOI: 10.1007/s11222-014-9543-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand, W. M. (1971), “Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 846–850. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocci, R., and Vichi, M. (2008), “Two-Mode Multi-Partitioning,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 1984–2003. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.06.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176344136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrucca, L. (2016), “Genetic Algorithms for Subset Selection in Model-Based Clustering,” in Unsupervised Learning Algorithms, eds. M. Celebi and K. Aydin, Cham: Springer, pp. 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Vichi, M. (2001), “Double k-Means Clustering for Simultaneous Classification of Objects and Variables,” in Advances in Classification and Data Analysis, eds. S. Borra, R. Rocci, M. Vichi, and M. Schader, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, J., Friel, N., and Latouche, P. (2017), “Inferring Structure in Bipartite Networks Using the Latent Blockmodel and Exact ICL,” Network Science, 5, 45–69. DOI: 10.1017/nws.2016.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar