Testing Biased Randomization Assumptions and Quantifying Imperfect Matching and Residual Confounding in Matched Observational Studies

References

• Austin, P. C., and Stuart, E. A. (2015), “Moving Towards Best Practice When Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Using the Propensity Score to Estimate Causal Treatment Effects in Observational Studies.” Statistics in Medicine, 34, 3661–3679. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bind, M.-A. C., and Rubin, D. B. (2019), “Bridging Observational Studies and Randomized Experiments by Embedding the Former in the Latter.” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 28, 1958–1978. DOI: 10.1177/0962280217740609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, Z. (2020), “Randomization Tests to Assess Covariate Balance When Designing and Analyzing Matched Datasets.” Observational Studies, 7, 1–36. DOI: 10.1353/obs.2021.0031.
   Google Scholar
• Branson, Z., and Keele, L. (2020), “Evaluating a Key Instrumental Variable Assumption Using Randomization Tests.” American Journal of Epidemiology, 189, 1412–1420. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, A. F., McCaffree, D. R., and Gray, B. A. (1983), “Evaluation of Right-Heart Catheterization in the Critically Ill Patient Without Acute Myocardial Infarction.” New England Journal of Medicine, 308, 263–267. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198302033080508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, A. F., Speroff, T., Dawson, N. V., Thomas, C., Harrell, F. E., Wagner, D., Desbiens, N., Goldman, L., Wu, A. W., Califf, R. M. (1996), “The Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically Ill Patients.” JAMA, 276, 889–897. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540110043030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehejia, R. H., and Wahba, S. (2002), “Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151–161. DOI: 10.1162/003465302317331982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Denby, L., and Landwehr, J. (2013), “A Conversation with Colin L. Mallows.” International Statistical Review, 81, 338–360. DOI: 10.1111/insr.12038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, A., and Sekhon, J. S. (2013), “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 932–945. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., and Gangl, M. (2004), “Assessing Bias in the Estimation of Causal Effects: Rosenbaum Bounds on Matching Estimators and Instrumental Variables Estimation with Imperfect Instruments.” Sociological Methodology, 34, 271–310. DOI: 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00154.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty, C. B. (2020), “Studentized Sensitivity Analysis for the Sample Average Treatment Effect in Paired Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115, 1518–1530. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1632072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. M., Rassen, J. A., Ackermann, D., Bartels, D. B., and Schneeweiss, S. (2014), “Metrics for Covariate Balance in Cohort Studies of Causal Effects.” Statistics in Medicine, 33, 1685–1699. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon-Bartsch, J., and Shem-Tov, Y. (2019), “The Classification Permutation Test: A Flexible Approach to Testing for Covariate Imbalance in Observational Studies.” Annals of Applied Statistics, 13, 1464–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G. (1991), “A Randomized Control Trial of Right-Heart Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients.” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 6, 91–95. DOI: 10.1177/088506669100600204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, B. B., Rosenbaum, P. R., and Small, D. S. (2014), “Clustered Treatment Assignments and Sensitivity to Unmeasured Biases in Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109, 133–144. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.863157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, R., Rosenbaum, P. R., and Small, D. S. (2010), “Using the Cross-Match Test to Appraise Covariate Balance in Matched Pairs.” The American Statistician, 64, 299–309. DOI: 10.1198/tast.2010.09210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, S., Kang, H., Small, D. S., and Fogarty, C. B. (2021), “Increasing Power for Observational Studies of Aberrant Response: An Adaptive Approach.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 83, 482–504. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12424.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., and Stuart, E. A. (2007), “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric causal Inference.” Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpl013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacus, S. M., King, G., and Porro, G. (2011), “Multivariate Matching Methods that are Monotonic Imbalance Bounding.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 345–361. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, L. J. (2014), rbounds: Perform Rosenbaum Bounds Sensitivity Tests for Matched and Unmatched Data. R package version 2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, S. D. (2022), rcbsubset: Optimal Subset Matching with Refined Covariate Balance. R package version 1.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, S. D., Kelz, R. R., Silber, J. H., and Rosenbaum, P. R. (2015), “Large, Sparse Optimal Matching with Refined Covariate Balance in an Observational Study of the Health Outcomes Produced by New Surgeons.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110, 515–527. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.997879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989), “Optimal Matching for Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1024–1032. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002), Observational Studies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005), “An Exact Distribution-Free Test Comparing Two Multivariate Distributions Based on Adjacency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 67, 515–530.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010), Design of Observational Studies. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2012), “Optimal Matching of an Optimally Chosen Subset in Observational Studies.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 21, 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., Ross, R. N., and Silber, J. H. (2007), “Minimum Distance Matched Sampling with Fine Balance in an Observational Study of Treatment for Ovarian Cancer.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 75–83. DOI: 10.1198/016214506000001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1985), “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity Score.” The American Statistician, 39, 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1979), “Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 318–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (2007), “The Design Versus the Analysis of Observational Studies for Causal Effects: Parallels with the Design of Randomized Trials.” Statistics in Medicine, 26, 20–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber, J. H., Rosenbaum, P. R., Trudeau, M. E., Even-Shoshan, O., Chen, W., Zhang, X., and Mosher, R. E. (2001), “Multivariate Matching and Bias Reduction in the Surgical Outcomes Study.” Medical Care, 39, 1048–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. (2010), “Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward.” Statistical Science, 25, 1–21. DOI: 10.1214/09-STS313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, K., Cardie, C., Rogers, S., and Schroedl, S. (2001), “Constrained k-Means Clustering with Background Knowledge.” In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Vol. 1, 577–584.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and Ding, P. (2020), “Randomization Tests for Weak Null Hypotheses in Randomized Experiments.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 1898–1913. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1750415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. (2021), match2C: Match One Sample using Two Criteria. R package version 1.1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B. (2022), “Towards Better Reconciling Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Study Findings: Efficient Algorithms for Building Representative Matched Samples with Enhanced External Validity.”
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Heng, S., Mackay, E. J., and Ye, T. (2021a), “Bridging Preference-Based Instrumental Variable Studies and Cluster-Randomized Encouragement Experiments: Study Design, Noncompliance, and Average Cluster Effect Ratio.” Biometrics. DOI: 10.1111/biom.13500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Mackay, E. J., and Baiocchi, M. (2022), “Statistical Matching and Subclassification with a Continuous Dose: Characterization, Algorithm, and Application to a Health Outcomes Study.” Annals of Applied Statistics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Small, D., Lasater, K., McHugh, M., Silber, J., and Rosenbaum, P. (2021b), “Matching One Sample According to Two Criteria in Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1–34. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1981337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q. (2018), “On Sensitivity Value of Pair-Matched Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114, 713–722. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1429277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta, J. R. (2012), “Using Mixed Integer Programming for Matching in an Observational Study of Kidney Failure After Surgery.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107, 1360–1371. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2012.703874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar