Dynamic prediction using landmark historical functional Cox regression

References

• Abrahamowicz, M., Bartlett, G., Tamblyn, R. and du Berger, R. (2006), ‘Modeling cumulative dose and exposure duration provided insights regarding the associations between benzodiazepines and injuries’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59(4), 393–403.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Cain, K. C. and Gelber, R. D. (1983), ‘Analysis of survival by tumor response.’, Journal of Clinical Oncology 1(11), 710–719.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., Groll, A. and Scheipl, F. (2018), ‘A generalized additive model approach to time-to-event analysis’, Statistical Modelling 18(3-4), 299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, A., Scheipl, F., Hartl, W., Day, A. G. and Küchenhoff, H. (2018), ‘Penalized estimation of complex, non-linear exposure-lag-response associations’, Biostatistics 20(2), 315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Blattenberger, G. and Lad, F. (1985), ‘Separating the brier score into calibration and refinement components: A graphical exposition’, The American Statistician 39(1), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1972), ‘Regression models and life-tables’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34(2), 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, P. H. and Marx, B. D. (1996), ‘Flexible smoothing with b-splines and penalties’, Statistical Science 11(2), 89–121.
   Google Scholar
• Faucett, C. L. and Thomas, D. C. (1996), ‘Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: A gibbs sampling approach’, Statistics in Medicine 15(15), 1663–1685.
   Google Scholar
• Gasparrini, A., Scheipl, F., Armstrong, B. and Kenward, M. G. (2017), ‘A penalized framework for distributed lag non-linear models’, Biometrics 73(3), 938–948.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., Bobb, J., Crainiceanu, C. M., Caffo, B. and Reich, D. (2011), ‘Penalized functional regression’, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 20(4), 830–851.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., Scheipl, F., Huang, L., Wrobel, J., Gellar, J., Harezlak, J., McLean, M. W., Swihart, B., Xiao, L., Crainiceanu, C. and Reiss, P. T. (2016), refund: Regression with Functional Data. R package version 0.1-16. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=refund
   Google Scholar
• Greven, S. and Scheipl, F. (2017), ‘A general framework for functional regression modelling’, Statistical Modelling 17(1-2), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Heagerty, P. J. and Zheng, Y. (2005), ‘Survival model predictive accuracy and roc curves’, Biometrics 61(1), 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanescu, A. E., Staicu, A.-M., Scheipl, F. and Greven, S. (2015), ‘Penalized function-on-function regression’, Computational Statistics 30(2), 539–568.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, J. (2019), Statistical Methods in Applications with Complex Data Structures, PhD thesis, The Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, A., Xiao, L., Crainiceanu, C. and Checkley, W. (2018), ‘Dynamic prediction in functional concurrent regression with an application to child growth’, Statistics in Medicine 37(8), 1376–1388.
   Google Scholar
• Mauff, K., Steyerberg, E. W., Nijpels, G., van der Heijden, A. A. and Rizopoulos, D. (2017), ‘Extension of the association structure in joint models to include weighted cumulative effects’, Statistics in Medicine 36(23), 3746–3759.
   Google Scholar
• Maziarz, M., Heagerty, P., Cai, T. and Zheng, Y. (2017), ‘On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options’, Biometrics 73(1), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. and R Core Team (2020), nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-148. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2017), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. (2010), ‘JM: An R package for the joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data’, Journal of Statistical Software 35(9), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D. (2016), ‘The R package JMbayes for fitting joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data using mcmc’, Journal of Statistical Software 72(7), 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos, D., Molenberghs, G. and Lesaffre, E. M. (2017), ‘Dynamic predictions with time-dependent covariates in survival analysis using joint modeling and landmarking’, Biometrical Journal 59(6), 1261–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, D., Wand, M. and Carroll, R. (2003), Semiparametric regression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Scheipl, F., Staicu, A. M. and Greven, S. (2015), ‘Functional Additive Mixed Models’, J Comput Graph Stat 24(2), 477–501.
   Google Scholar
• Schoop, R., Graf, E. and Schumacher, M. (2008), ‘Quantifying the predictive performance of prognostic models for censored survival data with time-dependent covariates’, Biometrics 64(2), 603–610.
   Google Scholar
• Schoop, R., Schumacher, M. and Graf, E. (2011), ‘Measures of prediction error for survival data with longitudinal covariates’, Biometrical Journal 53(2), 275–293.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, E. M., Shinohara, R. T., Dewey, B. E., Schindler, M. K., Muschelli, J., Reich, D. S., Crainiceanu, C. M. and Eloyan, A. (2016), ‘Relating multi-sequence longitudinal intensity profiles and clinical covariates in incident multiple sclerosis lesions’, NeuroImage: Clinical 10, 1 – 17.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvestre, M.-P. and Abrahamowicz, M. (2009), ‘Flexible modeling of the cumulative effects of time-dependent exposures on the hazard’, Statistics in Medicine 28(27), 3437–3453.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiatis, A. A., DeGruttola, V. and Wulfsohn, M. S. (1995), ‘Modeling the relationship of survival to longitudinal data measured with error. applications to survival and cd4 counts in patients with aids’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(429), 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Vacek, P. M. (1997), ‘Assessing the effect of intensity when exposure varies over time’, Statistics in Medicine 16(5), 505–513.
   Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, H. C. (2007), ‘Dynamic prediction by landmarking in event history analysis.’, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 34(1), 70 – 85.
   Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, H. C. and Putter, H. (2011), Dynamic Prediction in Clinical Survival Analysis, Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2003), ‘Thin plate regression splines’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 65(1), 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2017), Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R, 2nd edn, CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N., Li, Z., Shaddick, G. and Augustin, N. H. (2017), ‘Generalized additive models for gigadata: Modeling the u.k. black smoke network daily data’, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N., Pya, N. and Säfken, B. (2016), ‘Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 111(516), 1548–1563.
   Google Scholar
• Wulfsohn, M. S. and Tsiatis, A. A. (1997), ‘A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error’, Biometrics 53(1), 330–339.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, L., Zipunnikov, V., Ruppert, D. and Crainiceanu, C. (2016), ‘Fast covariance estimation for high-dimensional functional data’, Statistics and Computing 26(1), 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y. and Heagerty, P. J. (2005), ‘Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data’, Biometrics 61(2), 379–391.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Huang, X. and Li, L. (2020), ‘Dynamic prediction of time to a clinical event with sparse and irregularly measured longitudinal biomarkers’, Biometrical Journal.
   Google Scholar