Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

References

• Albert, J. H. and Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(422):669–679.
   Google Scholar
• Bonato, V., Baladandayuthapani, V., Broom, B. M., Sulman, E. P., Aldape, K. D., and Do, K.-A. (2011). Bayesian ensemble methods for survival prediction in gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 27(3):359–367.
   Google Scholar
• Burgette, L. F. and Nordheim, E. V. (2012). The Trace Restriction: An Alternative Identification Strategy for the Bayesian Multinomial Probit Model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(3):404–410.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, H. A., George, E. I., and McCulloch, R. E. (1998). Bayesian CART Model Search. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(443):935–948.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, H. A., George, E. I., and McCulloch, R. E. (2010). BART: Bayesian additive regression trees. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1):266–298.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. M., McLees, M. P., Steiner, J. F., Del Rio, C., and Burman, W. J. (2011). The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 52(6):793–800.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, N. C., Louis, T. A., and Rosner, Gary L andVaradhan, R. (2020). Individualized treatment effects with censored data via fully nonparametric Bayesian accelerated failure time models. Biostatistics, 21(1):50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, K. and van Dyk, D. A. (2005). A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model using marginal data augmentation. Journal of Econometrics, pages 311 – 334.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J. D. and Schafer, J. L. (2007). Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science, pages 523–539.
   Google Scholar
• Kindo, B. P., Wang, H., and Peña, E. A. (2016). Multinomial probit Bayesian additive regression trees. Stat (International Statistical Institute), 5(1):119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Genberg, B. L., Nyambura, M., Hogan, J., Braitstein, P., and Sang, E. (2017). State-Space Models for Engagement, Retention, and Reentry in the HIV Care Cascade. CROI Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Linero, A. R., Basak, P., Li, Y., and Sinha, D. (2021). Bayesian survival tree ensembles with submodel shrinkage. Bayesian Analysis, 1(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S. (1994a). The Collapsed Gibbs Sampler in Bayesian Computations with Applications to a Gene Regulation Problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427):958–966.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S. (1994b). Fraction of Missing Information and Convergence Rate of Data Augmentation. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Wong, W. H., and Kong, A. (1994). Covariance Structure of the Gibbs Sampler with Applications to the Comparisons of Estimators and Augmentation Schemes. Biometrika, 81(1):27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S. and Wu, Y. N. (1999). Parameter Expansion for Data Augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448):1264–1274.
   Google Scholar
• Low-Kam, C., Telesca, D., Ji, Z., Zhang, H., Xia, T., Zink, J. I., and Nel, A. E. (2015). A Bayesian regression tree approach to identify the effect of nanoparticles’ properties on toxicity profiles. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1):383–401. Publisher: Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, R. and Rossi, P. (1994). An exact likelihood analysis of the multinomial probit model. Journal of Econometrics, 64(1-2):207–240.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, R. E., Polson, N. G., and Rossi, P. E. (2000). A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model with fully identified parameters. Journal of Econometrics, 99(1):173–193.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, X.-L. and Van Dyk, D. A. (1999). Seeking Efficient Data Augmentation Schemes via Conditional and Marginal Augmentation. Biometrika, 86(2):301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. S. (2020). Log-Linear Bayesian Additive Regression Trees for Multinomial Logistic and Count Regression Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(534).
   Google Scholar
• Nobile, A. (1998). A hybrid Markov chain for the Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model. Statistics and Computing, 8(3):229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Pratola, M. T. (2016). Efficient Metropolis–Hastings proposal mechanisms for Bayesian regression tree models. Bayesian Analysis, 11(3):885–911.
   Google Scholar
• Sparapani, R., Spanbauer, C., and McCulloch, R. (2021). Nonparametric machine learning and efficient computation with bayesian additive regression trees: the bart r package. Journal of Statistical Software, 97:1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sparapani, R. A., Logan, B. R., McCulloch, R. E., and Laud, P. W. (2016). Nonparametric survival analysis using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART). Statistics in Medicine, 35(16):2741–2753.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, M. A. and Wong, W. H. (1987). The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398):528–540.
   Google Scholar
• Um, S., Linero, A. R., and Sinha, Debajyoti andBandyopadhyay, D. (2022). Bayesian additive regression trees for multivariate skewed responses. Statistics in Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyk, D. and Meng, X.-L. (2001). The Art of Data Augmentation. The Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10:1–111.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyk, D. A. (2010). MARGINAL MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO METHODS. Statistica Sinica, 20(4):1423–1454.
   Google Scholar
• Waldmann, P. (2016). Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees. Genetics, Selection, Evolution: GSE, 48.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (2012). Meeting report on Framework for metrics to support effective treatment as prevention.
   Google Scholar