Curriculum-Based Measurement as a Predictor of Performance on a State Assessment: Diagnostic Efficiency of Local Norms

REFERENCES

• Allinder, R. M., Bolling, R., Oats, R., & Gagnon, W. (1998). An analysis of alternative means of measuring student achievement prior to a scheduled school break. Special Services in the Schools, 14, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Allinder, R. M., & Eccarius, M. A. (1999). Exploring the technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement in reading for children who use manually coded English. Exceptional Children, 65, 271–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Standard errors associated with progress monitoring outcomes from DIBELS, AIMSweb, and an experimental passage set. School Psychology Review, 38, 266–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barger, J. (2003). Comparing the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency indicator and the North Carolina end of grade reading assessment (Tech. Rep.). Asheville: North Carolina Teacher Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J., Muyskens, P., & Marston, D. (2006). Tracking the progress of students whose first language is not English towards English proficiency: Using CBM with English language learners. MinneTESOL/WITESOL Journal, 23, 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T. W., & Reschly, A. L. (2007). Progress monitoring in reading: Using Curriculum-Based Measurement in a response-to-intervention model. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., & Silberglitt, B. (2007). Estimates of the standard error of measurement for curriculum-based measures of oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 36, 130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, L., Tindal, G., & Stieber, S. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide achievement tests. Educational Assessment, 7, 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S., Reschly, A. L., Lembke, E, Magnussen, D., Callender, S., Windram, H., & Statchel, N. (2009). A school-wide model for progress monitoring. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., Busch, T. W., Shin, J., & Kruschwitz, R. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2007). Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests: Reading CRCT Content Descriptions. Atlanta, GA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2008a). 2007–2008 Report Card, Madison County. Atlanta, GA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2008b). Validity and Reliability of the 2008 Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests. Atlanta: Assessment Research and Development Division of the Georgia Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2009a). Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests: Score Interpretation Guide, Grades 1 through 8. Atlanta, GA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2009b). Georgia Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests: Test examiner's manual. Atlanta, GA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Georgia Department of Education. (2009c). 2009 Scale Scores and Cut Scores for the Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests. Atlanta: Assessment Research and Development Division of the Georgia Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goffreda, C. T., & DiPerna, J. C. (2010). An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills. School Psychology Review, 39, 463–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS™ Oral Reading Fluency Passages for First through Third Grades (Tech. Rep. No. 10). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance of decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., Kaminski, R. A., & Wallin, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Tech. Rep. No. 11). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Wallin, J., Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). System-wide Percentile Ranks for DIBELS Benchmark Assessment (Tech. Rep. No. 9). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in Grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34, 372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Towards a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller-Margulis, M. A., Shapiro, E. S., & Hintze, J. M. (2008). Long-term diagnostic accuracy of curriculum-based measures in reading and mathematics. School Psychology Review, 37, 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, S. R., McEvoy, M. A., & Priest, J. S. (2002). “Growing” measures for monitoring progress in early childhood education: A research and development process for Individual Growth and Development Indicators. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27(4), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (2004). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. K., & Bradley-Johnson, S. (1995). Technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement for Braille readers. School Psychology Review, 24, 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E., & Hess, F. M. (2005). Johnny can read … in some states: Assessing the rigor of state assessment systems. Education Next, 5, 52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. (2009). Curriculum-Based Measurement Oral Reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S. M., Hudson, R. F., & Torgesen, J. K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 343–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K. L. & Reschly, A. L. (2011). English learners: Challenges in assessment and the promise of curriculum-based measurement. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 144–154. doi: 10.1177/0741932510361260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, J. G., Santoro, L. E., & Hintze, J. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., & Shaw, D. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency-Based Indicators of Third Grade Reading Skills for Colorado State Assessment Program (CSAP) (Tech. Rep.). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., & Bamonto, S. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement: “Big ideas” and avoiding confusion. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced application of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, D., Biwer, D., & Hesch, A. (2001). Establishing curriculum-based measurement oral reading fluency performance standards to predict success on local and state tests of reading achievement. Unpublished data. Arlington Heights, IL: AHSD 25.
   Google Scholar
• Silberglitt, B., & Hintze, J. (2005). Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress towards success on state-mandated achievement tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 304–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A. & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. (2003). Diagnosing tests: Using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 8, 209–219.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Meer, C. D., Lentz, F. E., & Stollar, S. (2005). The relationship between oral reading fluency and Ohio proficiency testing in reading (Tech. Rep.). Eugene: University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2005). The relationship of Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Oral Reading Fluency to performance on Arizona Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS) (Research Brief). Tempe, AZ: Tempe School District No. 3 Assessment and Evaluation Department.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. E. (2006). Modeling the relationship between oral reading fluency and performance on a statewide reading test. Educational Assessment, 11, 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. (2009). Predicting performance on state achievement tests using curriculum-based measurement in reading: A multilevel meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932508327463
   Google Scholar