Measuring Reading Strategy Use

References

• Abedi, J., Leon, S., Wolf, M. K., & Farnsworth, T. (2008). Detecting test items differentially impacting in the performance of ELL students. In M. K. Wolf, J. L. Herman, J. Kim, J. Abedi, S. Leon, N. Griffin, … H. W. Shin CRESST Report 738 Eds., Providing validity evidence to improve the assessment of English language learners (pp. 55–75). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, N. J. (2001). On the lexile framework. In National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Assessing the lexile framework. Results on a panel meeting NCES 2001–08 (pp. 15–21). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), 1–23. doi:10.1177/0146621697211001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1982). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 249.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Meyer, J. L. (1991). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 393–416. doi:10.2307/747895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229–251. doi:10.1080/00313830050154485
   Google Scholar
• Artley, A. S. (1943). Teaching word meaning through context. The Elementary English Review, 20(1), 68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Arya, D., & Maul, A. (2016). The building of knowledge, language, and decision-making about climate change science: A cross-national program for secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, D. J., Harlow, D., Hansen, A. K., Harmon, L., McBeath, J., & Pulgar, J. (2017). Innovative youth: An engineering and literacy integrated approach. Science Scope, 40(9), 82–88. doi:10.2505/4/ss17_040_09_82
   Google Scholar
• Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 1, 353–394.
   Google Scholar
• Belfi, B., Goos, M., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2012). The effect of class composition by gender and ability on secondary school students’ school well-being and academic self-concept: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 7, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackowicz, C. Z., & Fisher, P. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. ML Kamil, PB.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, L. (1995). Unintended consequences of performance assessment: Issues of bias and fairness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 21–24. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00885.x
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (Third). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. doi:10.3102/0034654309359353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. C., & Wilson, M. (2003). An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(1), 87–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu, (Ed.), Reading Comprehension: from Research to Practice (pp. 49–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M., & Madden, A. (2010). The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 257. doi:10.1037/a0018212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F. (2004). Morphological processes that influence learning to read. In Stone, C. A., Silliman, E. R., Ehren, B. J., & Wallach, G. P. (Eds.) Handbook of Language and Literacy: Development and Disorders (pp. 318–339). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E., & Ogle, D. (1987). KWL Plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30(7), 626–631.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23. doi:10.1080/00220970209602054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, B. Y. (2013). Adolescents’ constructively responsive reading strategy use in a critical internet reading task. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 329–332. doi:10.1002/rrq.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Smith, E. (1980). Teaching the process of reading comprehension (Tech. Report No. 182.). Urbana: Illinois University, Center for the Study of Reading (ED 193 616).
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. B., Jr, & Curry, S. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. Reading Teacher, 43(3), 256–258.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 155–177. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9070-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Education Evaluation and Policy, 26(1), 1–22. doi:10.3102/01623737026001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitz, P., Jones, J., & Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 102–126. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2009). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 189(1–2), 107–122. doi:10.1177/0022057409189001-208
   Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., Arim, R., Law, D., Domene, J., Gagnon, F., & Lacroix, S. (2010). Application of think aloud protocols for examining and confirming sources of differential item functioning identified by expert reviews. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29(2), 24–35. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00173.x
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G. R., Alao, S., Anderson, E., & McCann, A. (1998). Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 261. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, J., & Stoller, F. L. (1998). Integrating strategic reading in L2 instruction. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(1), 251–269.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T. (1997). The strategic reading abilities and potential of five low-literacy Latina/o readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 224–243. doi:10.1598/RRQ.32.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67–97. doi:10.3102/00028312032001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, N. C. (1994). Developmental perspectives on reading disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 10(4), 297–311. doi:10.1080/1057356940100403
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement, 4th edition (pp. 17–64). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52(7), 738–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 69–98. doi:10.2307/3588097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucan, L., Palincsar, A. S., Busse, T., Heisey, N., Klingelhofer, R., Rimbey, M., & Schutz, K. (2011). Applying the Grossman et al. theoretical framework: The case of reading. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2897–2921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L., & Valencia, S. (1986). Reading assessment: Practice and theoretical perspectives. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lubliner, S., & Grisham, D. L. (2012). Cognate strategy instruction. In Learning from culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: Using inquiry to inform practice (pp. 105). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, J., Harlow, D., Arya, D., & Longtin, M. (in press). From becoming to being scientists: Developing STEM programming for girls using design-based implementation research approaches. Afterschool Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montelongo, J. A., Hernández, A. C., Herter, R. J., & Cuello, J. (2011). Using cognates to scaffold context clue strategies for Latino ELs. The Reading Teacher, 64(6), 429–434. doi:10.1598/RT.64.6.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2008). Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era on accountability. Teachers College Record, 110, 700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. (2009). An investigation of concept mapping to improve the reading comprehension of science texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 402–414. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9157-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., Pesko, E., & Hamlin, M. (2005). Attending to the nature of subject matter in text comprehension assessments. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 257–278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1989). Strategies for comprehending text and coping with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 32–42. doi:10.2307/1510250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., & Daniel, S. (2017). Toward contingency in scaffolding reading comprehension: Next steps for research. Reading Research Quarterly. doi:10.1002/rrq.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. A., & Flores, T. P. (1997). Novel techniques for visualizing biological information. ISMB, 5, 241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2017) TAM: Test analysis modules. CRAN. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R- project.org/package=TAM R package version 2.5-14
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, T. A. (2001). From the known to the unknown: Using cognates to teach English to Spanish-speaking literates. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 744–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41. doi:10.1177/074193250202300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, K., & Allen, D. D. (2015). Use of open‐source software for adaptive measurement: Concerto as an R‐based computer adaptive development and delivery platform. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68(3), 478–496. doi:10.1111/bmsp.2015.68.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6(1), 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., August, D., & White, C. E. (2011). Spanish-speaking students’ use of cognate knowledge to infer the meaning of English words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 243–255. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., & Soltero-González, L. (2011). Meaningful assessment in linguistically diverse classrooms. In Flores, B. B., Sheets, R. H., & Clark, E. R. (Eds.), Teacher Preparation for Bilingual Student Populations: Educar Para Transformar, 146–163. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Jacobson, M. G., Davis, C. E., & Davis, R. L. (1989). Prior knowledge and difficult vocabulary in the comprehension of unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 27–43. doi:10.2307/748009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. doi:10.3102/0034654316675417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., & Dionne, J. (2000). Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413–425. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. L. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26, 29–36. doi:10.1080/02783190309554236
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., Vevea, J. L., Camacho, F., Reeve, B. B., Rosa, K., & Nelson, L. (2001). Augmented scores—“Borrowing strength” to compute scores based on small numbers of items. In D. Thissen, H. Wainer, et al. (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 343–387). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). The impact of concept-oriented reading instruction on students’ reading motivation, reading engagement, and reading comprehension. In J. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook on schools, schooling, and human develop- ment (pp. 463–477). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. K., & Peters, C. W. (1987). Comprehension assessment: Implementing an interactive view of reading. Educational Psychologist, 22(3–4), 333–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., & Adams, R. J. (2013). Properties of Rasch residual fit statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 14, 339–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, M., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Haldane, S. A. (2007). ACER conquest 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar