Middle School Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment Practice Throughout a Year-long Professional Development Experience

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(2), 89–99. doi:10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, W. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1985). Decision-oriented educational research in school districts: The role of dissemination processes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 11(2), 183–203. doi:10.1016/0191-491X(85)90022-7
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7(2), 548–556.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636. doi:10.2307/2579746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 9(4), 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, Linda, Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dedoose Version 8.0.35. (2018). Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Frohbieter, G., Greenwald, E., Stecher, B., & Schwartz, H. (2011). Knowing and Doing: What Teachers Learn from Formative Assessment and How They Use the Information. CRESST Report 802. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2009). Formative assessment for secondary science teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (2014). Mental models. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausknecht, J. P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo, N. T., & Moriarty Gerrard, M. O. (2007). Retesting in selection: A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 373. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi:10.1002/tea.21004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for “data use” among teachers and school leaders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A socio-cultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4), 505–519. doi:10.1080/03054980600884227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons fromthree urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. A. (2010). Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behavior and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98–106. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. doi:10.1002/sce.20395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 608–644. doi:10.3102/0034654308324427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48(12), 1181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education: Evidence from recent RAND research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. F., Borko, H., Stecher, B., Luskin, R., & Kloser, M. (2012). Measuring classroom assessment practice using instructional artifacts: A validation study of the QAS notebook. Educational Assessment, 17(2–3), 107–131. doi:10.1080/10627197.2012.715513
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949. doi:10.1002/tea.3660271003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. doi:10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95(4), 627–638. doi:10.1002/sce.20438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. doi:10.3102/00346543062003307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 203–220. doi:10.1177/074171369204200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafanelli, S., Borko, H., Kloser, M., & Wilsey, M. (2018). From focusing on grades to exploring student thinking: A case study of change in assessment practice. In N Barnes & H. Fives (Eds.), Cases of Teachers’ Data Use (pp. 63–79). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 472–482. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569–600. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<569::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (1972). Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 225. doi:10.1037/h0032652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Davidson, K. L., & Bowman, R. (2011). How Middle-School Mathematics Teachers Use Interim and Benchmark Assessment Data. CRESST Report 807. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. doi:10.1111/emip.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, L., Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Rust, F. (2005). Assessment. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 275–326). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 419–435. doi:10.1002/tea.3660200506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., … Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359. doi:10.1080/08957340802347845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar