558
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Road to Retention Passes through First Year Academic Performance: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of Academic Performance and Persistence

, , , &

References

  • ACT. (2003). 2002-2003 ACT national curriculum survey® report. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2007a). ACT technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2007b). 2005-2006 ACT national curriculum survey® report. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2009). 2009 ACT national curriculum survey® report. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2010). The national collegiate retention and persistence to degree rates. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2013). ACT national curriculum survey® 2012: Policy implications on preparing for higher standards. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2016). ACT national curriculum survey® 2016. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • ACT. (2017). ACT technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • Allen, J., & Radunzel, J. (2017). Relating ACT Composite score to different levels of first-year college GPA (ACT Technical Brief). ACT, Inc. Iowa City, IA.
  • Allen, J., & Robbins, S. (2010). Effects of interest–major congruence, motivation, and academic performance on timely degree attainment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 23–35.
  • Allen, J., Robbins, S., Casillas, A., & Oh, I. (2008). Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness. Research in Higher Education, 49, 647–664. doi:10.1037/a0017267
  • Atkinson, R. C., & Geiser, S. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665–676. doi:10.3102/0013189X0935198
  • Beatty, A. S., Walmsley, P. T., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Koch, A. J. (2015). The reliability of college grades. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 31–40. doi:10.1111/emip.12096
  • Braxton, J. M., Doyle, W. R., Hartley, H. V., III, Hirschy, A. S., Jones, W. A., & McLendon, M. K. (2013). Rethinking college student retention. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Brown, K. G., Le, H., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), 87–100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00336.x
  • Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Castaneda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 123–139. doi:10.1080/00221546.1993.11778419
  • Cabrera, A. F., Stampen, J. O., & Hansen, W. L. (1990). Exploring the effects of ability to pay on persistence in college. The Review of Higher Education, 13(3), 303–336.
  • Card, D. (1999). The causal effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1801–1863). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
  • Carnevale, A. P., Rose, S. J., & Cheah, B. (2011). The college payoff: Education, occupations, lifetime earnings. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Washington, DC.
  • Choy, S. (2002). Access and persistence: Findings from 10 years of longitudinal research on students. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.
  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678–707.
  • Colvin, R. L. (1997, October 1). Q & A: Should UC do away with the SAT? Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1997/oct/01/local/me-38061
  • Coyle, T. R., & Pillow, D. (2008). SAT and ACT predict college GPA after removing g. Intelligence, 36(6), 719–729.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–335.
  • Faulconer, J., Geissler, J., Majewski, D., & Trifilo, J. (2014). Adoption of an early-alert system to support university student success. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(2), 45–48.
  • Ferguson, R. (2004). Standardized tests and American Education. In R. Zwick (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions (pp. 25–32). New York, USA: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Freeberg, N. E. (1988). Analysis of the revised student descriptive questionnaire, Phase I: Accuracy of student reported information. ( College Board Report No. 88-5). New York, USA: College Board Publications.
  • Hiss, W. C., & Franks, V. W. (2014). Defining promise: Optional standardized testing policies in American college and university admissions. Report of the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC). Retrieved from: http://www.nacacnet.org/research/research-data/nacacresearch/Documents/DefiningPromise.pdf.
  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 594–612. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594
  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
  • Kobrin, J. L., & Patterson, B. F. (2011). Contextual factors associated with the validity of SAT scores and high school GPA for predicting first-year college grades. Educational Assessment, 16(4), 207–226. doi:10.1080/10627197.2011.635956
  • Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). The validity of the SAT for predicting first-year college grade point average. (College Board Research Report 2008-5). New York, USA: The College Board.
  • Kohn, A. (2001). Two cheers for an end to the SAT. Chronicle of Higher Education, 9, B–12.
  • Kopp, J. P., & Shaw, E. J. (2016). How final is leaving college while in academic jeopardy? Examining the utility of differentiating college leavers by academic standing. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 18(1), 2–30. doi:10.1177/1521025115579670
  • Lehmann, N. (2000). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, USA: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Linn, R. L., Harnisch, D. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1981). Corrections for range restriction: An empirical investigation of conditions resulting in conservative corrections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(6), 655–663. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.66.6.655
  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Mattern, K. D., Marini, J. P., & Shaw, E. J. (2015). Identification of multiple nonreturner profiles to inform the development of targeted college retention interventions. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 17(1), 18–43. doi:10.1177/1521025115571091
  • Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2010). The relationship between SAT scores and retention to the third year: 2006 cohort. (College Board Statistical Report 2011-2). New York, USA: The College Board.
  • Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2011a). Validity of the SAT for predicting second-year grades: 2006 SAT validity sample. (College Board Statistical Report 2011-1). New York, USA: The College Board.
  • Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2011b). Validity of the SAT for predicting third-year grades: 2006 SAT validity sample. (College Board Statistical Report 2011-3). New York, USA: The College Board.
  • Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2011c). The relationship between SAT scores and retention to the second year: 2007 validity sample. (College Board Statistical Report 2011-4). New York, USA: The College Board.
  • Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2013). Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: A response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 134–147. doi:10.1037/a0030610
  • Noble, J., & Sawyer, R. (2002). Predicting different levels of academic success in college using high school GPA and ACT composite score. (ACT Research Report 2002-4). Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.
  • Radunzel, J., & Noble, J. (2012). Tracking 2003 ACT-tested high school graduates: College readiness, enrollment, and long-term success. (ACT Research Report 2012-2). Iowa City, IA: ACT.
  • Robbins, S., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Peterson, C., & Le, H. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 598–616. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.598
  • Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admission tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1–22. doi:10.1037/a0013978
  • Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Beatty, A. S., Rigdon, J. L., Shen, W., & Kiger, T. B. (2012). The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1000–1007. doi:10.1177/0956797612438732
  • SAS Institute. (2016). SAS enterprise guide, version 7.13. Cary, NC: Author.
  • Sawyer, R. (2008). Benefits of additional high school coursework and improved course performance in preparing students for college. (ACT Research Report 2008-1). Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.
  • Sawyer, R. (2013). Beyond correlations: Usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(2), 89–112. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.765433
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199–223. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.199
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Caplan, J. R. (1981). Validity generalization results for two job groups in the petroleum industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 261–273.
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2014). Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods: version 2.0. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organization.
  • Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Ilies, R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual-differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 206–224. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.206
  • Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Oh, I.S. (2013). Are true scores and constructs the same? A critical examination of their substitutability and the implications for research results. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 341–354. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12044
  • Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. doi:10.1037/bul0000098
  • Shaw, E. J., & Mattern, K. D. (2013). Examining student under- and overperformance in college to identify risk of attrition. Educational Assessment, 18(4), 251–268. doi:10.1080/10627197.2013.846676
  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72–101. doi:10.2307/1412159
  • Tampke, D. R. (2013). Developing, implementing, and assessing an early alert system. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, and Practice, 14(4), 523–532. doi:10.2190/CS.14.4.e
  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865–885. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
  • Westfall, J., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PloS One, 11(3), 1–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152719
  • Westrick, P. A., Le, H., Robbins, S. B., Radunzel, J. M., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). College performance and retention: A meta-analysis of the predictive validities of ACT® cores, high school grades, and SES. Educational Assessment, 20(1), 23–45. doi:10.1080/10627197.2015.997614
  • Zumbrun, J. (2014, October 7). SAT scores and income inequality: How wealthier kids rank higher. Retrieved from http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2014/10/07/sat-scores-and-income-inequality-how-wealthier-kids-rank-higher/
  • Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York, USA: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Zwick, R. (2006). Higher education admission testing. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 647–679). Westport, CT: American Council on Education, Praeger.
  • Zwick, R., & Himelfarb, I. (2011). The effect of high school socioeconomic status on the predictive validity of SAT scores and high school grade-point average. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 101–121. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00136.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.