Advanced search
Publication Cover
Educational Assessment Volume 28, 2023 - Issue 2: Fairness in Educational Assessment and the Next Edition of the Standards
Submit an article Journal homepage
304
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Fairness in Educational Assessment and the Next Edition of the Standards: Concluding Commentary

Joan L. Hermana National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards & Student Testing (CRESST), School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
Jose Felipe Martínezb Department of Education, School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
&
Alison L. Baileyb Department of Education, School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
Pages 128-136 | Published online: 28 May 2023

References

  • Allen, N. L., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2005). Measuring the benefits of examinee- selected questions. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42(1), 27–51. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0655.2005.00003.x
  • Brabeck, M., Jeffrey, J., & Fry, S. (2015) Practice for knowledge acquisition, not drill and kill. Applications of psychological science to teaching and learning modules. https://www.apa.org/education-career/k12/practice-acquisition#:~:text=Practice%20helps%20us%20increase%20our,more%20challenging%20information%20and%20problems.
  • Bridgeman, B., Morgan, R., & Wang, M. (1997). Choice among essay topics: Impact on performance validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34(3), 273–286. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00519.x
  • Gabrielson, S., Gordon, B., & Engelhard, G., Jr. (1995). The effects of task choice on the quality of writing obtained in a statewide assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 8(4), 273–290. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0804_1
  • Herman, J., & Cook, L. (2022). Broadening the reach of the fairness standards. In K. Geisinger & J. Jonson (Eds.), Fairness in educational and psychological testing: Examining theoretical, research, practice, and policy implications of the 2014 Standards. 33–60. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Hilliard, A. G., III. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 293–304. doi:10.1177/0022487100051004005
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465
  • Linn, R. L. (2000, March). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X029002004
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2019). Monitoring educational equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25389/monitoring-educational-equity
  • Powers, D. E., Fowles, M. E., Farnum, M., & Gerritz, K. (1992). Giving a choice of topics on a test of basic writing skills: Does it make any difference? (ETS Tech. Rep. No. 92-19). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336.
  • Shepard, L. A. (2021, Fall). Ambitious teaching and equitable assessment. American Educator, 45(3). https://www.aft.org/ae/fall2021/shepard
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
  • Wicherts, J. M., Dolan, C. V., & Hessen, D. J. (2005). Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89(5), 696–716. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.696

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.