Reading Comprehension Tests: Students’ Question Reading and Responding Behavior

References

• Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests [question and with or without text, IES grant 2015]. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S. P., Binder, K. S., Kulesz, P. A., Nimocks, E., & Mellott, J. A. (2024). Examining the influence of passage and student characteristics on test-taking strategies: An eye-tracking study. Learning and Individual Differences, 109, 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardoin, S. P., Binder, K. S., Zawoyski, A. M., Nimocks, E., & Foster, T. E. (2019). Measuring the behavior of reading comprehension test takers: What do they do, and should they do it? Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 507. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayroles, J., Potocki, A., Ros, C., Cerdán, R., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2021). Do you know what you are reading for? Exploring the effects of a task model enhancement on fifth graders’ purposeful reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(4), 837–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, H. I. (2014). Developmental changes in eye movements and visual information encoding associated with learning to read. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414530145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Brewer, W. F. (1985). Discourse structure and mental models. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 27(27), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219852706
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cataldo, M. G., & Oakhill, J. (2000). Why are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2011). Selecting information to answer questions: Strategic individual differences when searching texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., Máñez, I., & Serrano-Mendizábal, M. (2021). Reading from multiple documents: The role of text availability and question type. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S209–S220. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.380
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., Hsiao, Y.-Y., Lee, K., Martinez-Lincoln, A., Moore, C., Toste, J., & Simmons, L. (2021). The differential importance of component skills on reading comprehension test performance among struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420932139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 33(9), 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium, Currie, N. K., & Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2019). Inference making in young children: The concurrent and longitudinal contributions of verbal working memory and vocabulary. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(8), 1416–1431.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2001). Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daucourt, M. C., Schatschneider, C., Connor, C. M., Al Otaiba, S., & Hart, S. A. (2018). Inhibition, updating working memory, and shifting predict reading disability symptoms in a hybrid model: Project KIDS. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(238). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I.-A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590910584
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., & Compton, D. L. (2017). Beyond comprehension strategy instruction: What’s next? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, L., Martinez, T., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2015). Online assessment of strategic reading literacy skills. Computers & Education, 82, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository texts? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). Guildford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. D., & Barrett, T. C. (1981). Prose comprehension: A descriptive analysis of instructional practices. In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Eds.), Children’s’ prose Comprehension: Theory and practice (pp. 72–102). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Lehtola, A., & Paattilammi, S. (2015). The influence of a reading task on children’s eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1005623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth‐grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraal, A., van den Broek, P. W., Koornneef, A. W., Ganushchak, L. Y., & Saab, N. (2019). Differences in text processing by low- and high-comprehending beginning readers of expository and narrative texts: Evidence from eye movements. Learning & Individual Differences, 74, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F. (2015). What about expository text? In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 348–361). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucid Innovations Limited. (2013). Lucid Recall Administrator’s Manual. Lucid Research Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Gil, L., & Gilabert, R. (2009). On-line assessment of comprehension processes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potocki, A., Ros, C., Vibert, N., & Rouet, J.-F. (2017, November 02). Children’s visual scanning of textual documents: Effects of document organization, search goals, and metatextual knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(6), 480497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1334060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Mañá, A., Gil, L., & Naumann, J. (2015). Strategic decisions in task-oriented reading. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Hyönä, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Developmental eye-tracking research in reading: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1046877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, O. J., & Uppstad, P. H. (2011). Eye-tracking as a tool in process-oriented reading test validation. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Toffalini, E., Marsura, M., Garcia, R. B., & Cornoldi, C. (2019). A cross-modal working memory binding span deficit in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418786691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K. A., Binder, K. S., Ardoin, S. P., Talwar, A., & Tighe, E. L.(2021). Third graders’ strategy use and accuracy on an expository text: An exploratory study using eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 44, 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., & Cerdán, R. (2013). Read&Answer: An application to study task-oriented reading situations. Information Design Journal (IDJ), 20(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.20.1.07vid
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Martinez, T., Salmerón, L., Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Gil, L., Mañá, A., Llorens, A. C., & Ferris, R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with read&Answer. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieiro, P., & Garcia-Madruga, J. A. (1997). An analysis of story comprehension through spoken and written summaries in school-age children. Reading and Writing, 9(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007932429184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Min, W., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Peijia, Z. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 867–887. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., & Woodwyk, J. M. (2010). Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X485700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (2011). Woodcock reading mastery tests – (3rd ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zawoyski, A., Ardoin, S. P., & Meisinger, E. (2019). Using eye-tracking technology to examine the impact of question format on reading behavior in elementary students. School Psychology Review, 48(4), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2018-0014.V48-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar