653
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Exploring Public Relations Research Topics and Inter-Cluster Dynamics Through Computational Modeling (2010-2020): A Study Based on Two SSCI Journals

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 135-161 | Received 14 Feb 2022, Accepted 09 Feb 2023, Published online: 07 Mar 2023

References

  • Aldoory, L. (2001). Making health communications meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1302_3
  • Aldoory, L. (2005). A (re)conceived feminist paradigm for public relations: A case for substantial improvement. The Journal of Communication, 55(4), 668–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03016.x
  • Aldoory, L., Jiang, H., Toth, E. L., & Sha, B. -L. (2008). Is it still just a women’s issue? A study of work-life balance among men and women in public relations. The Public Relations Journal, 2(4), 1–20.
  • Aldoory, L., & Toth, E. L. (2021). The future of feminism in public relations and strategic communication: A socio-ecological model of influences. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Austin, L., Fisher Liu, B., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the social-mediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
  • Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
  • Bentley, J. M., & Ma, L. (2020). Testing perceptions of organizational apologies after a data breach crisis. Public Relations Review, 46(5), 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101975
  • Botan, C. H. (1993). Introduction to the paradigm struggle in public relations. Public Relations Review, 19(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90001-S
  • Botan, C. H., & Hazleton, V. (2006). Public relations in a new age. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 1–18). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Botan, C. H., & Soto, F. (1998). A semiotic approach to the internal functioning of publics: Implications for strategic communication and public relations. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80018-0
  • Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. The Journal of Communication, 54(4), 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02649.x
  • Cancel, A. E., Cameron, G. T., Sallot, L. M., & Mitrook, M. A. (1997). It depends: A contingency theory of accommodation in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0901_02
  • Ciszek, E. L. (2016). Digital activism: How social media and dissensus inform theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.002
  • Ciszek, E. L. (2018). Queering PR: Directions in theory and research for public relations scholarship. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(4), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1440354
  • Ciszek, E. L. (2020). “We are people, not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003
  • Ciszek, E. L., & Rodriguez, N. S. (2020). Power, agency and resistance in public relations: A queer of color critique of the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance. Communication Culture & Critique, 13(4), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa024
  • Claeys, A. -S., & Coombs, W. T. (2020). Organizational crisis communication: Suboptimal crisis response selection decisions and behavioral economics. Communication Theory, 30(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz002
  • Clementson, D. E. (2020). Narrative persuasion, identification, attitudes, and trustworthiness in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101889
  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  • Curtin, P. A. (2012). Public relations and philosophy: Parsing paradigms. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X11422150
  • Curtin, P. A., & Gaither, T. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1702_3
  • Davidson, S. (2020). Made by a human like you or me: Back to the Greek classics to further develop the rhetorical paradigm of public relations. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101888
  • Davies, C., & Hobbs, M. (2020). Irresistible possibilities: Examining the uses and consequences of social media influencers for contemporary public relations. Public Relations Review, 46(5), 101983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101983
  • De Moya, M., & Bravo, V. (2016). The role of public relations in ethnic advocacy and activism: A proposed research agenda. Public Relations Inquiry, 5(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16635225
  • DiStaso, M. W., McCorkindale, T., & Wright, D. K. (2011). How public relations executives perceive and measure the impact of social media in their organizations. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.06.005
  • Dozier, D. M., & Lauzen, M. M. (2000). Liberating the intellectual domain from the practice: Public relations, activism, and the role of the scholar. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_2
  • Dutta, M. J., & Elers, S. (2020). Public relations, indigeneity and colonization: Indigenous resistance as dialogic anchor. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101852
  • Eaddy, L. L., & Jin, Y. (2018). Crisis history tellers matter: The effects of crisis history and crisis information source on publics’ cognitive and affective responses to organizational crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0039
  • Edwards, L. (2012). Defining the “object” of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X11422149
  • Everett, M., & Borgatti, S. (2013). The dual-projection approach for two-mode networks. Social Networks, 35(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.05.004
  • Fawkes, J. (2014). Public relations ethics and professionalism: The shadow of excellence. Routledge.
  • Fawkes, J. (2018). The evolution of public relations research - an overview. Communication & Society, 31(4), 159–171.
  • Ferguson, M. A. (2018). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(4), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1514810
  • Ferguson, D. P., Wallace, J. D., & Chandler, R. C. (2018). Hierarchical consistency of strategies in image repair theory: PR practitioners’ perceptions of effective and preferred crisis communication strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(5–6), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1545129
  • Fitch, K. (2020). The PR girl. In K. Fitch & J. Motion (Eds.), Popular culture and social change: The hidden work of public relations (pp. 53–67). Routledge.
  • Golombisky, K. (2015). Renewing the commitments of feminist public relations theory from velvet ghetto to social justice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(5), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2015.1086653
  • Gower, K. K. (2006). Public relations research at the crossroads. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_6
  • Grunig, J. E. (2006). Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_5
  • Grunig, J. E., & Hickson, R. H. (1976). An evaluation of academic research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 2(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(76)80013-6
  • Grunig, L. A., & Toth, E. L. (2006). The ethics of communicating with and about difference in a changing society. In K. Fitzpatrick & C. Bronstein (Eds.), Ethics in public relations: Responsible advocacy (pp. 39–52). SAGE Publications.
  • Hallahan, K. (1993). The paradigm struggle and public relations practice. Public Relations Review, 19(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90009-2
  • Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
  • Harrison, V. S. (2018). Understanding the donor experience: Applying stewardship theory to higher education donors. Public Relations Review, 44(4), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.001
  • Heath, R. L. (2000). A rhetorical perspective on the values of public relations: Crossroads and pathways toward concurrence. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1201_5
  • Heath, R. L. (2006). Onward into more fog: Thoughts on public relations’ research directions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1802_2
  • Hobbs, M. J. (2020). Conflict ecology: Examining the strategies and rationales of lobbyists in the mining and energy industries in Australia. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101868
  • Holtzhausen, D. (2013). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory & practice. Routledge.
  • Hung-Baesecke, C. -J.F., Chen, Y. -R. -R., & Ni, L. (2021). The excellence theory – origins, contribution and critique. In C. Valentini (Ed.), Public relations (pp. 313–334). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110554250-016
  • Jain, R., De Moya, M., & Molleda, J. -C. (2014). State of international public relations research: Narrowing the knowledge gap about the practice across borders. Public Relations Review, 40(3), 595–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.009
  • Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2020). Mapping corporate social responsibility research in communication: A network and bibliometric analysis. Public Relations Review, 46(5), 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101963
  • Kennedy, A. K., & Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2015). A postmodern turn for social media research: Theory and research directions for public relations scholarship. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972406
  • Kent, M. L. (2011). Public relations rhetoric: Criticism, dialogue, and the long now. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911409881
  • Kent, M. L., & Lane, A. B. (2017). A rhizomatous metaphor for dialogic theory. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.017
  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2021). Fostering dialogic engagement: Toward an architecture of social media for social change. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984462
  • Kim, S., Avery, E. J., & Lariscy, R. W. (2009). Are crisis communicators practicing what we preach?: An evaluation of crisis response strategy analyzed in public relations research from 1991 to 2009. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 446–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.002
  • Kim, S. -Y., Choi, M. -I., Reber, B. H., & Kim, D. (2014). Tracking public relations scholarship trends: Using semantic network analysis on PR Journals from 1975 to 2011. Public Relations Review, 40(1), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.11.017
  • Kim, J. -N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. The Journal of Communication, 61(1), 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
  • Kim, S., & Liu, B. F. (2012). Are all crises opportunities? A comparison of how corporate and government organizations responded to the 2009 flu pandemic. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626136
  • Kim, J. -N., & Ni, L. (2010). Seeing the forest through the trees: The behavioral, strategic management paradigm in public relations and its future. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of public relations (pp. 35–57). SAGE Publications.
  • Kim, J. -N., & Ni, L. (2013). Two types of public relations problems and integrating formative and evaluative research: A review of research programs within the behavioral, strategic management paradigm. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.723276
  • Kim, J. -N., Ni, L., & Sha, B. -L. (2008). Breaking down the stakeholder environment: Explicating approaches to the segmentation of publics for public relations research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500403
  • Kim, C., & Yang, S. -U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
  • Kiousis, S., Ragas, M. W., Kim, J. Y., Schweickart, T., Neil, J., & Kochhar, S. (2016). Presidential agenda building and policymaking: Examining linkages across three levels. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1090441
  • Ki, E. -J., Pasadeos, Y., & Ertem-Eray, T. (2019). Growth of public relations research networks: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 31(1–2), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2019.1577739
  • Ki, E. -J., Pasadeos, Y., & Ertem-Eray, T. (2021). The structure and evolution of global public relations: A citation and co-citation analysis 1983–2019. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102012
  • Ki, E. -J., & Ye, L. (2017). An assessment of progress in research on global public relations from 2001 to 2014. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.12.005
  • Krishna, A. (2021). Lacuna publics: Advancing a typology of disinformation-susceptible publics using the motivation-attitude-knowledge framework. Journal of Public Relations Research, 33(2), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2021.1944155
  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (Fourth). The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lane, A. B. (2020). The dialogic ladder: Toward a framework of dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101870
  • Lan, X., Tarasevich, S., Proverbs, P., Myslik, B., & Kiousis, S. (2020). President Trump vs. CEOs: A comparison of presidential and corporate agenda building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(1–2), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1719494
  • Lee, S. Y., & Riffe, D. (2017). Who sets the corporate social responsibility agenda in the news media? Unveiling the agenda-building process of corporations and a monitoring group. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.007
  • Lee, N., Sha, B. -L., Dozier, D., & Sargent, P. (2015). The role of new public relations practitioners as social media experts. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 411–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.002
  • Lee, Y., & Yue, C. A. (2020). Status of internal communication research in public relations: An analysis of published articles in nine scholarly journals from 1970 to 2019. Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101906
  • Lemon, L. L. (2019). The employee experience: How employees make meaning of employee engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 31(5–6), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2019.1704288
  • Len-Ríos, M. E., Finneman, T., Han, K. J., Bhandari, M., & Perry, E. L. (2015). Image repair campaign strategies addressing race: Paula Deen, social media, and defiance. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1008637
  • L’etang, J. (2005). Critical public relations: Some reflections. Public Relations Review, 31(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.011
  • Liu, B. F., & Horsley, J. S. (2007). The government communication decision wheel: Toward a public relations model for the public sector. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260701402473
  • Liu, B. F., Jin, Y., Austin, L., Kuligowski, E., & Young, C. E. (2020). The social-mediated crisis communication (SMCC) model: Identifying the next frontier. In Y. Jin, B. H. Reber, & G. Nowak (Eds.), Advancing crisis communication effectiveness: Integrating public relations scholarship with practice (pp. 214–230). Routledge.
  • Logan, N. (2011). The white leader prototype: A critical analysis of race in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.605974
  • Logan, N. (2019). Corporate personhood and the corporate responsibility to race. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3893-3
  • Logan, N. (2021). A theory of corporate responsibility to race (CRR): Communication and racial justice in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 33(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2021.1881898
  • Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (1999). Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theory, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00160.x
  • McKie, D., & Munshi, D. (2007). Reconfiguring public relations: Ecology, equity, and enterprise. Routledge.
  • McKie, D., & Munshi, D. (2009). Theoretical black holes: A partial a to Z of missing critical thought in public relations. In R. L. Heath, E. L. Toth, & D. Waymer (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 61–75). Routledge.
  • Meadows, C., & Meadows, C. W. (2014). The history of academic research in public relations: Tracking research trends over nearly four decades. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 871–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.06.005
  • Melamed, D., & Eriksson, K. (2014). Community structures in bipartite networks: A dual-projection approach. Plos One, 9(5), e97823. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097823
  • Men, L. R., Yue, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2020). “Vision, passion, and care: ” the impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change. Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101927
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Morehouse, J., & Saffer, A. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of dialogue and digital dialogic research: Mapping the knowledge construction and invisible colleges in public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(3), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1498343
  • Morehouse, J., & Saffer, A. J. (2019). Illuminating the invisible college: An analysis of foundational and prominent publications of engagement research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 45(5), 101836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101836
  • Munshi, D., Kurian, P., & Xifra, J. (2017). An (other) ‘story’ in history: Challenging colonialist public relations in novels of resistance. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.016
  • Page, T. G. (2020). Measuring success: Explications and measurement scales of instructing information and adjusting information. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101952
  • Page, T. G., & Capizzo, L. W. (2021). From “an open field” to established “waves”: Public relations scholarship through the lens of Public Relations Review. Public Relations Review, 47(5), 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102115
  • Pal, M., & Dutta, M. J. (2008). Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260801894280
  • Pang, A., Jin, Y., & Cameron, G. T. (2010). Strategic management of communication: Insights from the contingency theory of strategic conflict management. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of public relations (pp. 17–34). SAGE Publications.
  • Pang, A., Jin, Y., & Cameron, G. T. (2021). Contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Explicating a “grand” theory of public relations. In C. Valentini (Ed.), Public relations (pp. 381–398). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110554250-016/
  • Pasadeos, Y., Berger, B., & Renfro, R. B. (2010). Public relations as a maturing discipline: An update on research networks. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003601390
  • Pasadeos, Y., & Renfro, B. (1992). A bibliometric analysis of public relations research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(3), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0403_03
  • Pasadeos, Y., Renfro, R. B., & Hanily, M. L. (1999). Influential authors and works of the public relations scholarly literature: A network of recent research. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_02
  • Place, K. R., Edwards, L., & Bowen, S. A. (2021). Dignity and respect or homocommodification? Applying moral philosophy to LGBTQ public relations. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102085
  • Pratt, C. B., & Yanada, A. (2014). Risk communication and Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant meltdown: Ethical implications for government-citizen divides. The Public Relations Journal, 8(4), 1–27. https://prjournal.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2014PrattYanada.pdf
  • Pressgrove, G., McKeever, R., & Collins, E. (2021). Effectiveness of persuasive frames in advocacy videos. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102060
  • Putnam, L. L. (1982). Paradigms for organizational communication research: An overview and synthesis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318209374077
  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91 (2). 2. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02.
  • Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Albertson, B., & Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103
  • Sallot, L. M., Lyon, L. J., Acosta-Alzuru, C., & Ogata Jones, K. (2003). From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(1), 27–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1501_2
  • Sisco, H. F., Collins, E. L., & Zoch, L. M. (2011). Breadth or depth? A content analysis of the use of public relations theory. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.006
  • Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Kent, M. L. (2015). Civil society, networks, and relationship management: Beyond the organization–public dyad. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2015.1025405
  • Song, H., Eberl, J. -M., & Eisele, O. (2020). Less fragmented than we thought? Toward clarification of a subdisciplinary linkage in communication science, 2010–2019. The Journal of Communication, 70(3), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa009
  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2016). Towards legitimacy and professionalism: A call to repeal the Gillett Amendment. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.09.012
  • Tindall, N. T. J., & Waters, R. D. (2012). Coming out to tell our stories: Using queer theory to understand the career experiences of gay men in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(5), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.723279
  • Toth, E. L. (1992). The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical, and systems perspectives. In E. L. Toth & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 3–15). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Toth, E. L. (2002). Postmodernism for modernist public relations: The cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00130-3
  • Toth, E. L. (2009). The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical, and excellence perspectives. In R. L. Heath, E. L. Toth, & D. Waymer (Eds.), Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations II (pp. 48–60). Routledge.
  • Toth, E. L. (2010). Reflection on the field. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of public relations (pp. 711–722). SAGE Publications.
  • Toth, E. L., & Cline, C. G. (1991). Public relations practitioner attitudes toward gender issues: A benchmark study. Public Relations Review, 17(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(91)90053-N
  • Trujillo, N., & Toth, E. L. (1987). Organizational perspectives for public relations research and practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318987001002004
  • Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2002). Crisis management and the discourse of renewal: Understanding the potential for positive outcomes of crisis. Public Relations Review, 28(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00165-0
  • Vafeiadis, M., Harrison, V. S., Diddi, P., Dardis, F., & Buckley, C. (2021). Strategic nonprofit communication: Effects of cross-sector corporate social responsibility (CSR) alliances on nonprofits and the mediating role of social-objectives achievement and consumer brand identification. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1945610
  • van der Meer, T. G., Verhoeven, P., Beentjes, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2014). When frames align: The interplay between PR, news media, and the public in times of crisis. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.07.008
  • van Ruler, B. (2016). Public relations: Too little emphasis on communication. Communication Management Review, 1(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.22522/cmr20160101
  • Vardeman, J., & Sebesta, A. (2020). The problem of intersectionality as an approach to digital activism: The Women’s March on Washington’s attempt to unite all women. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(1–2), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1716769
  • Vardeman-Winter, J. (2011). Confronting whiteness in public relations campaigns and research with women. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(4), 412–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2011.605973
  • Vardeman-Winter, J., & Tindall, N. T. J. (2010). “If it’s a woman’s issue, I pay attention to it”: Gendered and intersectional complications in the Heart Truth media campaign. PRism, 7(4), 1–15.
  • Verčič, A. T., Lalić, D., & Vujičić, D. (2017). Journalists and public relations practitioners: Comparing two countries. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.006
  • Volk, S. C. (2016). A systematic review of 40 years of public relations evaluation and measurement research: Looking into the past, the present, and future. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 962–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.003
  • Wang, Y., Cheng, Y., & Sun, J. (2021). When public relations meets social media: A systematic review of social media related public relations research from 2006 to 2020. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102081
  • Waters, R. D., Tindall, N. T. J., & Morton, T. S. (2010). Media catching and the journalist–public relations practitioner relationship: How social media are changing the practice of media relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(3), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003799202
  • Waymer, D., & Heath, R. L. (2019). The public relations paradox of erasure: Damnatio memoriae as public relations strategy and tactic. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.011
  • Werder, K. P. (2005). An empirical analysis of the influence of perceived attributes of publics on public relations strategy use and effectiveness. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(3), 217–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_2
  • Wirtz, J. G., & Zimbres, T. M. (2018). A systematic analysis of research applying ‘principles of dialogic communication’ to organizational websites, blogs, and social media: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(1–2), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146
  • Xu, S. (2018). Discourse of renewal: Developing multiple-item measurement and analyzing effects on relationships. Public Relations Review, 44(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.09.005
  • Xu, S., & Xiong, Y. (2020). Setting socially mediated engagement parameters: A topic modeling and text analytic approach to examining polarized discourses on Gillette’s campaign. Public Relations Review, 46(5), 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101959
  • Yang, A., & Saffer, A. J. (2019). Embracing a network perspective in the network society: The dawn of a new paradigm in strategic public relations. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101843
  • Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2015). Looking over, looking out, and moving forward: Positioning public relations in theorizing organizational network ecologies. Communication Theory, 25(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12049
  • Yaxley, H. M. (2012). Exploring the origins of careers in public relations. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.014
  • Ye, L., & Ki, E. -J. (2012). The status of online public relations research: An analysis of published articles in 1992–2009. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(5), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.723277
  • Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
  • Zhou, A. (2019). Bring publics back into networked public relations research: A dual-projection approach for network ecology. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.004
  • Zhou, A. (2021). Communicating corporate LGBTQ advocacy: A computational comparison of the global CSR discourse. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102061
  • Zoch, L. M., & Molleda, J. -C. (2006). Building a theoretical model of media relations using framing, information subsidies, and agenda-building. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 279–310). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.