ToxRead: A tool to assist in read across and its use to assess mutagenicity of chemicalsFootnote

^£Presented at the 16th International Workshop on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental and Health Sciences (QSAR2014), 16–20 June 2014, Milan, Italy.

References

• E. Benfenati, G. Gini, S. Hoffmann, and R. Luttik, Comparing in vivo, in vitro, in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment: Problems and prospects, ATLA 38 (2010), pp. 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati and R. Gonella Diaza, A. Cassano, S. Pardoe, G. Gini, C. Mays, R. Knauf, and L. Benighaus, The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives, Chem. Cent. J. 5 (2011), p. 58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Livingstone, The characterization of chemical structures using molecular properties: A survey, J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 195–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OECD, The OECD QSAR toolbox, version 3.1, 2014; software available at http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/theoecdqsartoolbox.htm.
   Google Scholar
• AMBIT, Version 2.4.11, 2014; software available at http://ambit.sourceforge.net/.
   Google Scholar
• G. Patlewicz, D.W. Roberts, A. Aptula, K. Blackburn, and B. Hubesch, Workshop Report: Use of ‘read-across’ for chemical safety assessment under REACH, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 65 (2013), pp. 226–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Benigni, C. Bossa, N.G. Jeliazkova, T.I. Netzeva, and A.P. Worth, The Benigni/Bossa rulebase for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity - A module of Toxtree, EUR-Scientific and Technical Report Series, EUR 23241 EN, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• R. Benigni and C. Bossa, Structural alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology, Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. 659 (2008), pp. 248–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kazius, R. Mcguire, and R. Bursi, Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction, J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005), pp. 312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.S. Rosenkranz, Y.P. Zhang, and G. Klopman, Studies on the potential for genotoxic carcinogenicity of fragrances and other chemicals, Food Chem. Toxicol. 36 (1998), pp. 687–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Benigni, T.I. Netzeva, E. Benfenati, C. Bossa, R. Franke, C. Helma, E. Hulzebos, C. Marchant, A. Richard, Y.T. Woo, and C. Yang, The expanding role of predictive toxicology: An update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens, J. Environ. Sci. Health C 25 (2007), pp. 53–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, R. Benigni, D.M. Demarini, C. Helma, D. Kirkland, T.M. Martin, P. Mazzatorta, G. Ouedraogo-Arras, A.M. Richard, B. Schilter, W.G. Schoonen, R.D. Snyder, and C. Yang, Predictive models of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: Frameworks, state-of-the-art and perspectives, J. Environ. Sci. Health C 27 (2009), pp. 57–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.N. Ames, The detection of environmental mutagens and potential, Cancer 53 (1984), pp. 2030–2040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ashby, Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity, Environ. Mutagen. 7 (1985), pp. 919–921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• W.W. Piegorsch and E. Zeiger, Measuring intra-assay agreement for the Ames salmonella assay, in Statistical Methods in Toxicology, Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, L. Hotorn, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991, pp. 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• C. Hansch, P.P. Malony, T. Fujita, and R.M. Muir, Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants with partition coefficients, Nature 194 (1962), pp. 178–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A. Miller and E.C. Miller, Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules, Cancer 47 (1981), pp. 2327–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ashby and R.W. Tennant, Chemical structure, salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested by the U.S. NCI/NTP, Mutat. Res. 204 (1988), pp. 17–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Liao, J. Yao, and S. Yuan, Prediction of mutagenic toxicity by combination of recursive partitioning and support vector machines, Mol. Divers. 11 (2007), pp. 59–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zheng, Z. Liu, C. Xue, W. Zhu, K. Chen, X. Luo, and H. Jiang, Mutagenic probability estimation of chemical compounds by a novel molecular electrophilicity vector and support vector machine, Bioinformatics 22 (2006), pp. 2099–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ferrari and G. Gini, An open source multistep model to predict mutagenicity from statistical analysis and relevant structural alerts, Chem. Cent. J. 4(Suppl. 1) (2010), p. 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Perrotta, D. Malacarne, M. Taningher, R. Pesenti, M. Paolucci, and S. Parodi, A computerized connectivity approach for analyzing the structural basis of mutagenicity in salmonella and its relationship with rodent carcinogenicity, Mol. Mutagen. 28 (1996), pp. 31–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.D. Snyder, G.S. Pearl, G. Mandakes, W.N. Choy, F. Goodsaid, and I.Y. Rosenblum, Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 43 (2004), pp. 143–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Golbamaki Bakhtyari, G. Raitano, E. Benfenati, T.M. Martin, and D. Young, Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity, J. Environ. Sci. Health C 31 (2013), pp. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• A. Cassano, G. Raitano, E. Mombelli, A. Fernandez, J. Cester, A. Roncaglioni, and E. Benfenati, Evaluation of QSAR Models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity: A retrospective exercise on the chemical substances registered under the EU REACH regulation, J. Environ. Sci. Health C 32 (2014), pp. 273–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, A Manganaro, and G. Gini, VEGA-QSAR: AI inside a platform for predictive toxicology, Proceedings of Workshop PAI 2013, 5 December 2013, Turin, Italy, pp. 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, G. Raitano, and G. Gini, Overtaking barriers between toxicologists and computers: The example of VEGA, Proceedings of IHCI 2013 –Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Prague, 22–24 July 2013, pp. 268–272.
   Google Scholar
• G. Gini, T. Ferrari, D. Cattaneo, N.G. Bakhtyari, A. Manganaro, and E. Benfenati, Automatic knowledge extraction from chemical structures: The case of mutagenicity prediction, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 365–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ANTARES project: Alternative Non-Testing methods Assessed for REACH Substances. Funded by the LIFE+ EC Programme 2010–2012. Website available at: http://www.antares-life.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• K. Hansen, S. Mika, T. Schroeter, A. Sutter, A. ter Laak, T. Steger-Hartmann, N. Heinrich, and K.R. Müller, Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 2077–2081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemistry Development Kit; software available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cdk/.
   Google Scholar
• Java Universal Network/Graph Framework; software available at: http://jung.sourceforge.net/.
   Google Scholar
• HyperSQL; software available at: http://hsqldb.org/.
   Google Scholar
• M. Floris, A. Manganaro, O. Nicolotti, R. Medda, G.F. Mangiatordi, and E. Benfenati, A generalizable definition of chemical similarity for read-across, J. Cheminf. in press.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), The Use of Alternatives to Testing on Animals for the REACH Regulation. Second report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation, ECHA, Helsinki, 2014.
   Google Scholar