109
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Modelling the water–plant cuticular polymer matrix membrane partitioning of diverse chemicals in multiple plant species using the support vector machine-based QSAR approach

&
Pages 171-186 | Received 21 Sep 2017, Accepted 19 Dec 2017, Published online: 18 Jan 2018

References

  • N. Basant, S. Gupta, and K.P. Singh, In silico prediction of the developmental toxicity of diverse organic chemicals in rodents for regulatory purposes, Toxicol. Res. 5 (2016), pp. 773–787.
  • B. Welke, K. Ettlinger, and M. Riederer, Sorption of volatile organic chemicals in plant surfaces, Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998), pp. 1099–1104.
  • M. Riederer, Partitioning and transport of organic chemicals between the atmospheric environment and leaves, in Plant Contamination: Modeling and Simulation of Organic Chemical Processes, S. Trapp and C. McFarlane, eds., CRC Press, Florida, 1995, pp. 153–189.
  • H. Yin, Q. Tan, Y. Chen, G. Lv, D. He, and X. Hou, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PAHs) pollution recorded in annual rings of gingko (Gingko biloba L.): Translocation, radial diffusion, degradation and modeling, Microchem. J. 97 (2011), pp. 131–137.
  • A. Sabijic, H. Gusten, J. Schonherr, and M. Riederer, Modeling plant uptake of airborne organic chemicals. 1. Plant cuticle/water partitioning and molecular connectivity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 24 (1990), pp. 1321–1326.
  • C. Evelyne, C. Andre, T. Georges, and T. Michel, Quantitative relationships between structure and penetration of phenylurea herbicides through isolated plant cuticles, Chemosphere 24 (1992), pp. 189–200.
  • M.D. Polder, E.M. Hulzebos, and D.T. Jager, Bioconcentration of gaseous organic chemicals in plant leaves: Comparison of experimental data with model predictions, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 17 (1998), pp. 962–968.
  • S. Merk and M. Riederer, Sorption of volatile C1 to C6 alkanols in plant cuticles, J. Exp. Bot. 48 (1997), pp. 1095–1104.
  • J.A. Platts and M.H. Abraham, Partition of volatile organic compounds from air and from water into plant cuticular matrix: An LFER analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000), pp. 318–323.
  • OECD, Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085442-en
  • V.N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
  • V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1999.
  • K.P. Singh, S. Gupta, and P. Rai, Predicting acute aquatic toxicity of structurally diverse in fish using artificial intelligence approaches, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 95 (2013), pp. 221–233.
  • S. Gupta, N. Basant, and K.P. Singh, Predicting aquatic toxicities of benzene derivatives in multiple test species using local, global and interspecies QSTR modeling approaches, RSC Adv. 5 (2015), pp. 71153–71163.
  • S. Gupta, N. Basant, P. Rai, and K.P. Singh, Modeling the binding affinity of structurally diverse industrial chemicals to carbon using the artificial intelligence approaches, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (2015), pp. 17810–17827.
  • W.-D. Cheng and C.-Z. Cai, Accurate model to predict the solubility of fullerene C60 organic solvents by using support vector regression, Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 25 (2017), pp. 58–64.
  • L. Zhao, Y.H. Dong, and H. Wang, Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China, Sci. Total Environ. 408 (2010), pp. 1069–1075.
  • G. Tcheslavski and A.A. (Louis) Beex, Effects of smoking, schizotypy, and eyes open/closed conditions on the γ1 rhythm phase synchrony of the electroencephalogram, Biomed. Signal Proces. 5 (2010), pp. 164−173.
  • A. Mauri, V. Consonni, M. Pavan, and R. Todeschini, Dragon software: An easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 56 (2006), pp. 237–248.
  • Kode srl, Dragon (software for molecular descriptor calculation) version 7.0.6, Italy, Dragon, 2016; software available at https://chm.kode-solutions.net.
  • ChemSpider, software, North Carolina, United States, software available at available at www.chemspider.com.
  • PubChem, NCBI, available at http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/
  • Z. Reitermanov, Data splitting, WDS’10 Proceedings of contributed papers, part I, Prague, 2010, pp. 31–36.
  • N. Basant and S. Gupta, Modeling uptake of nanoparticles in multiple human cells using structure-activity relationships and intercellular uptake correlations, Nanotoxicology 11 (2017), pp. 20–30.
  • N. Basant and S. Gupta, Multi-target QSTR modeling for simultaneous prediction of multiple toxicity endpoints of nano-metal oxides, Nanotoxicology 11 (2017), pp. 339–350.
  • N. Basant and S. Gupta, QSAR modeling for predicting mutagenic toxicity of diverse chemicals for regulatory purposes, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (2017), pp. 14430–14444.
  • S. Gupta and N. Basant, Modeling the aqueous phase reactivity of hydroxyl radical towards diverse organic micropollutants: An aid to water decontamination processes, Chemosphere 185 (2017), pp. 1164–1172.
  • S. Gupta and N. Basant, Modeling the reactivity of ozone and sulphate radical towards organic chemicals in water using machine learning approaches, RSC Adv. 6 (2016), pp. 108448–108457.
  • G. Patlewicz, N. Jeliazkova, A. Gallegos Saliner, and A.P. Worth, Toxmatch - a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 19 (2008), pp. 397–412.
  • K.P. Singh, S. Gupta, and N. Basant, In silico prediction of cellular permeability of diverse chemicals using qualitative and quantitative SAR modeling approaches, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 140 (2015), pp. 61–72.
  • K.P. Singh, A. Malik, V.K. Singh, D. Mohan, and S. Sinha, Chemometric analysis of groundwater quality data of alluvial aquifer of Gangetic plain, North India, Anal. Chim. Acta 550 (2005), pp. 82–91.
  • K.P. Singh, V.K. Singh, A. Malik, N. Sharma, R.C. Murthy, and R. Kumar, Hydrochemistry of wet atmospheric precipitation over an urban area in northern indo-gangetic plains, Environ. Monit. Assess. 131 (2007), pp. 237–254.
  • C. Rucker, G. Rucker, and M. Meringer, Y-Randomization and its variants in QSPR/QSAR, J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 47 (2007), pp. 2345–2357.
  • I. Mitra, A. Saha, and K. Roy, Exploring quantitative structure–activity relationship studies of antioxidant phenolic compounds obtained from traditional Chinese medicinal plants, Mol. Simul. 36 (2010), pp. 1067–1079.
  • K.P. Singh, N. Basant, and S. Gupta, Support vector machine in water quality management, Anal. Chim. Acta 703 (2011), pp. 152–162.
  • Y. Pan, J. Jiang, R. Wang, and H. Cao, Advantages of support vector machine in QSPR studies for predicting auto-ignition temperatures of organic compounds, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 92 (2008), pp. 169–178.
  • D.L. Alexander, A. Tropsha, and D.A. Winkler, Beware of R2: Simple, unambiguous assessment of the prediction accuracy of QSAR and QSPR models, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55 (2015), pp. 1316–1322.
  • T.I. Netzeva, A.P. Worth, T. Aldenberg, R. Benigni, M.T.D. Cronin, P. Gramatica, J.S. Jaworska, S. Kahn, G. Klopman, C.A. Marchant, G. Myatt, N. Nikolova-Jeliazkova, G.Y. Patlewicz, R. Perkins, D.W. Roberts, T.W. Schultz, D.T. Stanton, J.J.M. Van De Sandt, W. Tong, G. Veith, and C. Yang, Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship, ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim. 33 (2005), pp. 155–173.
  • P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701.
  • T. Puzyn, B. Rasulev, A. Gajewicz, X. Hu, T.P. Dasari, A. Michalkova, H.M. Hwang, A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynska, Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 (2011), pp. 175–178.
  • K.P. Singh, S. Gupta, and D. Mohan, Evaluating influences of seasonal variations and anthropogenic activities on alluvial groundwater hydrochemistry using ensemble learning approaches, J. Hydrol. 511 (2014), pp. 254–266.
  • L. Eriksson, J. Jaworska, A.P. Worth, M.T.D. Cronin, R.M. McDowell, and P. Gramatica, Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification and regression based QSARs, Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003), pp. 1361–1375.
  • K.P. Singh, P. Ojha, A. Malik, and G. Jain, Partial least squares and artificial neural networks modelling for predicting chlorophenol removal from aqueous solution, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 99 (2009), pp. 150–160.
  • W.E. Shafer and J. Schönherr, Accumulation and transport of phenol, 2-nitrophenol, and 4-nitrophenol in plant cuticles, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 10 (1985), pp. 239–252.
  • J. Schönherr and M. Riederer, Foliar penetration and accumulation of organic chemicals in plant cuticles, in Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (Continuation of Residue Reviews), G.W. Ware, ed., Springer, New York, 1989, Vol. 108 pp. 1–70.
  • R. Karbakhsh and R. Sabet, Application of different chemometric tools in QSAR study of azolo-adamantanes against influenza A virus, Res. Pharm. Sci. 6 (2011), pp. 23–33.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.