QSAR modelling using combined simple competitive learning networks and RBF neural networks

References

• J. Luo, J. Hu, L. Fu, C. Liu, and X. Jin, Use of artificial neural network for a QSAR study on neurotrophic activities of Np-tolyl/phenylsulfonyl L-amino acid thiolester derivatives, Procedia Eng. 15 (2011), pp. 5158–5163.
   Google Scholar
• A. Malek-Khatabi, M. Kompany-Zareh, S. Gholami, and S. Bagheri, Replacement based non-linear data reduction in radial basis function networks QSAR modeling, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 135 (2014), pp. 157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jalali-Heravi and M. Asadollahi-Baboli, Quantitative structure–activity relationship study of serotonin (5-HT7) receptor inhibitors using modified ant colony algorithm and adaptive neuro-fuzzy interference system (ANFIS), Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44 (2009), pp. 1463–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kissi and M. Ramdani, A hybrid decision trees-adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in prediction of anti-HIV molecules, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), pp. 6376–6380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Shahlaei and A. Pourhossein, Modeling of CCR5 antagonists as anti HIV agents using combined genetic algorithm and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (GA–ANFIS), Med. Chem. Res. 22 (2013), pp. 4423–4436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-S. So and M. Karplus, Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure− activity relationship: An application of genetic neural networks, J. Med. Chem. 39 (1996), pp. 1521–1530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Yaoa, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, H.F. Chen, R.S. Zhang, B.T. Fan, M.C. Liu, and Z.D. Hub, Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 535 (2005), pp. 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy, S. Paul, I. Mitra, and K. Roy, On two novel parameters for validation of predictive QSAR models, Molecules 14 (2009), pp. 1660–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Devillers, Linear versus nonlinear QSAR modeling of the toxicity of phenol derivatives to Tetrahymena pyriformis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 15 (2004), pp. 237–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.I. Netzeva, T.W. Schultz, A.O. Aptula, and M.T.D. Cronin, Partial least squares modelling of the acute toxicity of aliphatic compounds to Tetrahymena pyriformis, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14 (2003), pp. 265–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Goodarzi, M.P. Freitas, and R. Jensen, Ant colony optimization as a feature selection method in the QSAR modeling of anti-HIV-1 activities of 3-(3,5-dimethylbenzyl)uracil derivatives using MLR, PLS and SVM regressions, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 98 (2009), pp. 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yu, R. Su, L. Wang, W. Qi, and Z. He, Comparative QSAR modeling of antitumor activity of ARC-111 analogues using stepwise MLR, PLS, and ANN techniques, Med. Chem. Res. 19 (2010), pp. 1233–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, H. Sarimveis, P.A. Koutentis, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, and G. Kollias, A combined LS-SVM & MLR QSAR workflow for predicting the inhibition of CXCR3 receptor by quinazolinone analogs, Mol. Divers. 14 (2010), pp. 225–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Li, B. Lei, H. Liu, S. Li, X. Yao, M. Liu, and P. Gramatica, QSAR study of malonyl-CoA decarboxylase inhibitors using GA-MLR and a new strategy of consensus modeling, J. Comput. Chem. 29 (2008), pp. 2636–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Melagraki, A. Afantitis, K. Makridima, H. Sarimveis, and O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, Prediction of toxicity using a novel RBF neural network training methodology, J. Mol. Model. 12 (2006), pp. 297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Melagraki, A. Afantitis, H. Sarimveis, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, and A. Alexandridis, A novel RBF neural network training methodology to predict toxicity to Vibrio fischeri, Mol. Divers. 10 (2006), pp. 213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Habibi-Yangjeh, M. Danandeh-Jenagharad, and M. Nooshyar, Application of artificial neural networks for predicting the aqueous acidity of various phenols using QSAR, J. Mol. Model. 12 (2006), pp. 338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.R. Burden, M.G. Ford, D.C. Whitley, and D.A. Winkler, Use of automatic relevance determination in QSAR studies using Bayesian neural networks, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 (2000), pp. 1423–1430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• I.V. Tetko, V.V. Kovalishyn, and D.J. Livingstone, Volume learning algorithm artificial neural networks for 3D QSAR studies, J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001), pp. 2411–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Goodarzi, M.P. Freitas, and R. Jensen, Feature selection and linear/nonlinear regression methods for the accurate prediction of glycogen synthase kinase-3Β inhibitory activities, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49 (2009), pp. 824–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Antanasijević, D. Antanasijević, V. Pocajt, N. Trišović, and K. Fodor-Csorba, A QSPR study on the liquid crystallinity of five-ring bent-core molecules using decision trees, MARS and artificial neural networks, RSC Adv. 6 (2016), pp. 18452–18464.
   Google Scholar
• M. Asadollahi-Baboli, In silico evaluation, molecular docking and QSAR analysis of quinazoline-based EGFR-T790M inhibitors, Mol. Divers. 20 (2016), pp. 729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Qu, A. Yan, and J.S. Zhang, SAR and QSAR study on the bioactivities of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) inhibitors, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 111–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Doucet, E. Papa, A. Doucet-Panaye, and J. Devillers, QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of piperidine derivatives against Aedes aegypti, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 28 (2017), pp. 451–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Du, J. Wang, X. Zhang, and Z. Hu, A novel quantitative structure-activity relationship method to predict the affinities of MT3 melatonin binding site, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 43 (2008), pp. 2861–2869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gupta, N. Basant, D. Mohan, and K.P. Singh, Room-temperature and temperature-dependent QSRR modelling for predicting the nitrate radical reaction rate constants of organic chemicals using ensemble learning methods, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 539–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.L. Mai, C.K. Kim, B. Park, H.J. Park, S.H. Lee, and Y.M. Koo, Prediction of cellulose dissolution in ionic liquids using molecular descriptors based QSAR model, J. Mol. Liq. 215 (2016), pp. 541–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kryshchyshyn, O. Devinyak, D. Kaminskyy, P. Grellier, and R. Lesyk, Development of predictive QSAR models of 4-thiazolidinones antitrypanosomal activity using modern machine learning algorithms, Mol. Inform. preprint (2017). Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/minf.201700078/full.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Ren, Modeling the toxicity of aromatic compounds to Tetrahymena pyriformis: The response surface methodology with nonlinear methods, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003), pp. 1679–1687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. Ren, H. Liu, S. Li, X. Yao, and M. Liu, Prediction of binding affinities to beta1 isoform of human thyroid hormone receptor by genetic algorithm and projection pursuit regression, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007), pp. 2474–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.Z. Myint, L. Wang, Q. Tong, and X.Q. Xie, Molecular fingerprint-based artificial neural networks QSAR for ligand biological activity predictions, Mol. Pharm. 9 (2012), pp. 2912–2923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.J. Yao, A. Panaye, J.P. Doucet, R.S. Zhang, H.F. Chen, M.C. Liu, et al., Comparative study of QSAR/QSPR correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 44 (2004), pp. 1257–1266.
   Google Scholar
• B. Walczak and D.L. Massart, Local modelling with radial basis function networks, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50 (2000), pp. 179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Patrinos, A. Alexandridis, K. Ninos, and H. Sarimveis, Variable selection in nonlinear modeling based on RBF networks and evolutionary computation, Int. J. Neural Syst. 20 (2010), pp. 365–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.M. Vaziri and A. Shahsavand, Analysis of supersonic separators geometry using generalized radial basis function (GRBF) artificial neural networks, J. Nat. gas Sci. Eng. 13 (2013), pp. 30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yao, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, R. Zhang, M. Liu, Z. Hu, and B. Fan, Radial basis function neural network-based QSPR for the prediction of critical temperature, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 62 (2002), pp. 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Patra, R.W.S. Cheong, P.K. Meher, and G. Chakraborty, Determination of QSAR of aldose reductase inhibitors using an RBF network, in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2008. SMC 2008. IEEE International Conference on, 2008, pp. 1713–1718.
   Google Scholar
• N. Qu, L. Wang, M. Zhu, Y. Dou, and Y. Ren, Radial basis function networks combined with genetic algorithm applied to nondestructive determination of compound erythromycin ethylsuccinate powder, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 90 (2008), pp. 145–152. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4811535/?tp=&arnumber=4811535&filter%3DAND(p_IS_Number:4811240)%26pageNumber%3D20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Ojala and P. Vuorimaa, Modified Kohonen’s learning laws for RBF network, in Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms, D.W. Pearson, N. C. Steele, and R. F. Albrecht, eds., 1995, pp. 356–359.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hecht-Nielsen, Self-Organization and Associative Memory, IEEE J. Quant Electron 25 (1989), p. 237.
   Google Scholar
• K. Mehrotra, C.K. Mohan, and S. Ranka, Elements of Artificial Neural Networks, MIT Press, USA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• I. Kuzmanovski and M. Novič, Counter-propagation neural networks in Matlab, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 90 (2008), pp. 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kuzmanovski, M. Novič, and M. Trpkovska, Automatic adjustment of the relative importance of different input variables for optimization of counter-propagation artificial neural networks, Anal. Chim. Acta 642 (2009), pp. 142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.X. Jiang, Y. Li, J. Li, and G.X. Wang, Prediction of the aquatic toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis from molecular descriptors, Int. J. Environ. Res. 5 (2011), pp. 923–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ren, Determining the mechanisms of toxic action of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis, Environ. Toxicol. 17 (2002), pp. 119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Brito-Sánchez, J.A. Castillo-Garit, H. Le-Thi-Thu, Y. González-Madariaga, F. Torrens, Y. Marrero-Ponce, and J. Enrique Rodríguez-Borges, Comparative study to predict toxic modes of action of phenols from molecular structures, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 24 (2013), pp. 235–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Ertürk, M.T. Saçan, M. Novic, and N. Minovski, Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) using the novel marine algal toxicity data of phenols, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 38 (2012), pp. 90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.O. Aptula, T.I. Netzeva, I.V. Valkova, M.T.D. Cronin, T.W. Schultz, R. Kühne, and G. Schüürmann, Multivariate discrimination between modes of toxic action of phenols, Mol. Inform. 21 (2002), pp. 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• M.T.D. Cronin, A.O. Aptula, J.C. Duffy, T.I. Netzeva, P.H. Rowe, I.V. Valkova, and T.W. Schultz, Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis, Chemosphere 49 (2002), pp. 1201–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Roy and P.L.A. PopeIier, Predictive QSPR modeling of the acidic dissociation constant (pKa) of phenols in different solvents, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 22 (2009), pp. 186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jover, R. Bosque, and J. Sales, Neural network based QSPR study for predicting pKa of phenols in different solvents, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 385–397.
   Google Scholar
• J.K. Liao, M. Seto, and K. Noma, Rho Kinase (ROCK) inhibitors, J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 50 (2007), pp. 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Goodarzi, Y. Vander Heyden, and S. Funar-Timofei, Towards better understanding of feature-selection or reduction techniques for quantitative structure–activity relationship models, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 42 (2013), pp. 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Sheikhpour, M.A. Sarram, S. Gharaghani, and M.A. Zare Chahooki, Feature selection based on graph Laplacian by utilizing compounds with known and unknown activities, J. Chemom. 31 (2017), e2899. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cem.2899/full.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Valizade Hasanloei, R. Sheikhpour, M.A. Sarram, E. Sheikhpour, and H. Sharifi, A combined Fisher and Laplacian score for feature selection in QSAR based drug design using compounds with known and unknown activities, J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. preprint 2017. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10822-017-0094-6.
   Google Scholar
• C. Yap, PaDEL-descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints, J. Comput. Chem. 32 (2011), pp. 1446–1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Rácz, D. Bajusz, and K. Héberger, Consistency of QSAR models: Correct split of training and test sets, ranking of models and performance parameters, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 683–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Ventura, D.A.R.S. Latino, and F. Martins, Comparison of multiple linear regressions and neural networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 70 (2013), pp. 831–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tropsha, P. Gramatica, and V.K. Gombar, The importance of being earnest: Validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models, QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003), pp. 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• A. Golbraikh and A. Tropsha, Beware of q2!, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20 (2002), pp. 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.P. Roy and K. Roy, On some aspects of variable selection for partial least squares regression models, Mol. Inform. 27 (2008), pp. 302–313.
   Google Scholar