In silico prediction of dermal absorption of pesticides – an evaluation of selected models against results from in vitro testing

References

• OECD, Guidance document for the conduct of skin absorption studies, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 28, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Environmental Health Criteria 235: Dermal Absorption World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• R. Holmgaard and J. Bo Nielsen, Dermal absorption of pesticides–evaluation of variability and prevention, The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R. Glass and K. Machera, Evaluating the risks of occupational pesticide exposure, Hellenic Plant Protect. J. 2 (2009), pp. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), H. Buist, P. Craig, I. Dewhurst, S.H. Bennekou, C. Kneuer, K. Machera, C. Pieper, D.C. Marques, G. Guillot, F. Ruffo, and A. Chiusolo, Guidance on dermal absorption, EFSA J. 15 (2017), pp. 4873. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geinoz, R.H. Guy, B. Testa, and P.A. Carrupt, Quantitative structure-permeation relationships (QSPeRs) to predict skin permeation: A critical evaluation, Pharm. Res. 21 (2004), pp. 83–92. doi:10.1023/B:PHAM.0000012155.27488.2b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Lian, L. Chen, and L. Han, An evaluation of mathematical models for predicting skin permeability, J. Pharm. Sci. 97 (2008), pp. 584–598. doi:10.1002/jps.21074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.P. Moss, J.C. Dearden, H. Patel, and M.T. Cronin, Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption, Toxicol. In Vitro 16 (2002), pp. 299–317. doi:10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00003-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Grice, Q. Zhang, and M.S. Roberts, Chemical structure-skin transport relationships, in Toxicology of the Skin, N.A. Monteiro-Riviere, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010, pp. 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• Q. Zhang, J.E. Grice, P. Li, O.G. Jepps, G.J. Wang, and M.S. Roberts, Skin solubility determines maximum transepidermal flux for similar size molecules, Pharm. Res. 26 (2009), pp. 1974–1985. doi:10.1007/s11095-009-9912-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Seif and S. Hansen, Measuring the stratum corneum reservoir: Desorption kinetics from keratin, J. Pharm. Sci. 101 (2012), pp. 3718–3728. doi:10.1002/jps.23245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Hafeez, A. Chiang, X. Hui, H. Zhu, F. Kamili, and H.I. Maibach, Stratum corneum reservoir as a predictive method for in vitro percutaneous absorption, J. Appl. Toxicol. 36 (2016), pp. 1003–1010. doi:10.1002/jat.3262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.M. Magnusson, Y.G. Anissimov, S.E. Cross, and M.S. Roberts, Molecular size as the main determinant of solute maximum flux across the skin, J. Invest. Dermatol. 122 (2004), pp. 993–999. doi:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22413.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.O. Potts and R.H. Guy, Predicting skin permeability, Pharm. Res. 9 (1992), pp. 663–669. doi:10.1023/A:1015810312465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals (no. 428): Skin Absorption: in Vitro Method, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Guidance notes for the estimation of dermal absorption values, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 156, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA, Panel on plant protection products and their residues, guidance on dermal absorption, EFSA J. 10(2012), pp. 2665–2694. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2665.
   Google Scholar
• H. Buist, P. Craig, I. Dewhurst, S. Hougaard Bennekou, C. Kneuer, K. Machera, C. Pieper, D.C. Marques, G. Guillot, F. Ruffo, and A. Chiusolo, Guidance on dermal absorption, EFSA J. 15 (2017), pp. 4873. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mitragotri, Modeling skin permeability to hydrophilic and hydrophobic solutes based on four permeation pathways, J. Control Release 86 (2003), pp. 69–92. doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00321-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.L. Cleek and A.L. Bunge, A new method for estimating dermal absorption from chemical exposure: 2. Effect of molecular weight and octanol-water partitioning, Pharm. Res. 12 (1995), pp. 88–95. doi:10.1023/A:1016242821610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Alov, M.T.D. Cronin, A. Diukendjieva, J.C. Madden, I. Pajeva, F.P. Steinmetz, I. Tsakovska, and C. Yang, In silico models for skin permeability and gastrointestinal absorption to facilitate extrapolation between oral and dermal administrations for repeated dose toxicity, SEURAT-1 5th Annual Meeting, Barcelona, Spain, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• C. de Heer, A. Wilschut, H. Stevenson, and B.C. Hakkert, Guidance document on the estimation of dermal absorption according to a tiered approach: An update, TNO Report (1999)
   Google Scholar
• H.E. Buist, J.A. van Burgsteden, A.P. Freidig, W.J. Maas, and J.J. van de Sandt, New in vitro dermal absorption database and the prediction of dermal absorption under finite conditions for risk assessment purposes, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 57 (2010), pp. 200–209. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Tibaldi, W. Ten Berge, and D. Drolet, Dermal absorption of chemicals: Estimation by IH SkinPerm, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 11 (2014), pp. 19–31. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.831983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Test No. 105: Water Solubility, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 1, OECD Publishing, Paris, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and European Council, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, Offl J. Eur. Union. L353 (2008)pp. 1–1355.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Dancik, M.A. Miller, J. Jaworska, and G.B. Kasting, Design and performance of a spreadsheet-based model for estimating bioavailability of chemicals from dermal exposure, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 65 (2013), pp. 221–236. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kroes, A.G. Renwick, V. Feron, C.L. Galli, M. Gibney, H. Greim, R.H. Guy, J.C. Lhuguenot, and J.J. van de Sandt, Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, Food. Chem. Toxicol. 45 (2007), pp. 2533–2562. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Wilschut, W. Ten Berge, P.J. Robinson, and T.E. McKone, Estimating skin permeation. The validation of five mathematical skin permeation models, Chemosphere 30 (1995), pp. 1275–1296. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(95)00023-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.F. Frasch and A.M. Barbero, Application of numerical methods for diffusion-based modeling of skin permeation, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65 (2013), pp. 208–220. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.B. Kasting, N.D. Barai, T.F. Wang, and J.M. Nitsche, Mobility of water in human stratum corneum, J. Pharm. Sci. 92 (2003), pp. 2326–2340. doi:10.1002/jps.10483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Barbero and H.F. Frasch, Transcellular route of diffusion through stratum corneum: Results from finite element models, J. Pharm. Sci. 95 (2006), pp. 2186–2194. doi:10.1002/jps.20695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.F. Wang, G.B. Kasting, and J.M. Nitsche, A multiphase microscopic diffusion model for stratum corneum permeability, II. Estimation of physicochemical parameters, and application to a large permeability database, J. Pharm. Sci. 96 (2007), pp. 3024–3051. doi:10.1002/jps.20883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Batke, M. Gutlein, F. Partosch, U. Gundert-Remy, C. Helma, S. Kramer, A. Maunz, M. Seeland, and A. Bitsch, Innovative strategies to develop chemical categories using a combination of structural and toxicological properties, Front. Pharmacol. 7 (2016). doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCCS, SCCS notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation 9th revision, SCCS/1564/15, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• K.T. Hoang, Dermal exposure assessment: Principles and applications, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, EPA/600/8-91/011B, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• W.J. Romonchuk and A.L. Bunge, Permeation of 4-cyanophenol and methyl paraben from powder and saturated aqueous solution through silicone rubber membranes and human skin, J. Pharm. Sci. 95 (2006), pp. 2526–2533. doi:10.1002/jps.20735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Aggarwal, P. Fisher, A. Huser, F.M. Kluxen, R. Parr-Dobrzanski, M. Soufi, C. Strupp, C. Wiemann, and R. Billington, Assessment of an extended dataset of in vitro human dermal absorption studies on pesticides to determine default values, opportunities for read-across and influence of dilution on absorption, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 72 (2015), pp. 58–70. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.R. Blickenstaff, G. Coman, C.M. Blattner, R. Andersen, and H.I. Maibach, Biology of percutaneous penetration, Rev. Environ. Health 29 (2014), pp. 145–155. doi:10.1515/reveh-2014-0052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Otto, J. Du Plessis, and J.W. Wiechers, Formulation effects of topical emulsions on transdermal and dermal delivery, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 31 (2009), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00467.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R.L. Bronaugh, R.F. Stewart, R.C. Wester, D. Bucks, H.I. Maibach, and J. Anderson, Comparison of percutaneous absorption of fragrances by humans and monkeys, Food Chem. Toxicol. 23 (1985), pp. 111–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.J. van de Sandt, J.A. van Burgsteden, S. Cage, P.L. Carmichael, I. Dick, S. Kenyon, G. Korinth, F. Larese, J.C. Limasset, W.J. Maas, L. Montomoli, J.B. Nielsen, J.P. Payan, E. Robinson, P. Sartorelli, K.H. Schaller, S.C. Wilkinson, and F.M. Williams, In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: A multi-centre comparison study, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39 (2004), pp. 271–281. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.C. Wilkinson, W.J. Maas, J.B. Nielsen, L.C. Greaves, J.J. van de Sandt, and F.M. Williams, Interactions of skin thickness and physicochemical properties of test compounds in percutaneous penetration studies, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 79 (2006), pp. 405–413. doi:10.1007/s00420-005-0056-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Di Nardo, K. Sugino, P. Wertz, J. Ademola, and H.I. Maibach, Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) induced irritant contact dermatitis: A correlation study between ceramides and in vivo parameters of irritation, Contact Derm. 35 (1996), pp. 86–91. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02296.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.B. Nielsen, Percutaneous penetration through slightly damaged skin, Arch. Dermatol. Res. 296 (2005), pp. 560–567. doi:10.1007/s00403-005-0555-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Abraham, H.S. Chadha, F. Martins, R.C. Mitchell, M.W. Bradbury, and J.A. Gratton, Hydrogen bonding part 46: A review of the correlation and prediction of transport properties by an lfer method: Physicochemical properties, brain penetration and skin permeability, Pestic. Sci. 55 (1999), pp. 78–88. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199901)55:1<78::AID-PS853>3.0.CO;2-7.
   Google Scholar
• H. Patel, W. Ten Berge, and M.T.D. Cronin, Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals, Chemosphere 48 (2002), pp. 603–613. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00114-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Baert, E. Deconinck, M. Van Gele, M. Slodicka, P. Stoppie, S. Bodé, G. Slegers, Y. Vander Heyden, J. Lambert, J. Beetens, and B. De Spiegeleer, Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 15 (2007), pp. 6943–6955. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2007.07.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Riviere and J.D. Brooks, Predicting skin permeability from complex chemical mixtures, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 208 (2005), pp. 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Riviere and J.D. Brooks, Prediction of dermal absorption from complex chemical mixtures: incorporation of vehicle effects and interactions into a QSPR framework, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 18 (2007), pp. 31–44. doi:10.1080/10629360601033598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Riviere and J.D. Brooks, Predicting skin permeability from complex chemical mixtures: Dependency of quantitative structure permeation relationships on biology of skin model used, Toxicol. Sci. 119 (2011), pp. 224–232. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Guth, J.E. Riviere, J.D. Brooks, M. Dammann, E. Fabian, B. van Ravenzwaay, M. Schäfer-Korting, and R. Landsiedel, In silico models to predict dermal absorption from complex agrochemical formulations, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 565–588. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2014.919358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Tsakovska, I. Pajeva, M. Al Sharif, P. Alov, E. Fioravanzo, S. Kovarich, A.P. Worth, A.N. Richarz, C. Yang, A. Mostrag-Szlichtyng, and M.T.D. Cronin, Quantitative structure-skin permeability relationships, Toxicology 387 (2017), pp. 27–42. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2017.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.G. Samaras, J.E. Riviere, and T. Ghafourian, The effect of formulations and experimental conditions on in vitro human skin permeation-data from updated EDETOX database, Int. J. Pharm. 434 (2012), pp. 280–291. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. van Ravenzwaay and E. Leibold, A comparison between in vitro rat and human and in vivo rat skin absorption studies, Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 23 (2004), pp. 421–430. doi:10.1191/0960327104ht471oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar