Consensus QSAR models estimating acute toxicity to aquatic organisms from different trophic levels: algae, Daphnia and fish

References

• European Commission, Regulation (EC) no 1907/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restric- tion of chemicals (REACH), establishing a European chemicals agency, amend-ing directive 1999/45/ECC and repealing council regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and commission regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as council directive 76/769/EEC and commission directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EEC and 2000/21/EC, Off. J. Eur. Union. 50 (2007), pp. 1–281.
   Google Scholar
• K.P. Singh, S. Gupta, A. Kumar, and D. Mohan, Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27 (2014), pp. 741–753. doi:10.1021/tx400371w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 3: Effects on Biotic Systems, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, FR, 2019. Available at http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/oecdguidelinesforthetestingofchemicals.htm.
   Google Scholar
• V. Aruoja, M. Moosus, A. Kahru, M. Sihtmäe, and U. Maran, Measurement of baseline toxicity and QSAR analysis of 50 non-polar and 58 polar narcotic chemicals for the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chemosphere 96 (2014), pp. 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, S. Cassani, P.P. Roy, S. Kovarich, C.W. Yap, and E. Papa, QSAR modeling is not “Push a button and find a correlation”: A case study of toxicity of (Benzo-)triazoles on algae, Mol. Inform. 31 (2012), pp. 817–835. doi:10.1002/minf.201200075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Levet, C. Bordes, Y. Clément, P. Mignon, C. Morell, H. Chermette, P. Marote, and P. Lantéri, Acute aquatic toxicity of organic solvents modeled by QSARs, J. Mol. Model. 22 (2016), pp. 288–298. doi:10.1007/s00894-016-3156-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Khan, P.M. Khan, G. Lavado, C. Valsecchi, J. Pasqualini, D. Baderna, M. Marzo, A. Lombardo, K. Roy, and E. Benfenati, QSAR modeling of Daphnia magna and fish toxicities of biocides using 2D descriptors, Chemosphere 229 (2019), pp. 8–17. doi:10.1016/j. chemosphere.2019.04.204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bertinetto, C. Duce, R. Solaro, M.R. Tiné, A. Micheli, K. Héberger, A. Miličević, and S. Nikolić, Modeling of the acute toxicity of benzene derivatives by complementary QSAR methods, Match 70 (2013), pp. 1005–1021.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA, Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows V4.11, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 2012; software available at https://www.epa.gov/tscascreening-tools/epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface.
   Google Scholar
• E. Benfenati, A. Manganaro, and G. Gini, VEGA-QSAR: AI inside a platform for predictive toxicology. Proceedings of the workshop ‘Popularize Artificial Intelligence’ 2013, December 5th 2013, Turin, Italy, 2013, published on CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol 1107.
   Google Scholar
• T. Martin, P. Harten, and D. Young, (T.E.S.T.) Toxicity Estimation Software Tool V 4.1, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012; software available at https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/toxicity-estimation-software-tool-test.
   Google Scholar
• T. Sheffield and R.S. Judson, Ensemble QSAR modeling to predict multispecies fish toxicity lethal concentrations and points of departure, Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (2019), pp. 2793–2802. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Khan and K. Roy, Ecotoxicological QSAR modelling of organic chemicals against Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata using consensus predictions approach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 665–681. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1648315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S. Kar and K. Roy, QSAR modeling of toxicity of diverse organic chemicals to Daphnia magna using 2D and 3D descriptors, J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (2010), pp. 344–351. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cassotti, D. Ballabio, V. Consonni, A. Mauri, I.V. Tetko, and R. Todeschini, Prediction of acute aquatic toxicity toward Daphnia magna by using the GA-kNN method, ATLA Altern. To Lab. Anim. 42 (2014), pp. 31–41. doi:10.1177/026119291404200106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L.E. Kaiser and S.P. Niculescu, Modeling acute toxicity of chemicals to Daphnia magna: Aprobabilistic neural network approach, Env. Tox. Chem. 20 (2001), pp. 420–431. doi:10.1002/etc.5620200225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Golbamaki, A. Cassano, A. Lombardo, Y. Moggio, M. Colafranceschi, and E. Benfenati, Comparison of in silico models for prediction of Daphnia magna acute toxicity, SAR QSAREnviron. Res. 25 (2014), pp. 673–694. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2014.923041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Wang, M. Zheng, J. Xiao, Y. Lu, F. Wang, J. Lu, X. Luo, W. Zhu, H. Jiang, and K. Chen, Using support vector regression coupled with the genetic algorithm for predicting acute toxicity to the fathead minnow, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 21 (2010), pp. 559–570.doi:10.1080/1062936X.2010.502300.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cassotti, D. Ballabio, R. Todeschini, and V. Consonni, A similarity-based QSAR model for predicting acute toxicity towards the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 217–243. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2015.1018938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Khan, D. Baderna, C. Cappelli, C. Toma, A. Lombardo, K. Roy, and E. Benfenati, Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of organic compounds against fish: Application of fragment based descriptors in feature analysis, Aquat. Toxicol. 212 (2019), pp. 162–174. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models, Tech. Rep. ENV/JM/MONO(2007)2, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, FR, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• G. Marcou, D. Horvath, F. Bonachera, and A. Varnek, Laboratoire De Chemoinformatique UMR 7140 CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FR, 2019. Available at http://infochim. 520u-strasbg.fr.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Data From: EChemPortal: Global Portal to Information on Chemical Substances, Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development; dataset available at https://www.echemportal.org/echemportal/index.action.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA, Data From: ECOTOX Knowledgebase. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2017; 525 dataset available at https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
   Google Scholar
• S. Cassani, S. Kovarich, E. Papa, P.P. Roy, L. van der Wal, and P. Gramatica, Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies quantitative activity-activity modelling, J. Hazard. Mater. 258–259 (2013), pp. 50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Toropov, A.P. Toropova, M. Marzo, J. Lou Dorne, N. Georgiadis, and E. Benfenati, QSAR models for predicting acute toxicity of pesticides in rainbow trout using the CORAL software and EFSA’s OpenFoodTox database, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 53 (2017), pp. 158–163.doi:10.1016/j.etap.2017.05.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Wu, Q. Zhang, and J. Hu, QSAR study of the acute toxicity to fathead minnow based on a large dataset, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 147–164. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2015.1137353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Furuhama, K. Hasunuma, T.I. Hayashi, and N. Tatarazako, Predicting algal growth inhibition toxicity: Three-step strategy using structural and physicochemical properties, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 27 (2016), pp. 343–362. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2016.1174151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OASIS, QSAR Toolbox V 4.3, OASIS Laboratory of mathematical chemistry, Burgas, BG, 2017; software available at http://oasis-lmc.org/products/software/toolbox.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• M. Berthold, N. Cebron, F. Dill, T. Gabriel, T. Kötter, T. Meinl, P. Ohl, K. Thiel, and B. Wiswedel, KNIME - the konstanz information miner: Version 2.0 and beyond, SIGKDD Explor. 11 (2009), 545 pp. 26–31. doi:10.1145/1656274.1656280.
   Google Scholar
• NIH, PubChem, National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Maryland, 2019. Available at https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• H.-J. Klimisch, M. Andreae, and U. Tillmann, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 25 (1997), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ruggiu, G. Marcou, A. Varnek, and D. Horvath, ISIDA property-labelled fragment descriptors, Mol. Inform. 29 (2010), pp. 855–868. doi:10.1002/minf.201000099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Lunghini, G. Marcou, P. Azam, R. Patoux, M.H. Enrici, F. Bonachera, D. Horvath, and A. Varnek, QSPR models for bioconcentration factor (BCF): Are they able to predict data of industrial interest? SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 507–524. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1626278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Lunghini, G. Marcou, P. Azam, D. Horvath, R. Patoux, E. Van Miert, and A. Varnek, Consensus models to predict oral rat acute toxicity and validation on a dataset coming from the industrial context, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 30 (2019), pp. 879–897. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1672089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Lunghini, G. Marcou, P. Gantzer, P. Azam, D. Horvath, E. Van Miert, and A. Varnek, Modelling of ready biodegradability based on combined public and industrial data sources, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 31 (2020), pp. 171–186. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1697360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Kireeva, I.I. Baskin, H.A. Gaspar, D. Horvath, G. Marcou, and A. Varnek, Generative Topographic Mapping (GTM): Universal tool for data visualization, structure-activity modeling and dataset comparison, Mol. Inform. 31 (2012), pp. 301–312. doi:10.1002/minf.201100163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Bishop, M. Svensén, C.K.I. Williams, and M. Svens, The generative topographic mapping, Neural Comput 10 (1998), pp. 215–234. doi:10.1162/089976698300017953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Horvath, J. Brown, G. Marcou, and A. Varnek, An evolutionary optimizer of LIBSVM models, Challenges 5 (2014), pp. 450–472. doi:10.3390/challe5020450.
   Google Scholar
• C. Chih-Chung and L. Chih-Jen, LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines, ACM Trans. Inte ll. Syst. Technol. 2 (2011), pp. 1–27. doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Gramatica, Principles of QSAR models validation: Internal and external, QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), pp. 694–701. doi:10.1002/qsar.200610151.
   Google Scholar
• G. Marcou, D. Horvath, V. Solov’Ev, A. Arrault, P. Vayer, and A. Varnek, Interpretability of SAR/ QSAR models of any complexity by atomic contributions, Mol. Inform. 31 (2012), pp. 639–642. doi:10.1002/minf.201100136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Gini, G. Giuseppina, T. Ferrari, A. Lombardo, A. Cassano, and E. Benfenati, A new QSAR model for acute fish toxicity based on mined structural alerts, J. Toxicol. Risk Assess. 5 (2019), pp. 2572–2580.
   Google Scholar
• C.I. Cappelli, A. Cassano, A. Golbamaki, Y. Moggio, A. Lombardo, M. Colafranceschi, and E. Benfenati, Assessment of in silico models for acute aquatic toxicity towards fish under REACH regulation, SARQSAR Environ. Res. 26 (2015), pp. 977–999. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2015.1104519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pavan, A.P. Worth, and T.I. Netzeva, Comparative Assessment of QSAR Models for Aquatic Toxicity, Tech. Rep. 21750EN, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, IT, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lozano, E. Lescot, M.P. Halm, A. Lepailleur, R. Bureau, and S. Rault, Prediction of acute toxicity in fish by using QSAR methods and chemical modes of action, J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 25 (2010), pp. 195–203. doi:10.3109/14756360903169857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hrovat, H. Segner, and S. Jeram, Variability of in vivo fish acute toxicity data, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 54 (2009), pp. 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.J.M. Verhaar, C.J. van Leeuwen, and J.L.M. Hermens, Classifying environmental pollutants, Chemosphere 25 (1992), pp. 471–491. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(92)90280-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.L. Russom, S.P. Bradbury, S.J. Broderius, D.E. Hammermeister, and R.A. Drummond, Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 (2005), pp. 948. doi:10.1002/etc.5620160514.
   Google Scholar
• S.J. Enoch, M. Hewitt, M.T.D. Cronin, S. Azam, and J.C. Madden, Classification of chemicals according to mechanism of aquatic toxicity: An evaluation of the implementation of the Verhaar scheme in Toxtree, Chemosphere 73 (2008), pp. 243–248. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.C. Thomas, P. Bicherel, and F.J. Bauer, How in silico and QSAR approaches can increase confidence in environmental hazard and risk assessment, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 15 (2019), pp. 40–50. doi:10.1002/ieam.4108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Burden, S.K. Maynard, L. Weltje, and J.R. Wheeler, The utility of QSARs in predicting acute fish toxicity of pesticide metabolites: A retrospective validation approach, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 80 (2016), pp. 241–246. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Substances and Mixtures, Tech. Rep. JT03442844, Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development, Paris, FR, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• G.E. Bragin, C.W. Davis, M.H. Kung, B.A. Kelley, C.A. Sutherland, and M.A. Lampi, Biodegradation and ecotoxicity of branched alcohol ethoxylates: Application of the target lipid model and implications for environmental classification, J. Surfactants Deterg. 23 (2020), pp. 383–403. doi:10.1002/jsde.12359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.W. Roberts, QSAR issues in aquatic toxicity of surfactants, Sci. Total Environ. 109 (1991), pp.557–568. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(91)90209-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar